Clicky

Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh GR Digital III

Portability
91
Imaging
36
Features
57
Overall
44
Olympus Stylus XZ-10 front
 
Ricoh GR Digital III front
Portability
92
Imaging
34
Features
35
Overall
34

Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Key Specs

Olympus XZ-10
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 26-130mm (F1.8-2.7) lens
  • 221g - 102 x 61 x 34mm
  • Launched January 2013
Ricoh GR Digital III
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28mm (F1.9) lens
  • 208g - 109 x 59 x 26mm
  • Revealed July 2009
  • Successor is Ricoh GR Digital IV
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Overview

Its time to take a closer look at the Olympus XZ-10 and Ricoh GR Digital III, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by rivals Olympus and Ricoh. The resolution of the XZ-10 (12MP) and the GR Digital III (10MP) is pretty comparable but the XZ-10 (1/2.3") and GR Digital III (1/1.7") possess different sensor size.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The XZ-10 was brought out 3 years after the GR Digital III which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).

Before delving through a comprehensive comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the XZ-10 grades against the GR Digital III when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-10 over the Ricoh GR Digital III

 XZ-10 GR Digital III 
RevealedJanuary 2013July 2009More modern by 43 months
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital III over the Olympus XZ-10

 GR Digital III XZ-10 

Common features in the Olympus XZ-10 and Ricoh GR Digital III

 XZ-10 GR Digital III 
Focus manually Very exact focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen sizing3"3"Equivalent screen size
Screen resolution920k920kEqual screen resolution
Selfie screen Neither provides selfie screen

Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Physical Comparison

If you are aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus XZ-10 provides exterior dimensions of 102mm x 61mm x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") and a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs) while the Ricoh GR Digital III has dimensions of 109mm x 59mm x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 208 grams (0.46 lbs).

Examine the Olympus XZ-10 and Ricoh GR Digital III in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have at the time. Here is the front view proportions comparison of the XZ-10 vs the GR Digital III.

Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh GR Digital III size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the XZ-10 and GR Digital III is 91 and 92 respectively.

Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh GR Digital III top view buttons comparison

Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Sensor Comparison

Usually, its tough to imagine the difference in sensor sizes merely by going through specs. The pic underneath will offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the XZ-10 and GR Digital III.

All in all, both cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The XZ-10 due to its smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF tougher and the Olympus XZ-10 will provide more detail having its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will help you crop shots far more aggressively. The newer XZ-10 should have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.

Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh GR Digital III sensor size comparison

Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus XZ-10 Portrait photography information
Ricoh GR Digital III Portrait photography information
45
you can focus manually
offers face detect autofocus
delivers RAW formats
MP count low (12 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
40
has manual focus
saves RAW files
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/1.7")
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Olympus XZ-10 Street photography details
Ricoh GR Digital III Street photography details
61
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW formats
screen is fixed
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
more heavy than competitors (221 grams)
55
saves RAW files
no moving screen
no image stabilization
very small sensor (1/1.7")
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Sports Comparison

Olympus XZ-10 Sports photography highlights
Ricoh GR Digital III Sports photography highlights
34
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
offers tracking focus
max frames per second very slow (5.0 frames/s)
MP count low (12 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect autofocus
17
focal length is fixed (28mm)
no image stabilization
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/1.7")
lacks phase detect auto focus
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Olympus XZ-10 as a Travel photography camera
Ricoh GR Digital III as a Travel photography camera
60
has built in flash
decently wide (26mm)
great max aperture (f1.8)
doesn't have Timelapse mode
more heavy than competitors (221 grams)
MP count low (12 megapixels)
does not have a selfie friendly display
63
built-in flash
great max aperture (f1.9)
low megapixels (10MP)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Olympus XZ-10 Landscape photography features
Ricoh GR Digital III Landscape photography features
53
you can focus manually
decently wide (26mm)
great max aperture (f1.8)
screen size is good (3")
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW formats
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
MP count low (12 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have Timelapse mode
45
has manual focus
great max aperture (f1.9)
decent sized screen (3 inch)
saves RAW files
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
focal length is fixed (28mm)
no image stabilization
low megapixels (10MP)
very small sensor (1/1.7")
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus XZ-10 Vlogging features
Ricoh GR Digital III Vlogging features
35
decently wide (26mm)
great max aperture (f1.8)
has touchscreen
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
offers face detect autofocus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
does not have a selfie friendly display
doesn't have microphone support
more heavy than competitors (221 grams)
25
great max aperture (f1.9)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
no image stabilization
low video resolution (640 x 480 resolution)
does not have external mic support
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus XZ-10 and Ricoh GR Digital III
 Olympus Stylus XZ-10Ricoh GR Digital III
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Ricoh
Model Olympus Stylus XZ-10 Ricoh GR Digital III
Category Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Compact
Launched 2013-01-30 2009-07-27
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by - GR engine III
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/1.7"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 7.44 x 5.58mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 41.5mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 10 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2
Highest resolution 3968 x 2976 3648 x 2736
Highest native ISO 6400 1600
Lowest native ISO 100 64
RAW format
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch focus
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Number of focus points 35 -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 26-130mm (5.0x) 28mm (1x)
Highest aperture f/1.8-2.7 f/1.9
Macro focus range 1cm 1cm
Crop factor 5.8 4.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3 inch 3 inch
Screen resolution 920 thousand dots 920 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Optical (optional)
Features
Slowest shutter speed 30 secs 1 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shooting rate 5.0 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range - 3.00 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps, 18Mbps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps, 9Mbps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps)
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 640x480
Video format MPEG-4, H.264 -
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 221 gr (0.49 lb) 208 gr (0.46 lb)
Dimensions 102 x 61 x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") 109 x 59 x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 240 shots -
Type of battery Battery Pack -
Battery model Li-50B -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC, Internal
Card slots 1 1
Cost at launch $428 $399