Olympus TG-870 vs Sony A350
91 Imaging
41 Features
46 Overall
43
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/98cb4/98cb42e909dff8452621d79a82a9f24270e5e01f" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 front Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/12c81/12c817401ce2f8957e577f0ee287d1054036861a" alt="Sony Alpha DSLR-A350 front Sony Alpha DSLR-A350 front"
62 Imaging
52 Features
47 Overall
50
Olympus TG-870 vs Sony A350 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400 (Expand to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 221g - 113 x 64 x 28mm
- Announced January 2016
- Earlier Model is Olympus TG-860
(Full Review)
- 14MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 674g - 131 x 99 x 75mm
- Announced June 2008
- Newer Model is Sony A380
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus TG-870 vs Sony A350 Overview
Its time to look closer at the Olympus TG-870 versus Sony A350, one is a Ultracompact and the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. The image resolution of the TG-870 (16MP) and the A350 (14MP) is very comparable but the TG-870 (1/2.3") and A350 (APS-C) boast totally different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The TG-870 was unveiled 7 years after the A350 which is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Olympus TG-870 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sony A350 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before going into a comprehensive comparison, here is a simple summation of how the TG-870 grades vs the A350 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus TG-870 vs Sony A350 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 and Sony Alpha DSLR-A350. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-870 Gallery and Sony A350 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-870 over the Sony A350
TG-870 | A350 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2016 | ![]() | June 2008 | More modern by 93 months |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 921k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+691k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony A350 over the Olympus TG-870
A350 | TG-870 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More exact focus |
Common features in the Olympus TG-870 and Sony A350
TG-870 | A350 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Tilting | Tilting display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither includes Touch friendly display |
Olympus TG-870 vs Sony A350 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to carry around your camera often, you have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus TG-870 features exterior measurements of 113mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") and a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs) whilst the Sony A350 has measurements of 131mm x 99mm x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") accompanied by a weight of 674 grams (1.49 lbs).
Check the Olympus TG-870 versus Sony A350 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you choose at that time. Here is a front view over all size comparison of the TG-870 vs the A350.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d47ef/d47ef45bb97bda69581726da3f4a522c3f6a1ee1" alt="Olympus TG-870 vs Sony A350 size comparison Olympus TG-870 vs Sony A350 size comparison"
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the TG-870 and A350 is 91 and 62 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b2e3b/b2e3b41902c5cde342dcd0283598507b9c31cc03" alt="Olympus TG-870 vs Sony A350 top view buttons comparison Olympus TG-870 vs Sony A350 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus TG-870 vs Sony A350 Sensor Comparison
Usually, its hard to see the difference in sensor sizes purely by going through specs. The picture here might offer you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-870 and A350.
As you can plainly see, each of these cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The TG-870 having a smaller sensor will make getting shallow depth of field more challenging and the Olympus TG-870 will show extra detail having an extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The younger TG-870 is going to have a benefit in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/87b47/87b47dababa6d4c27a6ae242ab234dee0f185624" alt="Olympus TG-870 vs Sony A350 sensor size comparison Olympus TG-870 vs Sony A350 sensor size comparison"
Olympus TG-870 vs Sony A350 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/abdce/abdce95f01cc8d560adc00b8963a970e8ee24c2d" alt="Olympus TG-870 vs Sony A350 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus TG-870 vs Sony A350 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus TG-870 vs Sony A350 Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A350 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A350 |
Category | Ultracompact | Entry-Level DSLR |
Announced | 2016-01-06 | 2008-06-06 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.6 x 15.8mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 372.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4592 x 3056 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Max boosted ISO | 12800 | - |
Min native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens zoom range | 21-105mm (5.0x) | - |
Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.7 | - |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 143 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 2.7" |
Screen resolution | 921k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.49x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 7.0 frames per second | 3.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash settings | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) | - |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 221 grams (0.49 lb) | 674 grams (1.49 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 113 x 64 x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") | 131 x 99 x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 65 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.6 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.5 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 595 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 photographs | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | Li-50B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | Compact Flash (Type I or II), Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, UDMA Mode 5, Supports FAT12 / FAT16 / FAT32 |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch pricing | $280 | $600 |