Olympus XZ-10 vs Olympus TG-310
Portability
91 Imaging
36 Features
57 Overall
44
91 Imaging
36 Features
57 Overall
44
Portability
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
Olympus XZ-10 vs Olympus TG-310 Key Specs
Olympus XZ-10
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F1.8-2.7) lens
- 221g - 102 x 61 x 34mm
- Launched January 2013
Olympus TG-310
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Announced January 2011
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus XZ-10 vs Olympus TG-310 Overview
Following is a comprehensive analysis of the Olympus XZ-10 vs Olympus TG-310, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof and both are built by Olympus. The image resolution of the XZ-10 (12MP) and the TG-310 (14MP) is pretty similar and they enjoy the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe XZ-10 was announced 2 years after the TG-310 which is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before going in to a detailed comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the XZ-10 matches up vs the TG-310 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus XZ-10 vs Olympus TG-310 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus XZ-10 & Olympus TG-310. The whole galleries are available at Olympus XZ-10 Gallery & Olympus TG-310 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-10 over the Olympus TG-310
| XZ-10 | TG-310 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2013 |  | January 2011 | More modern by 26 months |
| Manually focus |  | Very accurate focus | ||
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+690k dot) |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-310 over the Olympus XZ-10
| TG-310 | XZ-10 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-10 and Olympus TG-310
| XZ-10 | TG-310 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-10 vs Olympus TG-310 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you're going to have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus XZ-10 features exterior dimensions of 102mm x 61mm x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-310 has dimensions of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") having a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus XZ-10 vs Olympus TG-310 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you select during that time. Following is the front view dimensions comparison of the XZ-10 vs the TG-310.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the XZ-10 and TG-310 is 91 and 94 respectively.
Olympus XZ-10 vs Olympus TG-310 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be difficult to picture the gap between sensor sizes merely by reviewing technical specs. The image here may offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the XZ-10 and TG-310.
As you can tell, both cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit different megapixels. You can expect the Olympus TG-310 to offer you extra detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also let you crop photographs far more aggressively. The younger XZ-10 provides an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus XZ-10 vs Olympus TG-310 Screen and ViewFinder
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Olympus XZ-10 Portrait photography advice
Olympus TG-310 Portrait photography advice
focusing manually
comes with face detection autofocus
saves RAW formats
resolution not great (12 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
good megapixels (14MP)
provides face detection focusing
lack of manual focus
lack of manual exposure
no external flash support
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Olympus XZ-10 Street photography highlights
Olympus TG-310 Street photography highlights
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
saves RAW formats
no moving screen
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
more heavy than others in class (221 grams)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather proof
lighter than competition in class (155 grams)
no articulating screen
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Sports photography with Olympus XZ-10
Sports photography with Olympus TG-310
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with tracking autofocus
low fps (5.0 frames per second)
resolution not great (12MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
no phase detect autofocus
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good megapixels (14 megapixels)
provides tracking autofocus
weather proof
slow continuous shooting (1.0 frames per second)
lack of shutter priority mode
very small sensor (1/2.3")
bad battery life (150 CIPA)
doesn't have phase detect AF
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Olympus XZ-10 Travel photography highlights
Olympus TG-310 Travel photography highlights
has built in flash
quite wide (26mm)
fast maximum aperture (f1.8)
lack of Timelapse mode
more heavy than others in class (221 grams)
resolution not great (12 megapixels)
display is not selfie friendly
lighter than competition in class (155 grams)
weather proof
good megapixels (14 megapixels)
has built in flash
quite wide (28mm)
missing Time Lapse mode
bad battery life (150 CIPA)
does not posses selfie friendly display
sluggish max aperture (f3.9)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Landscape photography with Olympus XZ-10
Landscape photography with Olympus TG-310
focusing manually
quite wide (26mm)
fast maximum aperture (f1.8)
good sized screen (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
saves RAW formats
can't change lens (fixed lens mount)
resolution not great (12MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lack of Timelapse mode
quite wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good megapixels (14MP)
weather proof
lack of manual focus
cannot swap lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.9)
screen is small (2.7")
lack of manual exposure
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
bad battery life (150 CIPA)
missing Time Lapse mode
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Vlogging with Olympus XZ-10
Vlogging with Olympus TG-310
quite wide (26mm)
fast maximum aperture (f1.8)
touch screen
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with face detection autofocus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
display is not selfie friendly
lack of external microphone socket
more heavy than others in class (221 grams)
quite wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides face detection focusing
lighter than competition in class (155g)
sluggish max aperture (f3.9)
does not posses selfie friendly display
low res video (1280 x 720 pxls)
missing external mic support
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus XZ-10 vs Olympus TG-310 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | Olympus TG-310 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model | Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | Olympus TG-310 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2013-01-30 | 2011-01-06 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | TruePic III+ |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Max resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 35 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/1.8-2.7 | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of display | 920 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 30 secs | 4 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 5.0 frames per sec | 1.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 4.20 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps, 18Mbps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps, 9Mbps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 221g (0.49 lb) | 155g (0.34 lb) |
| Dimensions | 102 x 61 x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 photos | 150 photos |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | Li-50B | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail price | $428 | $0 |
