Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh WG-30
91 Imaging
36 Features
57 Overall
44
91 Imaging
40 Features
34 Overall
37
Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh WG-30 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F1.8-2.7) lens
- 221g - 102 x 61 x 34mm
- Revealed January 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 192g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Released October 2014
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh WG-30 Overview
Following is a detailed overview of the Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh WG-30, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by brands Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a considerable gap between the image resolutions of the XZ-10 (12MP) and WG-30 (16MP) but they use the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe XZ-10 was announced 20 months earlier than the WG-30 making the cameras a generation away from one another. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving in to a full comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the XZ-10 grades versus the WG-30 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh WG-30 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus XZ-10 & Ricoh WG-30. The whole galleries are available at Olympus XZ-10 Gallery & Ricoh WG-30 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-10 over the Ricoh WG-30
| XZ-10 | WG-30 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More exact focus | ||
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+690k dot) |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-30 over the Olympus XZ-10
| WG-30 | XZ-10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | October 2014 |  | January 2013 | More modern by 20 months |
Common features in the Olympus XZ-10 and Ricoh WG-30
| XZ-10 | WG-30 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh WG-30 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to carry around your camera often, you'll have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus XZ-10 enjoys physical measurements of 102mm x 61mm x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") with a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-30 has dimensions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 192 grams (0.42 lbs).
Compare the Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh WG-30 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have attached during that time. The following is the front view measurements comparison of the XZ-10 against the WG-30.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the XZ-10 and WG-30 is 91 and 91 respectively.
Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh WG-30 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's hard to imagine the contrast between sensor sizes purely by checking specs. The picture below will give you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the XZ-10 and WG-30.
All in all, both of those cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but different resolution. You can expect to see the Ricoh WG-30 to give greater detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The more aged XZ-10 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh WG-30 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh WG-30 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | Ricoh WG-30 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model type | Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | Ricoh WG-30 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2013-01-30 | 2014-10-09 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 35 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/1.8-2.7 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of display | 920k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 30 secs | 4 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames per sec | 1.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 3.90 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps, 18Mbps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps, 9Mbps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 221g (0.49 pounds) | 192g (0.42 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 102 x 61 x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 shots | 300 shots |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | Li-50B | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Pricing at launch | $428 | $428 |