Olympus TG-870 vs Sony T900
91 Imaging
41 Features
46 Overall
43
96 Imaging
34 Features
30 Overall
32
Olympus TG-870 vs Sony T900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400 (Push to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 221g - 113 x 64 x 28mm
- Revealed January 2016
- Previous Model is Olympus TG-860
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-10.0) lens
- 143g - 98 x 58 x 16mm
- Introduced February 2009
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus TG-870 vs Sony T900 Overview
Let's look a little more in depth at the Olympus TG-870 versus Sony T900, both Ultracompact cameras by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. There exists a noticeable gap among the image resolutions of the TG-870 (16MP) and T900 (12MP) but they feature the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe TG-870 was launched 6 years later than the T900 and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before we go straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the TG-870 scores vs the T900 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photography Glossary Olympus TG-870 vs Sony T900 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900. The complete galleries are available at Olympus TG-870 Gallery & Sony T900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-870 over the Sony T900
| TG-870 | T900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2016 |  | February 2009 | More recent by 84 months |
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
Reasons to pick Sony T900 over the Olympus TG-870
| T900 | TG-870 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very precise focusing | ||
| Display dimension | 3.5" |  | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 922k |  | 921k | Clearer display (+1k dot) |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus TG-870 and Sony T900
| TG-870 | T900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen |
Olympus TG-870 vs Sony T900 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to lug around your camera often, you will need to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus TG-870 has external dimensions of 113mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") and a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs) and the Sony T900 has sizing of 98mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") along with a weight of 143 grams (0.32 lbs).
Compare the Olympus TG-870 versus Sony T900 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Following is the front view scale comparison of the TG-870 vs the T900.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the TG-870 and T900 is 91 and 96 respectively.
Olympus TG-870 vs Sony T900 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very tough to see the gap in sensor measurements just by viewing a spec sheet. The graphic underneath will offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-870 and T900.
As you can see, both of the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but not the same MP. You can anticipate the Olympus TG-870 to result in greater detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The younger TG-870 will have an edge in sensor tech.
Olympus TG-870 vs Sony T900 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Olympus TG-870 vs Sony T900 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Sony |
| Model | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 |
| Class | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Revealed | 2016-01-06 | 2009-02-17 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic VII | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Max enhanced ISO | 12800 | - |
| Min native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 21-105mm (5.0x) | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.7 | f/3.5-10.0 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | 3.5" |
| Screen resolution | 921 thousand dots | 922 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 2s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 7.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) | 2.90 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 221 gr (0.49 lb) | 143 gr (0.32 lb) |
| Dimensions | 113 x 64 x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") | 98 x 58 x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 shots | - |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | Li-50B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at release | $280 | $300 |