Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh GR III
91 Imaging
36 Features
57 Overall
44
90 Imaging
68 Features
62 Overall
65
Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh GR III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F1.8-2.7) lens
- 221g - 102 x 61 x 34mm
- Revealed January 2013
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 102400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8-16) lens
- 257g - 109 x 62 x 33mm
- Announced September 2018
- Old Model is Ricoh GR III
- Replacement is Ricoh GR III
Photography Glossary Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh GR III Overview
Below, we will be looking at the Olympus XZ-10 versus Ricoh GR III, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Ricoh. There is a large difference between the sensor resolutions of the XZ-10 (12MP) and GR III (24MP) and the XZ-10 (1/2.3") and GR III (APS-C) come with totally different sensor measurements.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe XZ-10 was announced 6 years earlier than the GR III which is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Olympus XZ-10 being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GR III being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before we go straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a short introduction of how the XZ-10 matches up vs the GR III in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh GR III Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus XZ-10 & Ricoh GR III. The whole galleries are available at Olympus XZ-10 Gallery & Ricoh GR III Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-10 over the Ricoh GR III
| XZ-10 | GR III |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR III over the Olympus XZ-10
| GR III | XZ-10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | September 2018 | January 2013 | More modern by 68 months | |
| Screen resolution | 1037k | 920k | Crisper screen (+117k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus XZ-10 and Ricoh GR III
| XZ-10 | GR III | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | More exact focus | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen measurements | |
| Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh GR III Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to carry around your camera often, you will want to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus XZ-10 features physical measurements of 102mm x 61mm x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs) and the Ricoh GR III has proportions of 109mm x 62mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") having a weight of 257 grams (0.57 lbs).
See the Olympus XZ-10 versus Ricoh GR III in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have during that time. The following is the front view dimension comparison of the XZ-10 against the GR III.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the XZ-10 and GR III is 91 and 90 respectively.
Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh GR III Sensor Comparison
Usually, its difficult to envision the contrast between sensor sizes purely by reading through technical specs. The image here might provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the XZ-10 and GR III.
As you can tell, both of these cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The XZ-10 using its tinier sensor will make getting shallow depth of field more challenging and the Ricoh GR III will resolve extra detail with its extra 12MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop pictures much more aggressively. The more aged XZ-10 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh GR III Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh GR III Specifications
| Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | Ricoh GR III | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | Ricoh GR III |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2013-01-30 | 2018-09-25 |
| Physical type | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 366.6mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 24 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1 and 3:2 |
| Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 6000 x 4000 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 102400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 35 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
| Highest aperture | f/1.8-2.7 | f/2.8-16 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 6cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 920 thousand dots | 1,037 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Optical (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 30s | 30s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 5.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, Flash On, Flash On+Red-eye, Slow-speed Sync, Slow Sync+Red-eye |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps, 18Mbps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps, 9Mbps) | 1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | Yes |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 221 grams (0.49 lbs) | 257 grams (0.57 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 102 x 61 x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 109 x 62 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 photographs | - |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | Li-50B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Internal, SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported) |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch price | $428 | $900 |