Clicky

Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung MV800

Portability
91
Imaging
36
Features
57
Overall
44
Olympus Stylus XZ-10 front
 
Samsung MV800 front
Portability
97
Imaging
39
Features
43
Overall
40

Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung MV800 Key Specs

Olympus XZ-10
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 26-130mm (F1.8-2.7) lens
  • 221g - 102 x 61 x 34mm
  • Released January 2013
Samsung MV800
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 26-130mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
  • 121g - 92 x 56 x 10mm
  • Introduced September 2011
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung MV800 Overview

Its time to look a bit more closely at the Olympus XZ-10 versus Samsung MV800, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by companies Olympus and Samsung. There is a large difference between the image resolutions of the XZ-10 (12MP) and MV800 (16MP) but they feature the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The XZ-10 was brought out 18 months after the MV800 which makes the cameras a generation away from each other. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).

Before we go straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a simple view of how the XZ-10 matches up versus the MV800 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-10 over the Samsung MV800

 XZ-10 MV800 
IntroducedJanuary 2013September 2011Newer by 18 months
Focus manually Dial accurate focusing
Screen resolution920k460kSharper screen (+460k dot)

Reasons to pick Samsung MV800 over the Olympus XZ-10

 MV800 XZ-10 
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen

Common features in the Olympus XZ-10 and Samsung MV800

 XZ-10 MV800 
Screen sizing3"3"Equivalent screen measurements
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung MV800 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is looking to travel with your camera frequently, you'll need to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus XZ-10 has outside measurements of 102mm x 61mm x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs) and the Samsung MV800 has measurements of 92mm x 56mm x 10mm (3.6" x 2.2" x 0.4") along with a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs).

Take a look at the Olympus XZ-10 versus Samsung MV800 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are using at that time. Following is the front view overall size comparison of the XZ-10 vs the MV800.

Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung MV800 size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability grade of the XZ-10 and MV800 is 91 and 97 respectively.

Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung MV800 top view buttons comparison

Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung MV800 Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it can be tough to envision the gap between sensor dimensions simply by reviewing specs. The pic here will help offer you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the XZ-10 and MV800.

All in all, both of these cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same megapixels. You can expect the Samsung MV800 to offer you extra detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop pictures a little more aggressively. The more modern XZ-10 is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.

Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung MV800 sensor size comparison

Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung MV800 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung MV800 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus XZ-10 Portrait photography highlights
Samsung MV800 Portrait photography highlights
45
manual focus
includes face detection autofocus
delivers RAW files
low megapixels (12MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
34
decent MP (16MP)
has face detect focusing
lack of manual focus
no manual control
external flash not possible
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Olympus XZ-10 Street photography info
Samsung MV800 Street photography info
61
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW files
screen does not articulate
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
heavier than average in class (221 grams)
74
tilting screen
has image stabilization (Optical)
provides focus by touch
lighter than competitors (121 grams)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Olympus XZ-10 as a Sports photography camera
Samsung MV800 as a Sports photography camera
34
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
includes tracking autofocus
very slow continuous shooting (5.0 fps)
low megapixels (12MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
44
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (16MP)
has tracking focus
no shutter priority mode
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect AF
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Travel Comparison

Olympus XZ-10 Travel photography info
Samsung MV800 Travel photography info
60
flash built-in
fairly wide (26mm)
very good max aperture (f1.8)
lack of Time Lapse recording
heavier than average in class (221 grams)
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
does not contain selfie friendly display
71
lighter than competitors (121 grams)
provides focus by touch
decent MP (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
reasonably wide (26mm)
no Timelapse recording
screen isn't selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Olympus XZ-10 Landscape photography details
Samsung MV800 Landscape photography details
53
manual focus
fairly wide (26mm)
very good max aperture (f1.8)
screen size is good (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW files
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
low megapixels (12MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of Time Lapse recording
43
reasonably wide (26mm)
decent sized screen (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (16 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
cannot swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
no manual control
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
no Timelapse recording
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus XZ-10 Vlogging information
Samsung MV800 Vlogging information
35
fairly wide (26mm)
very good max aperture (f1.8)
screen is touchscreen
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
includes face detection autofocus
high res video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
does not contain selfie friendly display
lack of external mic port
heavier than average in class (221g)
34
reasonably wide (26mm)
touchscreen enabled
has image stabilization (Optical)
has face detect focusing
lighter than competitors (121g)
slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
screen isn't selfie friendly
low res video (1280 x 720 resolution)
no microphone socket
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung MV800 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus XZ-10 and Samsung MV800
 Olympus Stylus XZ-10Samsung MV800
General Information
Company Olympus Samsung
Model Olympus Stylus XZ-10 Samsung MV800
Class Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Compact
Released 2013-01-30 2011-09-01
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Full resolution 3968 x 2976 4608 x 3456
Max native ISO 6400 3200
Lowest native ISO 100 80
RAW format
Autofocusing
Manual focus
AF touch
AF continuous
Single AF
AF tracking
Selective AF
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Number of focus points 35 -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 26-130mm (5.0x) 26-130mm (5.0x)
Maximal aperture f/1.8-2.7 f/3.3-5.9
Macro focus distance 1cm -
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Tilting
Screen sizing 3" 3"
Resolution of screen 920 thousand dots 460 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 30s 8s
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000s 1/2000s
Continuous shooting rate 5.0fps -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range - 3.20 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless -
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps, 18Mbps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps, 9Mbps) 1280 x 720 (30/15 fps), 640 x 480 (30/15 fps), 320 x 240 (30/15 fps)
Max video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video file format MPEG-4, H.264 MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 221g (0.49 lb) 121g (0.27 lb)
Dimensions 102 x 61 x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") 92 x 56 x 10mm (3.6" x 2.2" x 0.4")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 240 shots -
Type of battery Battery Pack -
Battery model Li-50B BP70
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC Micro SD
Card slots One One
Launch cost $428 $499