Olympus XZ-10 vs Pentax WG-2
91 Imaging
36 Features
57 Overall
44
91 Imaging
39 Features
37 Overall
38
Olympus XZ-10 vs Pentax WG-2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F1.8-2.7) lens
- 221g - 102 x 61 x 34mm
- Announced January 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 192g - 122 x 61 x 30mm
- Announced February 2012
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus XZ-10 vs Pentax WG-2 Overview
The following is a thorough analysis of the Olympus XZ-10 vs Pentax WG-2, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by manufacturers Olympus and Pentax. There is a noticeable difference between the resolutions of the XZ-10 (12MP) and WG-2 (16MP) but both cameras have the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe XZ-10 was launched 12 months after the WG-2 which means that they are of a similar age. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the XZ-10 scores versus the WG-2 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus XZ-10 vs Pentax WG-2 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus XZ-10 & Pentax Optio WG-2. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus XZ-10 Gallery & Pentax WG-2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-10 over the Pentax WG-2
| XZ-10 | WG-2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2013 | February 2012 | Newer by 12 months | |
| Screen resolution | 920k | 460k | Sharper screen (+460k dot) | |
| Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-2 over the Olympus XZ-10
| WG-2 | XZ-10 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-10 and Pentax WG-2
| XZ-10 | WG-2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | More exact focusing | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen measurement | |
| Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-10 vs Pentax WG-2 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you'll have to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus XZ-10 comes with exterior measurements of 102mm x 61mm x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") with a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs) whilst the Pentax WG-2 has sizing of 122mm x 61mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 192 grams (0.42 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus XZ-10 vs Pentax WG-2 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have at that time. Below is a front view measurement comparison of the XZ-10 against the WG-2.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the XZ-10 and WG-2 is 91 and 91 respectively.
Olympus XZ-10 vs Pentax WG-2 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is tough to envision the gap between sensor dimensions merely by reading a spec sheet. The pic below will offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the XZ-10 and WG-2.
As you can see, both of those cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit not the same resolution. You can count on the Pentax WG-2 to offer you extra detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The more modern XZ-10 is going to have a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus XZ-10 vs Pentax WG-2 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Olympus XZ-10 vs Pentax WG-2 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | Pentax Optio WG-2 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Pentax |
| Model | Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | Pentax Optio WG-2 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2013-01-30 | 2012-02-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 35 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/1.8-2.7 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 920 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen tech | - | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 30s | 4s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 5.0fps | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 5.40 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps, 18Mbps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps, 9Mbps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 221 gr (0.49 pounds) | 192 gr (0.42 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 102 x 61 x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 122 x 61 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 pictures | 260 pictures |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | Li-50B | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $428 | $350 |