Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh GR
91 Imaging
36 Features
57 Overall
44
90 Imaging
57 Features
54 Overall
55
Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh GR Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F1.8-2.7) lens
- 221g - 102 x 61 x 34mm
- Launched January 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8) lens
- 245g - 117 x 61 x 35mm
- Announced April 2013
- Newer Model is Ricoh GR II
Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh GR Overview
Here, we are contrasting the Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh GR, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Large Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a big gap between the sensor resolutions of the XZ-10 (12MP) and GR (16MP) and the XZ-10 (1/2.3") and GR (APS-C) offer totally different sensor measurements.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe XZ-10 was brought out 2 months prior to the GR which means that they are of a similar generation. Both cameras feature different body design with the Olympus XZ-10 being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GR being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before delving straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a concise summation of how the XZ-10 scores vs the GR when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh GR Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus XZ-10 and Ricoh GR. The entire galleries are available at Olympus XZ-10 Gallery and Ricoh GR Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-10 over the Ricoh GR
XZ-10 | GR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR over the Olympus XZ-10
GR | XZ-10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 1230k | 920k | Sharper display (+310k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus XZ-10 and Ricoh GR
XZ-10 | GR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2013 | April 2013 | Similar generation | |
Focus manually | More precise focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display measurements | |
Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh GR Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you'll have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus XZ-10 enjoys physical dimensions of 102mm x 61mm x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GR has measurements of 117mm x 61mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") with a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Compare the Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh GR in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are utilising at the time. Below is a front view dimensions comparison of the XZ-10 vs the GR.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the XZ-10 and GR is 91 and 90 respectively.
Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh GR Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be difficult to visualise the difference between sensor sizes merely by going over a spec sheet. The picture here will help give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the XZ-10 and GR.
As you can see, each of the cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The XZ-10 because of its tinier sensor will make shooting shallower DOF trickier and the Ricoh GR will offer you greater detail having its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also let you crop images way more aggressively.
Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh GR Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh GR Specifications
Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | Ricoh GR | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model | Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | Ricoh GR |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2013-01-30 | 2013-04-17 |
Body design | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.7 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 372.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4928 x 3264 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
Largest aperture | f/1.8-2.7 | f/2.8 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 920k dot | 1,230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (optional) |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 30 seconds | 300 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 5.0fps | 4.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | - | 5.40 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | - | 1/4000 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps, 18Mbps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps, 9Mbps) | 1920 x 1080 (30, 25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720 ( 60, 50, 30, 25, 24 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25, 24 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 221 grams (0.49 pounds) | 245 grams (0.54 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 102 x 61 x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 117 x 61 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 78 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.6 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 13.5 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 972 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 photos | 290 photos |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | Li-50B | DB65 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD, SDHC, SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $428 | $971 |