Olympus TG-870 vs Sony H200
Portability
91 Imaging
41 Features
46 Overall
43
91 Imaging
41 Features
46 Overall
43
Portability
67 Imaging
44 Features
31 Overall
38
67 Imaging
44 Features
31 Overall
38
Olympus TG-870 vs Sony H200 Key Specs
Olympus TG-870
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 6400 (Raise to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 221g - 113 x 64 x 28mm
- Announced January 2016
- Previous Model is Olympus TG-860
Sony H200
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-633mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 530g - 123 x 83 x 87mm
- Released January 2013
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus TG-870 vs Sony H200 Overview
The following is a detailed review of the Olympus TG-870 and Sony H200, one is a Ultracompact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Sony. The resolution of the TG-870 (16MP) and the H200 (20MP) is fairly close and both cameras offer the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe TG-870 was manufactured 3 years after the H200 which is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus TG-870 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sony H200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before we go right into a in-depth comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the TG-870 scores versus the H200 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus TG-870 vs Sony H200 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus TG-870 Gallery and Sony H200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-870 over the Sony H200
| TG-870 | H200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2016 |  | January 2013 | Newer by 37 months |
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display resolution | 921k |  | 460k | Sharper display (+461k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony H200 over the Olympus TG-870
| H200 | TG-870 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus TG-870 and Sony H200
| TG-870 | H200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither contains Touch friendly display |
Olympus TG-870 vs Sony H200 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to travel with your camera, you need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus TG-870 has got outside dimensions of 113mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") and a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs) and the Sony H200 has measurements of 123mm x 83mm x 87mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 3.4") having a weight of 530 grams (1.17 lbs).
See the Olympus TG-870 and Sony H200 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are utilising during that time. Following is a front view overall size comparison of the TG-870 versus the H200.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the TG-870 and H200 is 91 and 67 respectively.
Olympus TG-870 vs Sony H200 Sensor Comparison
Generally, its tough to visualize the gap in sensor dimensions simply by viewing specs. The pic underneath might give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-870 and H200.
All in all, both of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but different megapixels. You should anticipate the Sony H200 to provide you with greater detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop photos more aggressively. The newer TG-870 provides an advantage in sensor tech.
Olympus TG-870 vs Sony H200 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Olympus TG-870 Portrait photography factors
Sony H200 Portrait photography factors
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
offers face detection focus
lack of manual focus
no manual control
no external flash support
small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
good resolution (20 megapixels)
includes face detection focusing
no manual focus
manual mode not available
external flash not possible
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Olympus TG-870 Street photography info
Sony H200 Street photography info
has a tilting screen
image stabilization (Optical)
environment proofing
small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
more heavy than competitors in class (221g)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
screen does not articulate
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
heavier than competition in class (530 grams)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Olympus TG-870 Sports photography advice
Sony H200 Sports photography advice
image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
offers tracking autofocus
environment proofing
better than average battery (300 shots)
lack of shutter priority mode
small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
amazing zoom range (24-633mm 26.4 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
good resolution (20MP)
includes tracking autofocus
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
terrible battery life (240 shots)
lack of phase detect AF
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Olympus TG-870 Travel photography details
Sony H200 Travel photography details
better than average battery (300 CIPA)
environment proofing
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
pretty wide (21mm)
more heavy than competitors in class (221g)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
good resolution (20 megapixels)
has built in flash
fairly wide (24mm)
long zoom (633mm)
missing Time Lapse function
terrible battery life (240 shots)
heavier than competition in class (530g)
display isn't selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f3.1)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Olympus TG-870 Landscape photography factors
Sony H200 Landscape photography factors
pretty wide (21mm)
screen size is decent (3")
image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
environment proofing
better than average battery (300 CIPA)
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
no manual control
small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
fairly wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
good resolution (20 megapixels)
no manual focus
cannot change lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.1)
manual mode not available
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
terrible battery life (240 CIPA)
missing Time Lapse function
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Vlogging with Olympus TG-870
Vlogging with Sony H200
pretty wide (21mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
offers face detection focus
video res high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
missing external microphone socket
more heavy than competitors in class (221g)
fairly wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
includes face detection focusing
sluggish max aperture (f3.1)
display isn't selfie friendly
low quality video (1280 x 720 resolution)
missing external mic support
heavier than competition in class (530 grams)
Photography Glossary
Olympus TG-870 vs Sony H200 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
| Model | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200 |
| Type | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2016-01-06 | 2013-01-08 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic VII | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 20MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5184 x 2920 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | 12800 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 125 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 21-105mm (5.0x) | 24-633mm (26.4x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.7 | f/3.1-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 20cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 921k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display technology | - | ClearPhoto LCD display |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1500s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 7.0fps | 8.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) | 6.80 m |
| Flash options | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Advanced Flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 221 grams (0.49 pounds) | 530 grams (1.17 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 113 x 64 x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") | 123 x 83 x 87mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 3.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 photographs | 240 photographs |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | AA |
| Battery model | Li-50B | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | $280 | $250 |