Olympus XZ-10 vs Panasonic FH25
91 Imaging
36 Features
57 Overall
44
94 Imaging
39 Features
26 Overall
33
Olympus XZ-10 vs Panasonic FH25 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F1.8-2.7) lens
- 221g - 102 x 61 x 34mm
- Introduced January 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-224mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 159g - 99 x 57 x 28mm
- Announced January 2011
- Also referred to as Lumix DMC-FS35
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus XZ-10 vs Panasonic FH25 Overview
Following is a extensive review of the Olympus XZ-10 versus Panasonic FH25, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by companies Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a sizeable gap between the resolutions of the XZ-10 (12MP) and FH25 (16MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe XZ-10 was launched 2 years after the FH25 which is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going into a complete comparison, here is a quick summary of how the XZ-10 matches up against the FH25 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus XZ-10 vs Panasonic FH25 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus XZ-10 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH25. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus XZ-10 Gallery and Panasonic FH25 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-10 over the Panasonic FH25
| XZ-10 | FH25 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2013 |  | January 2011 | More modern by 26 months |
| Manually focus |  | Dial accurate focusing | ||
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+690k dot) |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FH25 over the Olympus XZ-10
| FH25 | XZ-10 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-10 and Panasonic FH25
| XZ-10 | FH25 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-10 vs Panasonic FH25 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to carry around your camera often, you should consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus XZ-10 has got exterior dimensions of 102mm x 61mm x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") along with a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FH25 has dimensions of 99mm x 57mm x 28mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.1") along with a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus XZ-10 versus Panasonic FH25 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you use at that moment. Underneath is a front view measurements comparison of the XZ-10 and the FH25.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the XZ-10 and FH25 is 91 and 94 respectively.
Olympus XZ-10 vs Panasonic FH25 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's difficult to imagine the difference between sensor sizes simply by reviewing specifications. The pic underneath will help provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the XZ-10 and FH25.
Plainly, each of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different megapixels. You should anticipate the Panasonic FH25 to offer you more detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also let you crop pics a bit more aggressively. The fresher XZ-10 should have an edge in sensor tech.
Olympus XZ-10 vs Panasonic FH25 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Olympus XZ-10 vs Panasonic FH25 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH25 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model type | Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH25 |
| Alternate name | - | Lumix DMC-FS35 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2013-01-30 | 2011-01-05 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | Venus Engine VI |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | 35 | 11 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 28-224mm (8.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/1.8-2.7 | f/3.3-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Display resolution | 920k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display tech | - | TFT Screen LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 30s | 60s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1600s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 5.0 frames per sec | 4.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 5.80 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps, 18Mbps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps, 9Mbps) | 1280 x 720p (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 221 grams (0.49 lb) | 159 grams (0.35 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 102 x 61 x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 99 x 57 x 28mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 pictures | 250 pictures |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | Li-50B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail pricing | $428 | $180 |
