Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh GR Digital III
91 Imaging
36 Features
57 Overall
44
92 Imaging
34 Features
35 Overall
34
Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F1.8-2.7) lens
- 221g - 102 x 61 x 34mm
- Launched January 2013
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 208g - 109 x 59 x 26mm
- Revealed July 2009
- Successor is Ricoh GR Digital IV
Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Overview
Its time to take a closer look at the Olympus XZ-10 and Ricoh GR Digital III, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by rivals Olympus and Ricoh. The resolution of the XZ-10 (12MP) and the GR Digital III (10MP) is pretty comparable but the XZ-10 (1/2.3") and GR Digital III (1/1.7") possess different sensor size.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe XZ-10 was brought out 3 years after the GR Digital III which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving through a comprehensive comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the XZ-10 grades against the GR Digital III when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus XZ-10 & Ricoh GR Digital III. The entire galleries are available at Olympus XZ-10 Gallery & Ricoh GR Digital III Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-10 over the Ricoh GR Digital III
XZ-10 | GR Digital III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2013 | July 2009 | More modern by 43 months | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital III over the Olympus XZ-10
GR Digital III | XZ-10 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-10 and Ricoh GR Digital III
XZ-10 | GR Digital III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very exact focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen size | |
Screen resolution | 920k | 920k | Equal screen resolution | |
Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus XZ-10 provides exterior dimensions of 102mm x 61mm x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") and a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs) while the Ricoh GR Digital III has dimensions of 109mm x 59mm x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 208 grams (0.46 lbs).
Examine the Olympus XZ-10 and Ricoh GR Digital III in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have at the time. Here is the front view proportions comparison of the XZ-10 vs the GR Digital III.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the XZ-10 and GR Digital III is 91 and 92 respectively.
Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Sensor Comparison
Usually, its tough to imagine the difference in sensor sizes merely by going through specs. The pic underneath will offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the XZ-10 and GR Digital III.
All in all, both cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The XZ-10 due to its smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF tougher and the Olympus XZ-10 will provide more detail having its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will help you crop shots far more aggressively. The newer XZ-10 should have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Specifications
Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | Ricoh GR Digital III | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model | Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | Ricoh GR Digital III |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2013-01-30 | 2009-07-27 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | GR engine III |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Highest resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 64 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
Highest aperture | f/1.8-2.7 | f/1.9 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 920 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (optional) |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 30 secs | 1 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 5.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | - | 3.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps, 18Mbps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps, 9Mbps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 221 gr (0.49 lb) | 208 gr (0.46 lb) |
Dimensions | 102 x 61 x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 109 x 59 x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 shots | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | Li-50B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $428 | $399 |