Olympus TG-870 vs Sony NEX-F3
91 Imaging
41 Features
46 Overall
43
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/98cb4/98cb42e909dff8452621d79a82a9f24270e5e01f" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 front Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/90dc9/90dc94a541028ea772791a0c7d7016eaa915f96a" alt="Sony Alpha NEX-F3 front Sony Alpha NEX-F3 front"
86 Imaging
57 Features
60 Overall
58
Olympus TG-870 vs Sony NEX-F3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400 (Push to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 221g - 113 x 64 x 28mm
- Launched January 2016
- Succeeded the Olympus TG-860
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 16000
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 314g - 117 x 67 x 42mm
- Launched August 2012
- Earlier Model is Sony NEX-C3
- Updated by Sony NEX-3N
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus TG-870 vs Sony NEX-F3 Overview
Below is a in-depth analysis of the Olympus TG-870 vs Sony NEX-F3, former being a Ultracompact while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by brands Olympus and Sony. The resolution of the TG-870 (16MP) and the NEX-F3 (16MP) is pretty comparable but the TG-870 (1/2.3") and NEX-F3 (APS-C) posses totally different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The TG-870 was introduced 3 years later than the NEX-F3 and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus TG-870 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sony NEX-F3 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before going right into a thorough comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the TG-870 matches up against the NEX-F3 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus TG-870 vs Sony NEX-F3 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 & Sony Alpha NEX-F3. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus TG-870 Gallery & Sony NEX-F3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-870 over the Sony NEX-F3
TG-870 | NEX-F3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2016 | ![]() | August 2012 | More recent by 42 months |
Screen resolution | 921k | ![]() | 920k | Crisper screen (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony NEX-F3 over the Olympus TG-870
NEX-F3 | TG-870 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More precise focus |
Common features in the Olympus TG-870 and Sony NEX-F3
TG-870 | NEX-F3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Tilting | Tilting screen |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal screen measurement |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither comes with Touch friendly screen |
Olympus TG-870 vs Sony NEX-F3 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to lug around your camera, you'll need to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus TG-870 comes with external dimensions of 113mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") having a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs) and the Sony NEX-F3 has measurements of 117mm x 67mm x 42mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.7") and a weight of 314 grams (0.69 lbs).
Check the Olympus TG-870 vs Sony NEX-F3 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Below is a front view overall size comparison of the TG-870 against the NEX-F3.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3606e/3606ea104d77b845ef519e362aed3d8a23ba7b45" alt="Olympus TG-870 vs Sony NEX-F3 size comparison Olympus TG-870 vs Sony NEX-F3 size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TG-870 and NEX-F3 is 91 and 86 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f3ad1/f3ad185a1206ac60c0e141df40cf32064a524084" alt="Olympus TG-870 vs Sony NEX-F3 top view buttons comparison Olympus TG-870 vs Sony NEX-F3 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus TG-870 vs Sony NEX-F3 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's hard to see the difference in sensor measurements only by seeing specs. The visual here might provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-870 and NEX-F3.
All in all, both of these cameras have the same megapixels albeit not the same sensor measurements. The TG-870 includes the smaller sensor which should make obtaining shallow depth of field harder. The younger TG-870 is going to have a benefit in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1132c/1132c667f18aea8839339dd2bc7d1fc4931b86a9" alt="Olympus TG-870 vs Sony NEX-F3 sensor size comparison Olympus TG-870 vs Sony NEX-F3 sensor size comparison"
Olympus TG-870 vs Sony NEX-F3 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/966ee/966ee337c21e04a05b81b2749ff6a78421f13a49" alt="Olympus TG-870 vs Sony NEX-F3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus TG-870 vs Sony NEX-F3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus TG-870 vs Sony NEX-F3 Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 | Sony Alpha NEX-F3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 | Sony Alpha NEX-F3 |
Category | Ultracompact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Launched | 2016-01-06 | 2012-08-16 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VII | Bionz |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 365.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4912 x 3264 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 16000 |
Highest boosted ISO | 12800 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | 200 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Sony E |
Lens focal range | 21-105mm (5.0x) | - |
Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.7 | - |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 121 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Tilting | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 921 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT Xtra Fine LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 7.0 frames per second | 6.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) | - |
Flash options | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | - | 1/160s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 24 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 221 gr (0.49 lb) | 314 gr (0.69 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 113 x 64 x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") | 117 x 67 x 42mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 73 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.7 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.3 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 1114 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 photos | 470 photos |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | Li-50B | NPFW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec 3 or 5 images) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $280 | $470 |