Olympus XZ-10 vs Pentax K-S1
91 Imaging
36 Features
57 Overall
44
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/82a12/82a1263e2fcea5ac4d6bef1198741cbea2097fd0" alt="Olympus Stylus XZ-10 front Olympus Stylus XZ-10 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/266d9/266d9ffc5e63d8d40ff406fb10a7ee8ffc3b06b2" alt="Pentax K-S1 front Pentax K-S1 front"
69 Imaging
63 Features
70 Overall
65
Olympus XZ-10 vs Pentax K-S1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F1.8-2.7) lens
- 221g - 102 x 61 x 34mm
- Announced January 2013
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 51200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/6000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 558g - 121 x 93 x 70mm
- Released August 2014
- Successor is Pentax K-S2
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus XZ-10 vs Pentax K-S1 Overview
Here, we are evaluating the Olympus XZ-10 versus Pentax K-S1, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Advanced DSLR by manufacturers Olympus and Pentax. There exists a huge gap between the sensor resolutions of the XZ-10 (12MP) and K-S1 (20MP) and the XZ-10 (1/2.3") and K-S1 (APS-C) posses different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The XZ-10 was launched 19 months prior to the K-S1 making them a generation away from one another. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus XZ-10 being a Compact camera and the Pentax K-S1 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before delving right into a in depth comparison, here is a short summary of how the XZ-10 grades vs the K-S1 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus XZ-10 vs Pentax K-S1 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus XZ-10 and Pentax K-S1. The complete galleries are available at Olympus XZ-10 Gallery and Pentax K-S1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-10 over the Pentax K-S1
XZ-10 | K-S1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax K-S1 over the Olympus XZ-10
K-S1 | XZ-10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | August 2014 | ![]() | January 2013 | More modern by 19 months |
Display resolution | 921k | ![]() | 920k | Sharper display (+1k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus XZ-10 and Pentax K-S1
XZ-10 | K-S1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very exact focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same display measurement |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither includes selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-10 vs Pentax K-S1 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to carry around your camera, you are going to need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus XZ-10 features exterior dimensions of 102mm x 61mm x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") and a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs) whilst the Pentax K-S1 has dimensions of 121mm x 93mm x 70mm (4.8" x 3.7" x 2.8") with a weight of 558 grams (1.23 lbs).
See the Olympus XZ-10 versus Pentax K-S1 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you select at that time. The following is a front view measurements comparison of the XZ-10 against the K-S1.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0aaa5/0aaa5094374a332f2794cd93c0a4255e1e321c21" alt="Olympus XZ-10 vs Pentax K-S1 size comparison Olympus XZ-10 vs Pentax K-S1 size comparison"
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the XZ-10 and K-S1 is 91 and 69 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5bef9/5bef95519e1b91f762334e01936fd117fc236aa7" alt="Olympus XZ-10 vs Pentax K-S1 top view buttons comparison Olympus XZ-10 vs Pentax K-S1 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus XZ-10 vs Pentax K-S1 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its hard to visualize the gap between sensor sizes only by checking technical specs. The image underneath will help offer you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the XZ-10 and K-S1.
As you can tell, both of the cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The XZ-10 featuring a tinier sensor is going to make shooting bokeh tougher and the Pentax K-S1 will resolve extra detail utilizing its extra 8MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop pics way more aggressively. The more aged XZ-10 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/61e53/61e53fa6fa6c46963b9a78298e6bbf452ffbaf59" alt="Olympus XZ-10 vs Pentax K-S1 sensor size comparison Olympus XZ-10 vs Pentax K-S1 sensor size comparison"
Olympus XZ-10 vs Pentax K-S1 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/05822/058225bb3e73e1b15ff6d09c0ab8386c9bd9c0cd" alt="Olympus XZ-10 vs Pentax K-S1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus XZ-10 vs Pentax K-S1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus XZ-10 vs Pentax K-S1 Specifications
Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | Pentax K-S1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Pentax |
Model | Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | Pentax K-S1 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced DSLR |
Announced | 2013-01-30 | 2014-08-27 |
Body design | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Prime MII |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
Max resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 5472 x 3648 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 51200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Pentax KAF2 |
Lens focal range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | - |
Maximum aperture | f/1.8-2.7 | - |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Number of lenses | - | 151 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 920 thousand dot | 921 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.64x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 30 seconds | 30 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/6000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 5.0 frames/s | 5.4 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | - | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, auto + redeye, on, on + redeye reduction, slow sync, trailing curtain sync, manual |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps, 18Mbps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps, 9Mbps) | 1920 x 1080 (30,25,24 fps), 1280 x 720 (60,50 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 221g (0.49 lbs) | 558g (1.23 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 102 x 61 x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 121 x 93 x 70mm (4.8" x 3.7" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 78 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.5 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 13.0 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 1061 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 photos | 410 photos |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | Li-50B | D-LI109 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes ( 2 or 12 seconds) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail pricing | $428 | $339 |