Clicky

Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung ST65

Portability
91
Imaging
35
Features
57
Overall
43
Olympus Stylus XZ-10 front
 
Samsung ST65 front
Portability
99
Imaging
36
Features
19
Overall
29

Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung ST65 Key Specs

Olympus XZ-10
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 26-130mm (F1.8-2.7) lens
  • 221g - 102 x 61 x 34mm
  • Introduced January 2013
Samsung ST65
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 0 - 0
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • ()mm (F) lens
  • n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
  • Introduced January 2011
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung ST65 Overview

Let's take a more detailed look at the Olympus XZ-10 versus Samsung ST65, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Ultracompact by competitors Olympus and Samsung. The resolution of the XZ-10 (12MP) and the ST65 (14MP) is relatively well matched and both cameras have the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The XZ-10 was introduced 2 years later than the ST65 and that is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Olympus XZ-10 being a Compact camera and the Samsung ST65 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before delving right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise overview of how the XZ-10 scores against the ST65 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

        

Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-10 over the Samsung ST65

 XZ-10 ST65 
IntroducedJanuary 2013January 2011Fresher by 25 months
Manual focus More exact focus
Screen resolution920k460kClearer screen (+460k dot)
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Reasons to pick Samsung ST65 over the Olympus XZ-10

 ST65 XZ-10 

Common features in the Olympus XZ-10 and Samsung ST65

 XZ-10 ST65 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen dimensions3"3"Equal screen measurement
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen

Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung ST65 Physical Comparison

If you are planning to carry your camera frequently, you'll have to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus XZ-10 has got outside dimensions of 102mm x 61mm x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") with a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs) whilst the Samsung ST65 has measurements of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") having a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).

Analyze the Olympus XZ-10 versus Samsung ST65 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are employing at the time. Below is a front view dimensions comparison of the XZ-10 compared to the ST65.

Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung ST65 size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the XZ-10 and ST65 is 91 and 99 respectively.

Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung ST65 top view buttons comparison

Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung ST65 Sensor Comparison

Normally, it is difficult to visualise the contrast between sensor sizing merely by checking a spec sheet. The photograph below will give you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the XZ-10 and ST65.

As you can see, the 2 cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same resolution. You can count on the Samsung ST65 to resolve greater detail using its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will let you crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The more recent XZ-10 will have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.

Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung ST65 sensor size comparison

Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung ST65 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung ST65 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus XZ-10 Portrait photography highlights
Samsung ST65 Portrait photography highlights
45
focusing manually
features face detection autofocus
exports RAW files
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
28
resolution is good (14 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
manual exposure not possible
can't use external flash
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Olympus XZ-10 Street photography factors
Samsung ST65 Street photography factors
60
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
exports RAW files
no moving screen
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
heavier than average (221 grams)
49
screen does not articulate
lack of image stabilization
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
low max ISO (0)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus XZ-10
Sports photography with Samsung ST65
34
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
features tracking autofocus
very slow continuous shooting (5.0 fps)
low megapixels (12MP)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
26
resolution is good (14MP)
fixed focal length (()mm)
no shutter priority
lack of image stabilization
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
has no phase detect auto focus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Olympus XZ-10 Travel photography information
Samsung ST65 Travel photography information
60
flash built-in
reasonably wide (26mm)
good max aperture (f1.8)
lack of Time Lapse function
heavier than average (221g)
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
70
resolution is good (14 megapixels)
flash built-in
great maximum aperture (f)
does not have Timelapse function
display isn't selfie friendly
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Olympus XZ-10 Landscape photography info
Samsung ST65 Landscape photography info
53
focusing manually
reasonably wide (26mm)
good max aperture (f1.8)
screen is a decent size (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
exports RAW files
cannot change lenses (fixed lens mount)
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of Time Lapse function
36
great maximum aperture (f)
screen is a good size (3")
resolution is good (14MP)
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
fixed focal length (()mm)
manual exposure not possible
lack of image stabilization
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
low max ISO (0)
has no RAW format
does not have Timelapse function
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus XZ-10
Vlogging with Samsung ST65
35
reasonably wide (26mm)
good max aperture (f1.8)
screen is touchscreen
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
features face detection autofocus
video res high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
screen isn't selfie friendly
lack of external mic jack
heavier than average (221g)
27
great maximum aperture (f)
display isn't selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
video res low (1280 x 720 pxls)
does not have external microphone support
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung ST65 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus XZ-10 and Samsung ST65
 Olympus Stylus XZ-10Samsung ST65
General Information
Brand Olympus Samsung
Model Olympus Stylus XZ-10 Samsung ST65
Type Small Sensor Compact Ultracompact
Introduced 2013-01-30 2011-01-19
Physical type Compact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.16 x 4.62mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.5mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 14 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 -
Highest resolution 3968 x 2976 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 6400 -
Minimum native ISO 100 -
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Number of focus points 35 -
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 26-130mm (5.0x) ()
Maximal aperture f/1.8-2.7 -
Macro focus distance 1cm -
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 3" 3"
Resolution of display 920 thousand dots 460 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 30 seconds 8 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shooting rate 5.0fps -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless -
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps, 18Mbps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps, 9Mbps) 1280 x 720
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video data format MPEG-4, H.264 -
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) none
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 221 gr (0.49 pounds) -
Physical dimensions 102 x 61 x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 240 images -
Style of battery Battery Pack -
Battery model Li-50B -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) -
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC -
Card slots One One
Retail cost $428 $130