Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
91 Imaging
36 Features
57 Overall
44


69 Imaging
56 Features
45 Overall
51
Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F1.8-2.7) lens
- 221g - 102 x 61 x 34mm
- Released January 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-85mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 550g - 114 x 75 x 93mm
- Introduced February 2012

Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Overview
On this page, we are looking at the Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by competitors Olympus and Ricoh. There is a significant difference between the resolutions of the XZ-10 (12MP) and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (16MP) and the XZ-10 (1/2.3") and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (APS-C) boast different sensor dimensions.

The XZ-10 was manufactured 13 months after the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 making them a generation away from each other. Both cameras have different body design with the Olympus XZ-10 being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving into a thorough comparison, here is a simple view of how the XZ-10 matches up against the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus XZ-10 and Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5. The entire galleries are available at Olympus XZ-10 Gallery and Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-10 over the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
XZ-10 | GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2013 | ![]() | February 2012 | More modern by 13 months |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 over the Olympus XZ-10
GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | XZ-10 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-10 and Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
XZ-10 | GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More precise focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal display sizing |
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 920k | Identical display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to carry around your camera, you're going to have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus XZ-10 features exterior measurements of 102mm x 61mm x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") and a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs) while the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 has dimensions of 114mm x 75mm x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7") with a weight of 550 grams (1.21 lbs).
Compare the Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have at the time. Following is a front view dimension comparison of the XZ-10 vs the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5.

Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the XZ-10 and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 is 91 and 69 respectively.

Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Sensor Comparison
Often, its difficult to visualize the contrast between sensor sizes simply by checking technical specs. The pic here may provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the XZ-10 and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5.
As you have seen, the 2 cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The XZ-10 because of its tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field trickier and the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 will give greater detail due to its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop pics more aggressively. The fresher XZ-10 provides an edge when it comes to sensor tech.

Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Specifications
Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model type | Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced Mirrorless |
Released | 2013-01-30 | 2012-02-02 |
Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 370.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4928 x 3264 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 35 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 24-85mm (3.5x) |
Largest aperture | f/1.8-2.7 | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 920k dots | 920k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 30 seconds | 180 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/3200 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 5.0fps | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps, 18Mbps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps, 9Mbps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 221 gr (0.49 lb) | 550 gr (1.21 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 102 x 61 x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 114 x 75 x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 photographs | 400 photographs |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | Li-50B | DB-90 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $428 | $871 |