Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G
91 Imaging
36 Features
57 Overall
44
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/82a12/82a1263e2fcea5ac4d6bef1198741cbea2097fd0" alt="Olympus Stylus XZ-10 front Olympus Stylus XZ-10 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/01699/01699e5c3590223af1fd702770b42712f097ec56" alt="Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G front Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G front"
90 Imaging
39 Features
44 Overall
41
Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F1.8-2.7) lens
- 221g - 102 x 61 x 34mm
- Launched January 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 4.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-481mm (F) lens
- 305g - 129 x 71 x 19mm
- Announced August 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Overview
In this write-up, we will be looking at the Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Olympus and Samsung. There exists a big gap between the image resolutions of the XZ-10 (12MP) and Galaxy Camera 4G (16MP) but they feature the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The XZ-10 was manufactured 6 months later than the Galaxy Camera 4G and they are both of a similar generation. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting in to a full comparison, below is a brief overview of how the XZ-10 matches up versus the Galaxy Camera 4G in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus XZ-10 and Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus XZ-10 Gallery and Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-10 over the Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G
XZ-10 | Galaxy Camera 4G | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very exact focusing | ||
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 0k | Crisper screen (+920k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G over the Olympus XZ-10
Galaxy Camera 4G | XZ-10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen sizing | 4.8" | ![]() | 3" | Bigger screen (+1.8") |
Common features in the Olympus XZ-10 and Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G
XZ-10 | Galaxy Camera 4G | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2013 | ![]() | August 2012 | Similar generation |
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Physical Comparison
When you are looking to carry your camera regularly, you should factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus XZ-10 comes with external measurements of 102mm x 61mm x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") having a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs) while the Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G has proportions of 129mm x 71mm x 19mm (5.1" x 2.8" x 0.7") with a weight of 305 grams (0.67 lbs).
Check the Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you choose at that time. Below is the front view measurement comparison of the XZ-10 and the Galaxy Camera 4G.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f498f/f498f503b3b8ca3cbecb8803356e9a3f32b2adfb" alt="Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G size comparison Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the XZ-10 and Galaxy Camera 4G is 91 and 90 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b1445/b144548e6e62f6bffca9aa160a3d0ceba1d04d68" alt="Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G top view buttons comparison Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G top view buttons comparison"
Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Sensor Comparison
Normally, its hard to visualise the gap between sensor sizing purely by reading through a spec sheet. The photograph underneath might offer you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the XZ-10 and Galaxy Camera 4G.
As you can see, both of these cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same megapixels. You should expect the Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G to give extra detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop photographs a little more aggressively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8b2ea/8b2ea5ae42bd938d2ad9404360217a193372c066" alt="Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G sensor size comparison Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G sensor size comparison"
Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3fb08/3fb086738c37d15f3e46f6ef57ae1fb6c5b57c0f" alt="Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Specifications
Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Samsung |
Model | Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2013-01-30 | 2012-08-29 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | 1.4GHz Quad-Core |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Maximum resolution | 3968 x 2976 | - |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 23-481mm (20.9x) |
Max aperture | f/1.8-2.7 | - |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inches | 4.8 inches |
Display resolution | 920 thousand dot | 0 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display technology | - | 308 ppi, HD Super Clear Touch Display |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 30 seconds | - |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | - | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps, 18Mbps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps, 9Mbps) | 1920 x 1080 |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 221 gr (0.49 lb) | 305 gr (0.67 lb) |
Dimensions | 102 x 61 x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 129 x 71 x 19mm (5.1" x 2.8" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 pictures | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | Li-50B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | - |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | micro SD/micro SDHC/micro SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail cost | $428 | $550 |