Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh WG-M1
91 Imaging
35 Features
57 Overall
43
91 Imaging
38 Features
22 Overall
31
Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F1.8-2.7) lens
- 221g - 102 x 61 x 34mm
- Introduced January 2013
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Launched September 2014
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Overview
Here, we are looking at the Olympus XZ-10 versus Ricoh WG-M1, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by companies Olympus and Ricoh. The image resolution of the XZ-10 (12MP) and the WG-M1 (14MP) is fairly close and both cameras posses the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe XZ-10 was brought out 19 months before the WG-M1 making them a generation apart from each other. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving right into a full comparison, here is a concise overview of how the XZ-10 matches up vs the WG-M1 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus XZ-10 & Ricoh WG-M1. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus XZ-10 Gallery & Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-10 over the Ricoh WG-M1
| XZ-10 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More exact focusing | ||
| Display size | 3" |  | 1.5" | Larger display (+1.5") |
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 115k | Clearer display (+805k dot) |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Olympus XZ-10
| WG-M1 | XZ-10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | September 2014 |  | January 2013 | More recent by 19 months |
Common features in the Olympus XZ-10 and Ricoh WG-M1
| XZ-10 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to lug around your camera often, you'll need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus XZ-10 has got outer dimensions of 102mm x 61mm x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-M1 has measurements of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") along with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Compare the Olympus XZ-10 versus Ricoh WG-M1 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you select during that time. The following is a front view size comparison of the XZ-10 and the WG-M1.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the XZ-10 and WG-M1 is 91 and 91 respectively.
Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Sensor Comparison
Often, its tough to visualize the contrast in sensor measurements only by looking through a spec sheet. The graphic below will offer you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the XZ-10 and WG-M1.
As you can see, both of those cameras feature the identical sensor size but different MP. You can anticipate the Ricoh WG-M1 to render greater detail having its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop pics way more aggressively. The older XZ-10 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | Ricoh WG-M1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model type | Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | Ricoh WG-M1 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2013-01-30 | 2014-09-12 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 800 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 35 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | (1×) |
| Highest aperture | f/1.8-2.7 | f/2.8 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 1.5 inches |
| Screen resolution | 920k dots | 115k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 30s | - |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | - |
| Continuous shooting rate | 5.0fps | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | no built-in flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps, 18Mbps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps, 9Mbps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 221g (0.49 pounds) | 190g (0.42 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 102 x 61 x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 shots | 350 shots |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | Li-50B | DB-65 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | - |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | microSD/microSDHC, internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at launch | $428 | $2,000 |