Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh WG-M1
91 Imaging
36 Features
57 Overall
44
91 Imaging
38 Features
22 Overall
31
Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F1.8-2.7) lens
- 221g - 102 x 61 x 34mm
- Introduced January 2013
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Launched September 2014
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Overview
Here, we are looking at the Olympus XZ-10 versus Ricoh WG-M1, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by companies Olympus and Ricoh. The image resolution of the XZ-10 (12MP) and the WG-M1 (14MP) is fairly close and both cameras posses the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe XZ-10 was brought out 19 months before the WG-M1 making them a generation apart from each other. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving right into a full comparison, here is a concise overview of how the XZ-10 matches up vs the WG-M1 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus XZ-10 & Ricoh WG-M1. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus XZ-10 Gallery & Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-10 over the Ricoh WG-M1
| XZ-10 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More exact focusing | ||
| Display size | 3" |  | 1.5" | Larger display (+1.5") |
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 115k | Clearer display (+805k dot) |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Olympus XZ-10
| WG-M1 | XZ-10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | September 2014 |  | January 2013 | More recent by 19 months |
Common features in the Olympus XZ-10 and Ricoh WG-M1
| XZ-10 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to lug around your camera often, you'll need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus XZ-10 has got outer dimensions of 102mm x 61mm x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-M1 has measurements of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") along with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Compare the Olympus XZ-10 versus Ricoh WG-M1 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you select during that time. The following is a front view size comparison of the XZ-10 and the WG-M1.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the XZ-10 and WG-M1 is 91 and 91 respectively.
Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Sensor Comparison
Often, its tough to visualize the contrast in sensor measurements only by looking through a spec sheet. The graphic below will offer you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the XZ-10 and WG-M1.
As you can see, both of those cameras feature the identical sensor size but different MP. You can anticipate the Ricoh WG-M1 to render greater detail having its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop pics way more aggressively. The older XZ-10 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Olympus XZ-10 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | Ricoh WG-M1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model type | Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | Ricoh WG-M1 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2013-01-30 | 2014-09-12 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 800 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 35 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | (1×) |
| Highest aperture | f/1.8-2.7 | f/2.8 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 1.5 inches |
| Screen resolution | 920k dots | 115k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 30s | - |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | - |
| Continuous shooting rate | 5.0fps | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | no built-in flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps, 18Mbps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps, 9Mbps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 221g (0.49 pounds) | 190g (0.42 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 102 x 61 x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 shots | 350 shots |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | Li-50B | DB-65 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | - |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | microSD/microSDHC, internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at launch | $428 | $2,000 |