Clicky

Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung DV150F

Portability
91
Imaging
36
Features
57
Overall
44
Olympus Stylus XZ-10 front
 
Samsung DV150F front
Portability
96
Imaging
40
Features
29
Overall
35

Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung DV150F Key Specs

Olympus XZ-10
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 26-130mm (F1.8-2.7) lens
  • 221g - 102 x 61 x 34mm
  • Announced January 2013
Samsung DV150F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 25-125mm (F2.5-6.3) lens
  • 116g - 96 x 55 x 18mm
  • Announced January 2013
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung DV150F Overview

In this article, we will be reviewing the Olympus XZ-10 versus Samsung DV150F, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by rivals Olympus and Samsung. There exists a crucial gap among the sensor resolutions of the XZ-10 (12MP) and DV150F (16MP) but they feature the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The XZ-10 was released within a month of the DV150F so they are both of a similar generation. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).

Before we go through a detailed comparison, below is a brief summary of how the XZ-10 scores vs the DV150F when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-10 over the Samsung DV150F

 XZ-10 DV150F 
Manually focus Very accurate focusing
Screen sizing3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution920k460kCrisper screen (+460k dot)

Reasons to pick Samsung DV150F over the Olympus XZ-10

 DV150F XZ-10 

Common features in the Olympus XZ-10 and Samsung DV150F

 XZ-10 DV150F 
AnnouncedJanuary 2013January 2013Same generation
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither provides selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung DV150F Physical Comparison

When you are intending to carry your camera frequently, you'll have to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus XZ-10 provides physical measurements of 102mm x 61mm x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs) and the Samsung DV150F has sizing of 96mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") with a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs).

Compare the Olympus XZ-10 versus Samsung DV150F in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you choose at the time. Here is the front view measurement comparison of the XZ-10 and the DV150F.

Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung DV150F size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the XZ-10 and DV150F is 91 and 96 respectively.

Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung DV150F top view buttons comparison

Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung DV150F Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it can be hard to see the gap in sensor sizing merely by viewing specs. The photograph below will provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the XZ-10 and DV150F.

As you can plainly see, the two cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same megapixels. You should expect the Samsung DV150F to render extra detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop pictures far more aggressively.

Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung DV150F sensor size comparison

Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung DV150F Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung DV150F Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus XZ-10 Portrait photography highlights
Samsung DV150F Portrait photography highlights
45
manual focus
has face detect focus
saves RAW formats
megapixel count low (12MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
35
resolution is good (16MP)
includes face detect focusing
lack of manual focus
lack of manual exposure
no external flash support
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Olympus XZ-10 Street photography highlights
Samsung DV150F Street photography highlights
61
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
saves RAW formats
screen does not articulate
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
heavier than average in class (221 grams)
56
lighter than competition in class (116 grams)
no articulating screen
no image stabilization
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus XZ-10
Sports photography with Samsung DV150F
34
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has tracking focus
continuous shooting slow (5.0 frames/s)
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect auto focus
36
resolution is good (16MP)
includes tracking focus
lack of shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect AF
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus XZ-10
Travel photography with Samsung DV150F
60
built-in flash
quite wide (26mm)
great maximum aperture (f1.8)
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
heavier than average in class (221g)
megapixel count low (12MP)
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
69
lighter than competition in class (116 grams)
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
quite wide (25mm)
lack of Time Lapse recording
display isn't selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f2.5)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus XZ-10
Landscape photography with Samsung DV150F
53
manual focus
quite wide (26mm)
great maximum aperture (f1.8)
nice screen size (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
saves RAW formats
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
34
quite wide (25mm)
resolution is good (16MP)
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f2.5)
screen is small (2.7")
lack of manual exposure
no image stabilization
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
lack of Time Lapse recording
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus XZ-10 as a Vlogging camera
Samsung DV150F as a Vlogging camera
35
quite wide (26mm)
great maximum aperture (f1.8)
touchscreen
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has face detect focus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
doesn't have mic support
heavier than average in class (221 grams)
32
quite wide (25mm)
touchscreen functionality
includes face detect focusing
lighter than competition in class (116 grams)
slow maximum aperture (f2.5)
display isn't selfie friendly
no image stabilization
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pxls)
lack of mic support
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung DV150F Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus XZ-10 and Samsung DV150F
 Olympus Stylus XZ-10Samsung DV150F
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Samsung
Model Olympus Stylus XZ-10 Samsung DV150F
Type Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Compact
Announced 2013-01-30 2013-01-07
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 16MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 -
Highest resolution 3968 x 2976 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 6400 3200
Min native ISO 100 80
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch to focus
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Number of focus points 35 -
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 26-130mm (5.0x) 25-125mm (5.0x)
Maximum aperture f/1.8-2.7 f/2.5-6.3
Macro focus distance 1cm -
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3 inch 2.7 inch
Display resolution 920k dots 460k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Display technology - Rear TFT LCD + 1.5 inch front LCd
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 30 secs 8 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shooting rate 5.0 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless -
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps, 18Mbps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps, 9Mbps) 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps)
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video data format MPEG-4, H.264 MPEG-4, H.264
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 221 grams (0.49 pounds) 116 grams (0.26 pounds)
Dimensions 102 x 61 x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") 96 x 55 x 18mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 240 pictures -
Style of battery Battery Pack -
Battery model Li-50B -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC microSD/microSDHC/microSDXC
Card slots Single Single
Price at launch $428 $150