Olympus XZ-10 vs Olympus TG-4
91 Imaging
36 Features
57 Overall
44
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/82a12/82a1263e2fcea5ac4d6bef1198741cbea2097fd0" alt="Olympus Stylus XZ-10 front Olympus Stylus XZ-10 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/07841/0784163336d0cb666d56989c0f306f52fdaab95d" alt="Olympus Tough TG-4 front Olympus Tough TG-4 front"
90 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
Olympus XZ-10 vs Olympus TG-4 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F1.8-2.7) lens
- 221g - 102 x 61 x 34mm
- Announced January 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Released April 2015
- Old Model is Olympus TG-3
- Successor is Olympus TG-5
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus XZ-10 vs Olympus TG-4 Overview
Let's look much closer at the Olympus XZ-10 vs Olympus TG-4, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Waterproof and both of them are built by Olympus. There exists a huge gap among the sensor resolutions of the XZ-10 (12MP) and TG-4 (16MP) but both cameras posses the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
The XZ-10 was unveiled 3 years prior to the TG-4 which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going right into a thorough comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the XZ-10 grades against the TG-4 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus XZ-10 vs Olympus TG-4 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus XZ-10 and Olympus Tough TG-4. The full galleries are provided at Olympus XZ-10 Gallery and Olympus TG-4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-10 over the Olympus TG-4
XZ-10 | TG-4 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 460k | Crisper screen (+460k dot) |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-4 over the Olympus XZ-10
TG-4 | XZ-10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | April 2015 | ![]() | January 2013 | More modern by 26 months |
Common features in the Olympus XZ-10 and Olympus TG-4
XZ-10 | TG-4 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More exact focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same screen dimensions |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither provides selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-10 vs Olympus TG-4 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to carry around your camera, you are going to need to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus XZ-10 provides outer measurements of 102mm x 61mm x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") and a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-4 has measurements of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") having a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus XZ-10 vs Olympus TG-4 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Underneath is a front view dimension comparison of the XZ-10 vs the TG-4.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2437d/2437d21da53260958a722ae9cdb8149269d83a58" alt="Olympus XZ-10 vs Olympus TG-4 size comparison Olympus XZ-10 vs Olympus TG-4 size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the XZ-10 and TG-4 is 91 and 90 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/58f81/58f81583eae58f768349160322fe5d1555297340" alt="Olympus XZ-10 vs Olympus TG-4 top view buttons comparison Olympus XZ-10 vs Olympus TG-4 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus XZ-10 vs Olympus TG-4 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is tough to visualize the contrast in sensor sizes merely by checking out specs. The image below might give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the XZ-10 and TG-4.
All in all, the two cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit different resolution. You should count on the Olympus TG-4 to produce extra detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The more aged XZ-10 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8eb06/8eb06287d3c731105a9c672c0eec7765a7b225b5" alt="Olympus XZ-10 vs Olympus TG-4 sensor size comparison Olympus XZ-10 vs Olympus TG-4 sensor size comparison"
Olympus XZ-10 vs Olympus TG-4 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a8d1a/a8d1a65bcbd933c2cfca058d14dd319b553c6bb6" alt="Olympus XZ-10 vs Olympus TG-4 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus XZ-10 vs Olympus TG-4 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus XZ-10 vs Olympus TG-4 Specifications
Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | Olympus Tough TG-4 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | Olympus Tough TG-4 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Announced | 2013-01-30 | 2015-04-13 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/1.8-2.7 | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 920 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 30 seconds | 4 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 5.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | - | 7.90 m (at ISO 1600) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps, 18Mbps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps, 9Mbps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264, Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 221g (0.49 pounds) | 247g (0.54 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 102 x 61 x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 photographs | 380 photographs |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | Li-50B | LI-92B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Retail cost | $428 | $379 |