Olympus TG-870 vs Sony NEX-3
91 Imaging
41 Features
46 Overall
43
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/98cb4/98cb42e909dff8452621d79a82a9f24270e5e01f" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 front Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fbbce/fbbcef1a206577b4ac051e84289a628a2f2db4ba" alt="Sony Alpha NEX-3 front Sony Alpha NEX-3 front"
89 Imaging
54 Features
55 Overall
54
Olympus TG-870 vs Sony NEX-3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 6400 (Expand to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 221g - 113 x 64 x 28mm
- Announced January 2016
- Replaced the Olympus TG-860
(Full Review)
- 14MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 12800
- 1280 x 720 video
- Sony E Mount
- 297g - 117 x 62 x 33mm
- Announced June 2010
- Successor is Sony NEX-C3
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus TG-870 vs Sony NEX-3 Overview
Below, we will be matching up the Olympus TG-870 versus Sony NEX-3, one is a Ultracompact and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by competitors Olympus and Sony. The image resolution of the TG-870 (16MP) and the NEX-3 (14MP) is pretty close but the TG-870 (1/2.3") and NEX-3 (APS-C) possess different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The TG-870 was brought out 5 years after the NEX-3 which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus TG-870 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sony NEX-3 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting through a more detailed comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the TG-870 matches up vs the NEX-3 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus TG-870 vs Sony NEX-3 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 and Sony Alpha NEX-3. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-870 Gallery and Sony NEX-3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-870 over the Sony NEX-3
TG-870 | NEX-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2016 | ![]() | June 2010 | More modern by 68 months |
Screen resolution | 921k | ![]() | 920k | Clearer screen (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony NEX-3 over the Olympus TG-870
NEX-3 | TG-870 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More precise focusing |
Common features in the Olympus TG-870 and Sony NEX-3
TG-870 | NEX-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Tilting | Tilting screen |
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical screen sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Lacking Touch screen |
Olympus TG-870 vs Sony NEX-3 Physical Comparison
If you're going to carry around your camera, you will have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus TG-870 enjoys outside measurements of 113mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs) while the Sony NEX-3 has measurements of 117mm x 62mm x 33mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.3") along with a weight of 297 grams (0.65 lbs).
See the Olympus TG-870 versus Sony NEX-3 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you use during that time. Below is the front view size comparison of the TG-870 compared to the NEX-3.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fcfb3/fcfb3734e25f12329ff0f3c77e99bfc608103dec" alt="Olympus TG-870 vs Sony NEX-3 size comparison Olympus TG-870 vs Sony NEX-3 size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the TG-870 and NEX-3 is 91 and 89 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cea8a/cea8a1e0d04149908799bb319f758c368ae96e75" alt="Olympus TG-870 vs Sony NEX-3 top view buttons comparison Olympus TG-870 vs Sony NEX-3 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus TG-870 vs Sony NEX-3 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its tough to picture the gap in sensor sizes only by researching specifications. The pic underneath might offer you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-870 and NEX-3.
To sum up, each of these cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The TG-870 due to its smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF harder and the Olympus TG-870 will render extra detail having its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will help you crop photographs much more aggressively. The more recent TG-870 provides an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/07fb1/07fb10acc79b0a73103d90ef0f62b5b32da6c517" alt="Olympus TG-870 vs Sony NEX-3 sensor size comparison Olympus TG-870 vs Sony NEX-3 sensor size comparison"
Olympus TG-870 vs Sony NEX-3 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0ff18/0ff18622ffdb9bb5882325f6142f879a81f60395" alt="Olympus TG-870 vs Sony NEX-3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus TG-870 vs Sony NEX-3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus TG-870 vs Sony NEX-3 Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 | Sony Alpha NEX-3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 | Sony Alpha NEX-3 |
Class | Ultracompact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Announced | 2016-01-06 | 2010-06-07 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VII | Bionz |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 365.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4592 x 3056 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
Highest boosted ISO | 12800 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 125 | 200 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | - | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Sony E |
Lens zoom range | 21-105mm (5.0x) | - |
Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.7 | - |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 121 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Tilting | Tilting |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 921k dots | 920k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display technology | - | TFT Xtra Fine LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 7.0fps | 7.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) | 12.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | - | 1/160s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 221g (0.49 lbs) | 297g (0.65 lbs) |
Dimensions | 113 x 64 x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") | 117 x 62 x 33mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 68 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.1 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.0 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 830 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 shots | 330 shots |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | Li-50B | NPFW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10sec (3 images)) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $280 | $0 |