Olympus XZ-10 vs Olympus TG-810
91 Imaging
36 Features
57 Overall
44
92 Imaging
37 Features
37 Overall
37
Olympus XZ-10 vs Olympus TG-810 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F1.8-2.7) lens
- 221g - 102 x 61 x 34mm
- Introduced January 2013
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 215g - 100 x 65 x 26mm
- Introduced August 2011
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus XZ-10 vs Olympus TG-810 Overview
Lets look much closer at the Olympus XZ-10 versus Olympus TG-810, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof and both of them are manufactured by Olympus. The image resolution of the XZ-10 (12MP) and the TG-810 (14MP) is very close and they enjoy the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe XZ-10 was introduced 18 months later than the TG-810 making the cameras a generation apart from one another. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving through a more detailed comparison, below is a concise view of how the XZ-10 matches up vs the TG-810 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus XZ-10 vs Olympus TG-810 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus XZ-10 and Olympus TG-810. The whole galleries are available at Olympus XZ-10 Gallery and Olympus TG-810 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-10 over the Olympus TG-810
| XZ-10 | TG-810 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2013 |  | August 2011 | Fresher by 18 months |
| Manually focus |  | Dial exact focus | ||
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-810 over the Olympus XZ-10
| TG-810 | XZ-10 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-10 and Olympus TG-810
| XZ-10 | TG-810 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display sizing |
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 920k | Exact same display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-10 vs Olympus TG-810 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to carry your camera frequently, you need to factor its weight and size. The Olympus XZ-10 has external dimensions of 102mm x 61mm x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") having a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs) while the Olympus TG-810 has specifications of 100mm x 65mm x 26mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 1.0") and a weight of 215 grams (0.47 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus XZ-10 versus Olympus TG-810 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are working with during that time. Below is the front view physical size comparison of the XZ-10 versus the TG-810.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the XZ-10 and TG-810 is 91 and 92 respectively.
Olympus XZ-10 vs Olympus TG-810 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its difficult to visualise the contrast in sensor sizing just by looking through technical specs. The photograph underneath may provide you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the XZ-10 and TG-810.
As you can tell, each of these cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but not the same MP. You should expect to see the Olympus TG-810 to render greater detail using its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop pics much more aggressively. The fresher XZ-10 will have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus XZ-10 vs Olympus TG-810 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Olympus XZ-10 vs Olympus TG-810 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | Olympus TG-810 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model | Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | Olympus TG-810 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2013-01-30 | 2011-08-16 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | TruePic III+ |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 35 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/1.8-2.7 | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 3cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 920 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT Hypercrystal III Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 30s | 4s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 5.0fps | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 4.20 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps, 18Mbps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps, 9Mbps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 221 gr (0.49 pounds) | 215 gr (0.47 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 102 x 61 x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 100 x 65 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 pictures | 220 pictures |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | Li-50B | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $428 | $428 |
