Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung HZ10W
91 Imaging
36 Features
57 Overall
44
90 Imaging
32 Features
27 Overall
30
Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung HZ10W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F1.8-2.7) lens
- 221g - 102 x 61 x 34mm
- Announced January 2013
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
- 249g - 105 x 61 x 37mm
- Introduced May 2009
- Also referred to as WB500
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung HZ10W Overview
Following is a detailed comparison of the Olympus XZ-10 and Samsung HZ10W, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by companies Olympus and Samsung. The image resolution of the XZ-10 (12MP) and the HZ10W (10MP) is fairly similar and both cameras posses the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe XZ-10 was announced 3 years after the HZ10W which is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving right into a full comparison, here is a concise summary of how the XZ-10 matches up versus the HZ10W for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung HZ10W Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus XZ-10 & Samsung HZ10W. The whole galleries are available at Olympus XZ-10 Gallery & Samsung HZ10W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-10 over the Samsung HZ10W
| XZ-10 | HZ10W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2013 | May 2009 | More modern by 46 months | |
| Display dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 920k | 230k | Sharper display (+690k dot) | |
| Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ10W over the Olympus XZ-10
| HZ10W | XZ-10 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-10 and Samsung HZ10W
| XZ-10 | HZ10W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Dial accurate focus | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung HZ10W Physical Comparison
If you are going to carry around your camera, you should consider its weight and size. The Olympus XZ-10 comes with external measurements of 102mm x 61mm x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") having a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs) and the Samsung HZ10W has specifications of 105mm x 61mm x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") and a weight of 249 grams (0.55 lbs).
Look at the Olympus XZ-10 and Samsung HZ10W in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are employing at that moment. The following is a front view measurement comparison of the XZ-10 against the HZ10W.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the XZ-10 and HZ10W is 91 and 90 respectively.
Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung HZ10W Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its hard to picture the gap between sensor sizes merely by reviewing specifications. The picture underneath will help provide you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the XZ-10 and HZ10W.
To sum up, both of those cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but different MP. You can anticipate the Olympus XZ-10 to offer extra detail with its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop images more aggressively. The more recent XZ-10 provides a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung HZ10W Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung HZ10W Specifications
| Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | Samsung HZ10W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model type | Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | Samsung HZ10W |
| Otherwise known as | - | WB500 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2013-01-30 | 2009-05-14 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3648 x 2432 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 35 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 24-240mm (10.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/1.8-2.7 | f/3.3-5.8 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of display | 920 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 30s | 16s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1500s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps, 18Mbps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps, 9Mbps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 221g (0.49 pounds) | 249g (0.55 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 102 x 61 x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 105 x 61 x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 photographs | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | Li-50B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail pricing | $428 | $300 |