Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung ST65
91 Imaging
35 Features
57 Overall
43
99 Imaging
36 Features
19 Overall
29
Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung ST65 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F1.8-2.7) lens
- 221g - 102 x 61 x 34mm
- Introduced January 2013
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
- Introduced January 2011
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung ST65 Overview
Let's take a more detailed look at the Olympus XZ-10 versus Samsung ST65, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Ultracompact by competitors Olympus and Samsung. The resolution of the XZ-10 (12MP) and the ST65 (14MP) is relatively well matched and both cameras have the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe XZ-10 was introduced 2 years later than the ST65 and that is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Olympus XZ-10 being a Compact camera and the Samsung ST65 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise overview of how the XZ-10 scores against the ST65 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung ST65 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus XZ-10 & Samsung ST65. The whole galleries are available at Olympus XZ-10 Gallery & Samsung ST65 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-10 over the Samsung ST65
| XZ-10 | ST65 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2013 | January 2011 | Fresher by 25 months | |
| Manual focus | More exact focus | |||
| Screen resolution | 920k | 460k | Clearer screen (+460k dot) | |
| Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST65 over the Olympus XZ-10
| ST65 | XZ-10 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-10 and Samsung ST65
| XZ-10 | ST65 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen measurement | |
| Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung ST65 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to carry your camera frequently, you'll have to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus XZ-10 has got outside dimensions of 102mm x 61mm x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") with a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs) whilst the Samsung ST65 has measurements of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") having a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus XZ-10 versus Samsung ST65 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are employing at the time. Below is a front view dimensions comparison of the XZ-10 compared to the ST65.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the XZ-10 and ST65 is 91 and 99 respectively.
Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung ST65 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is difficult to visualise the contrast between sensor sizing merely by checking a spec sheet. The photograph below will give you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the XZ-10 and ST65.
As you can see, the 2 cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same resolution. You can count on the Samsung ST65 to resolve greater detail using its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will let you crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The more recent XZ-10 will have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung ST65 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung ST65 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | Samsung ST65 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model | Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | Samsung ST65 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
| Introduced | 2013-01-30 | 2011-01-19 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | - |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 35 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | () |
| Maximal aperture | f/1.8-2.7 | - |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 920 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 30 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 5.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps, 18Mbps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps, 9Mbps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 221 gr (0.49 pounds) | - |
| Physical dimensions | 102 x 61 x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 images | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | Li-50B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | - |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Retail cost | $428 | $130 |