Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung NX300M
91 Imaging
36 Features
57 Overall
44
86 Imaging
62 Features
73 Overall
66
Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung NX300M Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F1.8-2.7) lens
- 221g - 102 x 61 x 34mm
- Revealed January 2013
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1/6000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 331g - 122 x 64 x 41mm
- Announced January 2013
Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung NX300M Overview
Following is a comprehensive analysis of the Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung NX300M, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by manufacturers Olympus and Samsung. There exists a big gap among the resolutions of the XZ-10 (12MP) and NX300M (20MP) and the XZ-10 (1/2.3") and NX300M (APS-C) boast different sensor size.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe XZ-10 was announced at a similar time to the NX300M which means that they are of a similar generation. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus XZ-10 being a Compact camera and the Samsung NX300M being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before going straight to a complete comparison, here is a brief summary of how the XZ-10 matches up vs the NX300M with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung NX300M Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus XZ-10 and Samsung NX300M. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus XZ-10 Gallery and Samsung NX300M Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-10 over the Samsung NX300M
XZ-10 | NX300M | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 920k | 768k | Sharper screen (+152k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung NX300M over the Olympus XZ-10
NX300M | XZ-10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen dimensions | 3.3" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Common features in the Olympus XZ-10 and Samsung NX300M
XZ-10 | NX300M | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2013 | January 2013 | Same generation | |
Focus manually | Dial accurate focus | |||
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung NX300M Physical Comparison
If you're intending to carry around your camera regularly, you will have to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus XZ-10 features outside dimensions of 102mm x 61mm x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs) and the Samsung NX300M has specifications of 122mm x 64mm x 41mm (4.8" x 2.5" x 1.6") accompanied by a weight of 331 grams (0.73 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung NX300M in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you choose during that time. The following is a front view measurements comparison of the XZ-10 vs the NX300M.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the XZ-10 and NX300M is 91 and 86 respectively.
Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung NX300M Sensor Comparison
Normally, its difficult to visualize the gap in sensor sizes just by seeing a spec sheet. The picture underneath might provide you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the XZ-10 and NX300M.
Clearly, both the cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The XZ-10 having a smaller sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF trickier and the Samsung NX300M will provide extra detail with its extra 8MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop shots a bit more aggressively.
Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung NX300M Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung NX300M Specifications
Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | Samsung NX300M | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Samsung |
Model | Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | Samsung NX300M |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2013-01-30 | 2013-01-03 |
Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | DRIMe IV |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 5472 x 3648 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | 247 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Samsung NX |
Lens focal range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | - |
Highest aperture | f/1.8-2.7 | - |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 32 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3.3 inch |
Screen resolution | 920 thousand dots | 768 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen tech | - | Active Matrix OLED screen |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 30 seconds | 30 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/6000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 5.0fps | 9.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | - | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps, 18Mbps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps, 9Mbps) | 1920 x 1080, 1280 x 720, 640 x 480, 320 x 240 |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 221 grams (0.49 pounds) | 331 grams (0.73 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 102 x 61 x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 122 x 64 x 41mm (4.8" x 2.5" x 1.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 images | 330 images |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | Li-50B | BP1130 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 sec to 30 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $428 | $699 |