Olympus XZ-10 vs Olympus VR-320
91 Imaging
36 Features
57 Overall
44
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/82a12/82a1263e2fcea5ac4d6bef1198741cbea2097fd0" alt="Olympus Stylus XZ-10 front Olympus Stylus XZ-10 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b7e98/b7e986b748f8a3574682ef0ffce60a8d7bbbe4e3" alt="Olympus VR-320 front Olympus VR-320 front"
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
Olympus XZ-10 vs Olympus VR-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F1.8-2.7) lens
- 221g - 102 x 61 x 34mm
- Announced January 2013
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Revealed July 2011
- Refreshed by Olympus VR-330
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus XZ-10 vs Olympus VR-320 Overview
Below is a detailed review of the Olympus XZ-10 vs Olympus VR-320, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both are manufactured by Olympus. The sensor resolution of the XZ-10 (12MP) and the VR-320 (14MP) is fairly close and both cameras posses the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The XZ-10 was brought out 19 months later than the VR-320 making them a generation apart from one another. The two cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the XZ-10 matches up vs the VR-320 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus XZ-10 vs Olympus VR-320 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus XZ-10 and Olympus VR-320. The entire galleries are available at Olympus XZ-10 Gallery and Olympus VR-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-10 over the Olympus VR-320
XZ-10 | VR-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2013 | ![]() | July 2011 | More recent by 19 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing | ||
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+690k dot) |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Olympus XZ-10
VR-320 | XZ-10 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-10 and Olympus VR-320
XZ-10 | VR-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal display measurement |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither features selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-10 vs Olympus VR-320 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to lug around your camera often, you need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus XZ-10 enjoys external measurements of 102mm x 61mm x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") with a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs) whilst the Olympus VR-320 has proportions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus XZ-10 vs Olympus VR-320 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have attached at the time. Here is a front view overall size comparison of the XZ-10 and the VR-320.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b302a/b302af977c8027d2341e09b6e6072eb85dd33af6" alt="Olympus XZ-10 vs Olympus VR-320 size comparison Olympus XZ-10 vs Olympus VR-320 size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the XZ-10 and VR-320 is 91 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3cb52/3cb521c12f6b69b2850d83fdb09783cd1357e3d8" alt="Olympus XZ-10 vs Olympus VR-320 top view buttons comparison Olympus XZ-10 vs Olympus VR-320 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus XZ-10 vs Olympus VR-320 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very hard to visualize the contrast in sensor measurements just by looking through a spec sheet. The graphic below will offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the XZ-10 and VR-320.
Clearly, both of these cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but different resolution. You should anticipate the Olympus VR-320 to result in extra detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop pics more aggressively. The more recent XZ-10 provides an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0392a/0392a51ac6abcba3645f3b8b41e9da38f0cc25c9" alt="Olympus XZ-10 vs Olympus VR-320 sensor size comparison Olympus XZ-10 vs Olympus VR-320 sensor size comparison"
Olympus XZ-10 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d05b8/d05b8c345e7f3f3d708fa0eb406914cbb5639289" alt="Olympus XZ-10 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus XZ-10 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus XZ-10 vs Olympus VR-320 Specifications
Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | Olympus VR-320 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | Olympus VR-320 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2013-01-30 | 2011-07-19 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | TruePic III |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Max resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4288 x 3216 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 35 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
Maximum aperture | f/1.8-2.7 | f/3.0-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 920k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 30 seconds | 4 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 5.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 4.70 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps, 18Mbps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps, 9Mbps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 221 gr (0.49 lbs) | 158 gr (0.35 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 102 x 61 x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 shots | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | Li-50B | LI-42B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at release | $428 | $179 |