Clicky

Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh GR III

Portability
91
Imaging
36
Features
57
Overall
44
Olympus Stylus XZ-10 front
 
Ricoh GR III front
Portability
90
Imaging
68
Features
62
Overall
65

Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh GR III Key Specs

Olympus XZ-10
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 26-130mm (F1.8-2.7) lens
  • 221g - 102 x 61 x 34mm
  • Revealed January 2013
Ricoh GR III
(Full Review)
  • 24MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 102400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28mm (F2.8-16) lens
  • 257g - 109 x 62 x 33mm
  • Announced September 2018
  • Old Model is Ricoh GR III
  • Replacement is Ricoh GR III
Photography Glossary

Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh GR III Overview

Below, we will be looking at the Olympus XZ-10 versus Ricoh GR III, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Ricoh. There is a large difference between the sensor resolutions of the XZ-10 (12MP) and GR III (24MP) and the XZ-10 (1/2.3") and GR III (APS-C) come with totally different sensor measurements.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The XZ-10 was announced 6 years earlier than the GR III which is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Olympus XZ-10 being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GR III being a Large Sensor Compact camera.

Before we go straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a short introduction of how the XZ-10 matches up vs the GR III in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

        

Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-10 over the Ricoh GR III

 XZ-10 GR III 

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR III over the Olympus XZ-10

 GR III XZ-10 
AnnouncedSeptember 2018January 2013More modern by 68 months
Screen resolution1037k920kCrisper screen (+117k dot)

Common features in the Olympus XZ-10 and Ricoh GR III

 XZ-10 GR III 
Manually focus More exact focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen dimension3"3"Identical screen measurements
Selfie screen Neither includes selfie screen
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh GR III Physical Comparison

For those who are planning to carry around your camera often, you will want to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus XZ-10 features physical measurements of 102mm x 61mm x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs) and the Ricoh GR III has proportions of 109mm x 62mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") having a weight of 257 grams (0.57 lbs).

See the Olympus XZ-10 versus Ricoh GR III in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have during that time. The following is the front view dimension comparison of the XZ-10 against the GR III.

Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh GR III size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the XZ-10 and GR III is 91 and 90 respectively.

Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh GR III top view buttons comparison

Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh GR III Sensor Comparison

Usually, its difficult to envision the contrast between sensor sizes purely by reading through technical specs. The image here might provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the XZ-10 and GR III.

As you can tell, both of these cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The XZ-10 using its tinier sensor will make getting shallow depth of field more challenging and the Ricoh GR III will resolve extra detail with its extra 12MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop pictures much more aggressively. The more aged XZ-10 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.

Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh GR III sensor size comparison

Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh GR III Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh GR III Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus XZ-10 Portrait photography advice
Ricoh GR III Portrait photography advice
45
you can focus manually
includes face detect autofocus
supports RAW formats
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
80
has manual focus
megapixel count decent (24MP)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
provides face detection focus
saves RAW files
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Olympus XZ-10 Street photography advice
Ricoh GR III Street photography advice
61
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports RAW formats
screen is fixed
sensor is small (1/2.3")
more heavy than competition (221g)
84
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
saves RAW files
features touch to focus
lighter than competition (257g)
above average ISO range (102,400)
fixed screen
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus XZ-10
Sports photography with Ricoh GR III
34
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
includes tracking focus
painfully slow continuous shooting (5.0 frames per second)
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
no phase detect autofocus
75
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count decent (24 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
provides tracking autofocus
supports phase detect auto focus
fixed focal length (28mm)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Travel Comparison

Olympus XZ-10 Travel photography information
Ricoh GR III Travel photography information
60
flash built-in
rather wide (26mm)
great max aperture (f1.8)
doesn't have Timelapse function
more heavy than competition (221g)
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
69
lighter than competition (257g)
features touch to focus
megapixel count decent (24MP)
missing Timelapse mode
screen isn't selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Olympus XZ-10 as a Landscape photography camera
Ricoh GR III as a Landscape photography camera
53
you can focus manually
rather wide (26mm)
great max aperture (f1.8)
nice screen size (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports RAW formats
can't swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
low megapixels (12MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have Timelapse function
69
has manual focus
decent sized screen (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count decent (24 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
no anti-alias filter
above average ISO range (102,400)
saves RAW files
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
fixed focal length (28mm)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
missing Timelapse mode
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus XZ-10
Vlogging with Ricoh GR III
35
rather wide (26mm)
great max aperture (f1.8)
touchscreen functionality
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
includes face detect autofocus
high res video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
screen is not selfie friendly
doesn't have microphone support
more heavy than competition (221 grams)
37
touchscreen
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides face detection focus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than competition (257g)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
screen isn't selfie friendly
missing external microphone socket
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh GR III Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus XZ-10 and Ricoh GR III
 Olympus Stylus XZ-10Ricoh GR III
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Ricoh
Model Olympus Stylus XZ-10 Ricoh GR III
Category Small Sensor Compact Large Sensor Compact
Revealed 2013-01-30 2018-09-25
Physical type Compact Large Sensor Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.5 x 15.6mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 366.6mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixels 24 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1 and 3:2
Full resolution 3968 x 2976 6000 x 4000
Max native ISO 6400 102400
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW support
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch focus
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Number of focus points 35 -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 26-130mm (5.0x) 28mm (1x)
Highest aperture f/1.8-2.7 f/2.8-16
Macro focus range 1cm 6cm
Crop factor 5.8 1.5
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3" 3"
Screen resolution 920 thousand dots 1,037 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Optical (optional)
Features
Slowest shutter speed 30s 30s
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000s 1/4000s
Continuous shooting rate 5.0 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range - no built-in flash
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless Auto, Flash On, Flash On+Red-eye, Slow-speed Sync, Slow Sync+Red-eye
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps, 18Mbps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps, 9Mbps) 1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM
Max video resolution 1920x1080 1920x1080
Video data format MPEG-4, H.264 MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) Yes
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 221 grams (0.49 lbs) 257 grams (0.57 lbs)
Dimensions 102 x 61 x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") 109 x 62 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 240 photographs -
Battery type Battery Pack -
Battery model Li-50B -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes
Time lapse recording
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC Internal, SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported)
Card slots 1 1
Launch price $428 $900