Olympus XZ-10 vs Panasonic FZ2500
91 Imaging
36 Features
57 Overall
44


53 Imaging
52 Features
81 Overall
63
Olympus XZ-10 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F1.8-2.7) lens
- 221g - 102 x 61 x 34mm
- Launched January 2013
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Push to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 4096 x 2160 video
- 24-480mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 915g - 138 x 102 x 135mm
- Announced September 2016
- Alternative Name is Lumix DMC-FZ2000
- Old Model is Panasonic FZ1000

Olympus XZ-10 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Overview
Below, we are looking at the Olympus XZ-10 and Panasonic FZ2500, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Large Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a significant gap among the image resolutions of the XZ-10 (12MP) and FZ2500 (20MP) and the XZ-10 (1/2.3") and FZ2500 (1") feature different sensor size.

The XZ-10 was introduced 4 years prior to the FZ2500 which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus XZ-10 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic FZ2500 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before getting in to a in-depth comparison, below is a short highlight of how the XZ-10 matches up versus the FZ2500 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Olympus XZ-10 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus XZ-10 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500. The whole galleries are available at Olympus XZ-10 Gallery and Panasonic FZ2500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-10 over the Panasonic FZ2500
XZ-10 | FZ2500 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ2500 over the Olympus XZ-10
FZ2500 | XZ-10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | September 2016 | ![]() | January 2013 | More modern by 44 months |
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Display resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 920k | Clearer display (+120k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Olympus XZ-10 and Panasonic FZ2500
XZ-10 | FZ2500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More exact focus | ||
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical display size |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Olympus XZ-10 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to carry around your camera regularly, you have to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus XZ-10 has physical dimensions of 102mm x 61mm x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") and a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FZ2500 has sizing of 138mm x 102mm x 135mm (5.4" x 4.0" x 5.3") with a weight of 915 grams (2.02 lbs).
Look at the Olympus XZ-10 and Panasonic FZ2500 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Underneath is the front view proportions comparison of the XZ-10 and the FZ2500.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the XZ-10 and FZ2500 is 91 and 53 respectively.

Olympus XZ-10 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's tough to picture the difference in sensor sizes merely by researching specifications. The image here should provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the XZ-10 and FZ2500.
To sum up, both of these cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The XZ-10 with its smaller sensor is going to make getting bokeh harder and the Panasonic FZ2500 will result in more detail using its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop images much more aggressively. The more aged XZ-10 will be behind in sensor tech.

Olympus XZ-10 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus XZ-10 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Specifications
Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500 |
Also referred to as | - | Lumix DMC-FZ2000 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2013-01-30 | 2016-09-19 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 5472 x 3648 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW photos | ||
Min boosted ISO | - | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 24-480mm (20.0x) |
Max aperture | f/1.8-2.7 | f/2.8-4.5 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 3cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 920 thousand dots | 1,040 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.74x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 30s | 60s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Maximum quiet shutter speed | - | 1/16000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 5.0 frames/s | 12.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | - | 13.20 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync, Slow Sync/Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps, 18Mbps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps, 9Mbps) | 4096 x 2060 @ 24p / 100 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 4096x2160 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 221 gr (0.49 lb) | 915 gr (2.02 lb) |
Dimensions | 102 x 61 x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 138 x 102 x 135mm (5.4" x 4.0" x 5.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 70 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.0 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.6 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 538 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 shots | 350 shots |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | Li-50B | DMW-BLC12 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3 shots @ 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $428 | $998 |