Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS
Portability
91 Imaging
36 Features
57 Overall
44
91 Imaging
36 Features
57 Overall
44
Portability
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Key Specs
Olympus XZ-10
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F1.8-2.7) lens
- 221g - 102 x 61 x 34mm
- Introduced January 2013
Ricoh WG-4 GPS
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Introduced February 2014
- Later Model is Ricoh WG-5 GPS
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Overview
Its time to look closer at the Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by manufacturers Olympus and Ricoh. There is a substantial difference between the image resolutions of the XZ-10 (12MP) and WG-4 GPS (16MP) but both cameras offer the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe XZ-10 was released 12 months prior to the WG-4 GPS which means that they are of a similar age. Both the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving into a detailed comparison, here is a concise view of how the XZ-10 grades vs the WG-4 GPS when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus XZ-10 & Ricoh WG-4 GPS. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus XZ-10 Gallery & Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-10 over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
| XZ-10 | WG-4 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 460k | Crisper display (+460k dot) |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Olympus XZ-10
| WG-4 GPS | XZ-10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2014 |  | January 2013 | Newer by 12 months |
Common features in the Olympus XZ-10 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS
| XZ-10 | WG-4 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial accurate focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display size |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to travel with your camera regularly, you should think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus XZ-10 offers exterior dimensions of 102mm x 61mm x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-4 GPS has proportions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") along with a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have at that moment. The following is a front view dimensions comparison of the XZ-10 against the WG-4 GPS.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the XZ-10 and WG-4 GPS is 91 and 90 respectively.
Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is hard to visualise the contrast between sensor dimensions merely by reviewing a spec sheet. The image underneath will help give you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the XZ-10 and WG-4 GPS.
Clearly, both of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions but not the same MP. You can expect to see the Ricoh WG-4 GPS to offer greater detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop pics a bit more aggressively. The more aged XZ-10 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Olympus XZ-10 as a Portrait photography camera
Ricoh WG-4 GPS as a Portrait photography camera
focusing manually
comes with face detection autofocus
delivers RAW formats
sensor resolution low (12MP)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
manual focus
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
supports face detection focusing
lack of manual exposure
external flash not possible
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Olympus XZ-10 Street photography highlights
Ricoh WG-4 GPS Street photography highlights
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW formats
screen is fixed
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
heavier than competition (221g)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proofing
screen does not articulate
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
more heavy than competition (235 grams)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Olympus XZ-10 as a Sports photography camera
Ricoh WG-4 GPS as a Sports photography camera
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with tracking autofocus
max fps low (5.0 frames/s)
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
supports tracking autofocus
environment proofing
slow fps (2.0 fps)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
low battery life (240 per charge)
lack of phase detect AF
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Travel photography with Olympus XZ-10
Travel photography with Ricoh WG-4 GPS
flash built-in
decently wide (26mm)
very good maximum aperture (f1.8)
missing Time Lapse mode
heavier than competition (221 grams)
sensor resolution low (12MP)
does not contain selfie friendly display
environment proofing
megapixel count decent (16MP)
built-in flash
pretty wide (25mm)
good maximum aperture (f2.0)
low battery life (240 shots)
more heavy than competition (235g)
does not have selfie friendly screen
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Landscape photography with Olympus XZ-10
Landscape photography with Ricoh WG-4 GPS
focusing manually
decently wide (26mm)
very good maximum aperture (f1.8)
screen size is good (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW formats
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
missing Time Lapse mode
manual focus
pretty wide (25mm)
good maximum aperture (f2.0)
screen size is decent (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
environment proofing
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
lack of manual exposure
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
low battery life (240 CIPA)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Olympus XZ-10 Vlogging features
Ricoh WG-4 GPS Vlogging features
decently wide (26mm)
very good maximum aperture (f1.8)
touch screen
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with face detection autofocus
good video quality (1920 x 1080 pxls)
does not contain selfie friendly display
missing external mic port
heavier than competition (221 grams)
pretty wide (25mm)
good maximum aperture (f2.0)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports face detection focusing
video res high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
does not have selfie friendly screen
does not have external microphone jack
more heavy than competition (235 grams)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Specifications
| Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model type | Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | Ricoh WG-4 GPS |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2013-01-30 | 2014-02-05 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | 35 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/1.8-2.7 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 920k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 30 secs | 4 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 5.0 frames per second | 2.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps, 18Mbps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps, 9Mbps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 221g (0.49 lbs) | 235g (0.52 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 102 x 61 x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 photographs | 240 photographs |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | Li-50B | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch pricing | $428 | $210 |