Olympus XZ-10 vs Pentax WG-10
91 Imaging
35 Features
57 Overall
43
93 Imaging
37 Features
34 Overall
35
Olympus XZ-10 vs Pentax WG-10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F1.8-2.7) lens
- 221g - 102 x 61 x 34mm
- Introduced January 2013
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 167g - 116 x 59 x 29mm
- Introduced June 2013
Photography Glossary Olympus XZ-10 vs Pentax WG-10 Overview
On this page, we are analyzing the Olympus XZ-10 versus Pentax WG-10, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by brands Olympus and Pentax. The image resolution of the XZ-10 (12MP) and the WG-10 (14MP) is very close and both cameras provide the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe XZ-10 was released 4 months prior to the WG-10 which means that they are both of a similar age. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go into a comprehensive comparison, here is a brief view of how the XZ-10 scores vs the WG-10 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus XZ-10 vs Pentax WG-10 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus XZ-10 & Pentax WG-10. The complete galleries are available at Olympus XZ-10 Gallery & Pentax WG-10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-10 over the Pentax WG-10
| XZ-10 | WG-10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 920k | 230k | Clearer display (+690k dot) | |
| Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-10 over the Olympus XZ-10
| WG-10 | XZ-10 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-10 and Pentax WG-10
| XZ-10 | WG-10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2013 | June 2013 | Same age | |
| Focus manually | Very accurate focusing | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-10 vs Pentax WG-10 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to lug around your camera frequently, you are going to need to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus XZ-10 provides exterior measurements of 102mm x 61mm x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") along with a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs) and the Pentax WG-10 has measurements of 116mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.6" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus XZ-10 versus Pentax WG-10 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are using at the time. Below is a front view size comparison of the XZ-10 against the WG-10.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the XZ-10 and WG-10 is 91 and 93 respectively.
Olympus XZ-10 vs Pentax WG-10 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very hard to imagine the difference in sensor measurements purely by viewing technical specs. The graphic underneath will provide you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the XZ-10 and WG-10.
As you have seen, the 2 cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different MP. You can expect to see the Pentax WG-10 to provide you with more detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop pics a bit more aggressively.
Olympus XZ-10 vs Pentax WG-10 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Olympus XZ-10 vs Pentax WG-10 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | Pentax WG-10 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Pentax |
| Model | Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | Pentax WG-10 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2013-01-30 | 2013-06-21 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 35 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/1.8-2.7 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 920 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen tech | - | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 30s | 4s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames/s | 0.7 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 1.20 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps, 18Mbps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps, 9Mbps) | 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 221 gr (0.49 lbs) | 167 gr (0.37 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 102 x 61 x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 116 x 59 x 29mm (4.6" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 shots | 260 shots |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | Li-50B | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $428 | $0 |