Olympus XZ-10 vs Panasonic FS42
91 Imaging
36 Features
57 Overall
44
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/82a12/82a1263e2fcea5ac4d6bef1198741cbea2097fd0" alt="Olympus Stylus XZ-10 front Olympus Stylus XZ-10 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f9979/f9979d6158b07faa33963a04f4938253f5f9ce99" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 front"
95 Imaging
33 Features
10 Overall
23
Olympus XZ-10 vs Panasonic FS42 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F1.8-2.7) lens
- 221g - 102 x 61 x 34mm
- Launched January 2013
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1000 (Boost to 6400)
- 640 x 480 video
- 33-132mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 132g - 98 x 55 x 22mm
- Revealed April 2009
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus XZ-10 vs Panasonic FS42 Overview
In this write-up, we are evaluating the Olympus XZ-10 vs Panasonic FS42, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Ultracompact by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. The resolution of the XZ-10 (12MP) and the FS42 (10MP) is very similar but the XZ-10 (1/2.3") and FS42 (1/2.5") come with totally different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
The XZ-10 was manufactured 3 years later than the FS42 and that is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Olympus XZ-10 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic FS42 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a brief overview of how the XZ-10 grades versus the FS42 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus XZ-10 vs Panasonic FS42 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus XZ-10 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus XZ-10 Gallery and Panasonic FS42 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-10 over the Panasonic FS42
XZ-10 | FS42 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2013 | ![]() | April 2009 | Fresher by 47 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | More accurate focusing | ||
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+690k dot) |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FS42 over the Olympus XZ-10
FS42 | XZ-10 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-10 and Panasonic FS42
XZ-10 | FS42 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-10 vs Panasonic FS42 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to carry your camera often, you are going to need to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus XZ-10 offers outside dimensions of 102mm x 61mm x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs) while the Panasonic FS42 has specifications of 98mm x 55mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") along with a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs).
See the Olympus XZ-10 vs Panasonic FS42 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Underneath is the front view scale comparison of the XZ-10 compared to the FS42.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/98dd5/98dd537a781edaf8bded9f602fbee1b2243b0a8d" alt="Olympus XZ-10 vs Panasonic FS42 size comparison Olympus XZ-10 vs Panasonic FS42 size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the XZ-10 and FS42 is 91 and 95 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b1d83/b1d83f513e8c387bbc515b699924da30fd401ea1" alt="Olympus XZ-10 vs Panasonic FS42 top view buttons comparison Olympus XZ-10 vs Panasonic FS42 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus XZ-10 vs Panasonic FS42 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very tough to see the gap between sensor sizing just by reviewing a spec sheet. The visual below should provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the XZ-10 and FS42.
As you can see, both cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The XZ-10 because of its larger sensor will make shooting shallower DOF easier and the Olympus XZ-10 will offer you extra detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop images far more aggressively. The younger XZ-10 is going to have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0d8a4/0d8a430c7068e312aa840cb7b674ec3b095142a7" alt="Olympus XZ-10 vs Panasonic FS42 sensor size comparison Olympus XZ-10 vs Panasonic FS42 sensor size comparison"
Olympus XZ-10 vs Panasonic FS42 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0479c/0479cfcb03eb691cd777f1a77621879376e7bf60" alt="Olympus XZ-10 vs Panasonic FS42 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus XZ-10 vs Panasonic FS42 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus XZ-10 vs Panasonic FS42 Specifications
Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
Launched | 2013-01-30 | 2009-04-17 |
Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.5" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 5.744 x 4.308mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 24.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3648 x 2736 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 1000 |
Max boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 33-132mm (4.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/1.8-2.7 | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 6.3 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | 2.5 inch |
Resolution of screen | 920 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 30 seconds | 60 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 5.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | - | 6.30 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps, 18Mbps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps, 9Mbps) | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 221 gr (0.49 lb) | 132 gr (0.29 lb) |
Dimensions | 102 x 61 x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 98 x 55 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 photos | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | Li-50B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Price at launch | $428 | $580 |