Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung SL202
91 Imaging
36 Features
57 Overall
44
94 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung SL202 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F1.8-2.7) lens
- 221g - 102 x 61 x 34mm
- Launched January 2013
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Launched February 2009
- Also Known as PL50
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung SL202 Overview
Its time to look more closely at the Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung SL202, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by companies Olympus and Samsung. The image resolution of the XZ-10 (12MP) and the SL202 (10MP) is very well matched and both cameras boast the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe XZ-10 was released 4 years later than the SL202 and that is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before diving into a in-depth comparison, here is a concise summary of how the XZ-10 grades against the SL202 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung SL202 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus XZ-10 and Samsung SL202. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus XZ-10 Gallery and Samsung SL202 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-10 over the Samsung SL202
| XZ-10 | SL202 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2013 |  | February 2009 | Fresher by 49 months |
| Focus manually |  | More exact focusing | ||
| Display size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+690k dot) |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL202 over the Olympus XZ-10
| SL202 | XZ-10 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-10 and Samsung SL202
| XZ-10 | SL202 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung SL202 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to carry your camera frequently, you have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus XZ-10 has outer measurements of 102mm x 61mm x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") with a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs) while the Samsung SL202 has dimensions of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
Compare the Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung SL202 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are using at that time. Here is a front view over all size comparison of the XZ-10 vs the SL202.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the XZ-10 and SL202 is 91 and 94 respectively.
Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung SL202 Sensor Comparison
Generally, its hard to imagine the contrast between sensor sizing merely by reading through specifications. The visual underneath will help provide you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the XZ-10 and SL202.
Plainly, the two cameras come with the identical sensor size but different MP. You should expect to see the Olympus XZ-10 to resolve more detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The more modern XZ-10 provides an advantage with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung SL202 Screen and ViewFinder
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung SL202 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | Samsung SL202 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model | Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | Samsung SL202 |
| Alternative name | - | PL50 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2013-01-30 | 2009-02-17 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 35 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Largest aperture | f/1.8-2.7 | f/2.8-5.7 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" |
| Screen resolution | 920k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 30 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 5.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 4.60 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps, 18Mbps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps, 9Mbps) | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 221 gr (0.49 lb) | 168 gr (0.37 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 102 x 61 x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 photos | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | Li-50B | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch price | $428 | $140 |
