Olympus TG-870 vs Sony W230
91 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
95 Imaging
34 Features
25 Overall
30
Olympus TG-870 vs Sony W230 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400 (Expand to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 221g - 113 x 64 x 28mm
- Announced January 2016
- Succeeded the Olympus TG-860
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 30-120mm (F2.8-5.8) lens
- 156g - 95 x 57 x 22mm
- Launched February 2009
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus TG-870 vs Sony W230 Overview
Here is a detailed assessment of the Olympus TG-870 versus Sony W230, former being a Ultracompact while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Sony. There exists a noticeable gap between the image resolutions of the TG-870 (16MP) and W230 (12MP) but both cameras offer the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe TG-870 was revealed 6 years later than the W230 and that is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus TG-870 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sony W230 being a Compact camera.
Before going right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a brief summary of how the TG-870 scores against the W230 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus TG-870 vs Sony W230 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W230. The full galleries are available at Olympus TG-870 Gallery & Sony W230 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-870 over the Sony W230
| TG-870 | W230 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2016 | February 2009 | Fresher by 84 months | |
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
| Display resolution | 921k | 230k | Sharper display (+691k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony W230 over the Olympus TG-870
| W230 | TG-870 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Very precise focus |
Common features in the Olympus TG-870 and Sony W230
| TG-870 | W230 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display measurements | |
| Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Lack of Touch display |
Olympus TG-870 vs Sony W230 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to carry your camera often, you'll have to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus TG-870 comes with exterior measurements of 113mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs) whilst the Sony W230 has measurements of 95mm x 57mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") having a weight of 156 grams (0.34 lbs).
See the Olympus TG-870 versus Sony W230 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Underneath is a front view over all size comparison of the TG-870 against the W230.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the TG-870 and W230 is 91 and 95 respectively.
Olympus TG-870 vs Sony W230 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is hard to imagine the difference between sensor sizing merely by checking specifications. The visual below will help give you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-870 and W230.
Plainly, both of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different MP. You can anticipate the Olympus TG-870 to resolve more detail because of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop images a bit more aggressively. The younger TG-870 provides an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus TG-870 vs Sony W230 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Olympus TG-870 vs Sony W230 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W230 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Sony |
| Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W230 |
| Class | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2016-01-06 | 2009-02-17 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic VII | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Highest enhanced ISO | 12800 | - |
| Min native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 21-105mm (5.0x) | 30-120mm (4.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.5-5.7 | f/2.8-5.8 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 4cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 921k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | 1s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1600s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 7.0 frames per sec | 2.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) | 3.90 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 221g (0.49 lbs) | 156g (0.34 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 113 x 64 x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") | 95 x 57 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 images | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | Li-50B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch price | $280 | $180 |