Olympus XZ-10 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS
91 Imaging
36 Features
57 Overall
44
92 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
Olympus XZ-10 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F1.8-2.7) lens
- 221g - 102 x 61 x 34mm
- Announced January 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
- Released February 2012
Olympus XZ-10 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Overview
On this page, we will be comparing the Olympus XZ-10 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof and they are both designed by Olympus. The resolution of the XZ-10 (12MP) and the TG-820 iHS (12MP) is relatively similar and both cameras boast the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe XZ-10 was brought out 12 months later than the TG-820 iHS so they are both of a similar age. The two cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting into a complete comparison, here is a quick view of how the XZ-10 grades versus the TG-820 iHS with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus XZ-10 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus XZ-10 & Olympus TG-820 iHS. The entire galleries are available at Olympus XZ-10 Gallery & Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-10 over the Olympus TG-820 iHS
XZ-10 | TG-820 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2013 | February 2012 | More recent by 12 months | |
Focus manually | Dial accurate focusing | |||
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Olympus XZ-10
TG-820 iHS | XZ-10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 1030k | 920k | Clearer screen (+110k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus XZ-10 and Olympus TG-820 iHS
XZ-10 | TG-820 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen measurement | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-10 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to lug around your camera often, you will want to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus XZ-10 enjoys outer dimensions of 102mm x 61mm x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-820 iHS has measurements of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") having a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus XZ-10 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are working with at that time. Following is a front view proportions comparison of the XZ-10 vs the TG-820 iHS.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the XZ-10 and TG-820 iHS is 91 and 92 respectively.
Olympus XZ-10 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is difficult to envision the contrast between sensor measurements just by going over a spec sheet. The photograph below may give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the XZ-10 and TG-820 iHS.
Clearly, both of those cameras have the same sensor dimensions and the identical resolution so you can expect similar quality of photos however you should always factor the launch date of the products into consideration. The younger XZ-10 will have an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus XZ-10 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus XZ-10 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Specifications
Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | Olympus TG-820 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | Olympus TG-820 iHS |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Announced | 2013-01-30 | 2012-02-08 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | TruePic VI |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Peak resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3968 x 2976 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 35 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/1.8-2.7 | f/3.9-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 920k dots | 1,030k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display tech | - | HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 30 seconds | 4 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 5.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 3.50 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps, 18Mbps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps, 9Mbps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 221g (0.49 lbs) | 206g (0.45 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 102 x 61 x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 images | 220 images |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | Li-50B | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | One | One |
Price at release | $428 | $500 |