Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh WG-6
91 Imaging
36 Features
57 Overall
44
89 Imaging
47 Features
46 Overall
46
Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh WG-6 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F1.8-2.7) lens
- 221g - 102 x 61 x 34mm
- Launched January 2013
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 246g - 118 x 66 x 33mm
- Introduced February 2018
- Previous Model is Ricoh WG-5 GPS
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh WG-6 Overview
Let's look closer at the Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh WG-6, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof by brands Olympus and Ricoh. There is a significant difference among the image resolutions of the XZ-10 (12MP) and WG-6 (20MP) but they come with the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe XZ-10 was manufactured 6 years earlier than the WG-6 which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving straight into a detailed comparison, below is a concise overview of how the XZ-10 grades against the WG-6 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh WG-6 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus XZ-10 and Ricoh WG-6. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus XZ-10 Gallery and Ricoh WG-6 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-10 over the Ricoh WG-6
| XZ-10 | WG-6 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-6 over the Olympus XZ-10
| WG-6 | XZ-10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2018 |  | January 2013 | Newer by 61 months |
| Display resolution | 1040k |  | 920k | Crisper display (+120k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus XZ-10 and Ricoh WG-6
| XZ-10 | WG-6 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial exact focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh WG-6 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to travel with your camera often, you'll need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus XZ-10 provides external dimensions of 102mm x 61mm x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") along with a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-6 has dimensions of 118mm x 66mm x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") with a weight of 246 grams (0.54 lbs).
See the Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh WG-6 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have chosen during that time. Here is the front view proportions comparison of the XZ-10 and the WG-6.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the XZ-10 and WG-6 is 91 and 89 respectively.
Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh WG-6 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very tough to picture the gap in sensor dimensions purely by viewing specs. The image here will give you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the XZ-10 and WG-6.
As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but different resolution. You should anticipate the Ricoh WG-6 to render extra detail due to its extra 8MP. Greater resolution will also let you crop pics a little more aggressively. The more aged XZ-10 will be behind in sensor technology.
Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh WG-6 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh WG-6 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | Ricoh WG-6 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model type | Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | Ricoh WG-6 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2013-01-30 | 2018-02-21 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Maximum resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 5184 x 3888 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 35 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/1.8-2.7 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 920k dots | 1,040k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 30 secs | 4 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 5.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 5.50 m (with Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Flash on, flash off |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps, 18Mbps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps, 9Mbps) | 3840x2160 |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Supports FlashAir SD cards |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | DB-110 lithium-ion battery & USB charger |
| GPS | None | Built-in |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 221g (0.49 pounds) | 246g (0.54 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 102 x 61 x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 118 x 66 x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 images | 340 images |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | Li-50B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $428 | $271 |