Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh CX1
91 Imaging
36 Features
57 Overall
44
93 Imaging
32 Features
30 Overall
31
Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh CX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F1.8-2.7) lens
- 221g - 102 x 61 x 34mm
- Introduced January 2013
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-200mm (F3.3-5.2) lens
- 180g - 102 x 58 x 28mm
- Revealed February 2009
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh CX1 Overview
Let's look more in depth at the Olympus XZ-10 versus Ricoh CX1, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by rivals Olympus and Ricoh. There is a noticeable difference among the image resolutions of the XZ-10 (12MP) and CX1 (9MP) but both cameras offer the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingThe XZ-10 was launched 4 years after the CX1 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving into a comprehensive comparison, here is a quick view of how the XZ-10 matches up vs the CX1 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh CX1 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus XZ-10 & Ricoh CX1. The complete galleries are available at Olympus XZ-10 Gallery & Ricoh CX1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-10 over the Ricoh CX1
| XZ-10 | CX1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2013 |  | February 2009 | Newer by 49 months |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX1 over the Olympus XZ-10
| CX1 | XZ-10 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-10 and Ricoh CX1
| XZ-10 | CX1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial precise focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display measurements |
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 920k | Exact same display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh CX1 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to travel with your camera, you will have to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus XZ-10 comes with exterior measurements of 102mm x 61mm x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") with a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs) and the Ricoh CX1 has sizing of 102mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 180 grams (0.40 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus XZ-10 versus Ricoh CX1 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you select at the time. Underneath is a front view scale comparison of the XZ-10 vs the CX1.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the XZ-10 and CX1 is 91 and 93 respectively.
Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh CX1 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be hard to see the contrast in sensor dimensions just by viewing a spec sheet. The picture here may give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the XZ-10 and CX1.
Clearly, each of these cameras have the same sensor dimensions but not the same MP. You can anticipate the Olympus XZ-10 to provide you with greater detail utilizing its extra 3MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop pics a bit more aggressively. The more modern XZ-10 is going to have an advantage in sensor innovation.
Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh CX1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh CX1 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | Ricoh CX1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | Ricoh CX1 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2013-01-30 | 2009-02-19 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 9MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3456 x 2592 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 35 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 28-200mm (7.1x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/1.8-2.7 | f/3.3-5.2 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 920 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 30s | 8s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 3.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps, 18Mbps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps, 9Mbps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 221g (0.49 lb) | 180g (0.40 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 102 x 61 x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 102 x 58 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 images | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | Li-50B | DB-70 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Price at launch | $428 | $299 |
