Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh WG-50
91 Imaging
35 Features
57 Overall
43
91 Imaging
41 Features
39 Overall
40
Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh WG-50 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F1.8-2.7) lens
- 221g - 102 x 61 x 34mm
- Launched January 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Released May 2017
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh WG-50 Overview
Let's look a little more closely at the Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh WG-50, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof by competitors Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a huge gap between the sensor resolutions of the XZ-10 (12MP) and WG-50 (16MP) but they enjoy the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe XZ-10 was launched 5 years before the WG-50 and that is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving in to a detailed comparison, below is a simple view of how the XZ-10 matches up against the WG-50 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh WG-50 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus XZ-10 and Ricoh WG-50. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus XZ-10 Gallery and Ricoh WG-50 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-10 over the Ricoh WG-50
| XZ-10 | WG-50 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 920k | 230k | Clearer display (+690k dot) | |
| Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-50 over the Olympus XZ-10
| WG-50 | XZ-10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | May 2017 | January 2013 | Fresher by 52 months |
Common features in the Olympus XZ-10 and Ricoh WG-50
| XZ-10 | WG-50 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | More exact focusing | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh WG-50 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to carry your camera often, you'll have to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus XZ-10 features outer measurements of 102mm x 61mm x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") and a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-50 has measurements of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Look at the Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh WG-50 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you choose at the time. The following is the front view over all size comparison of the XZ-10 against the WG-50.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the XZ-10 and WG-50 is 91 and 91 respectively.
Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh WG-50 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be difficult to imagine the difference between sensor sizing only by reading a spec sheet. The photograph here should provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the XZ-10 and WG-50.
As you can see, both of those cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but different resolution. You should expect to see the Ricoh WG-50 to deliver more detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop pics a little more aggressively. The older XZ-10 is going to be behind in sensor technology.
Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh WG-50 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh WG-50 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | Ricoh WG-50 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model type | Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | Ricoh WG-50 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2013-01-30 | 2017-05-24 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 35 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/1.8-2.7 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Display resolution | 920 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 30 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 5.0 frames/s | 8.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | On, off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps, 18Mbps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps, 9Mbps) | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Yes (Wireless) |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 221 gr (0.49 lbs) | 193 gr (0.43 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 102 x 61 x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 photographs | 300 photographs |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | Li-50B | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Pricing at launch | $428 | $280 |