Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung TL100
91 Imaging
36 Features
57 Overall
44
91 Imaging
34 Features
20 Overall
28
Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung TL100 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F1.8-2.7) lens
- 221g - 102 x 61 x 34mm
- Revealed January 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F3.0-5.6) lens
- 219g - 105 x 61 x 37mm
- Revealed January 2009
- Alternate Name is ST50
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung TL100 Overview
In this article, we are reviewing the Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung TL100, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by manufacturers Olympus and Samsung. The resolution of the XZ-10 (12MP) and the TL100 (12MP) is fairly close and they come with the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe XZ-10 was launched 4 years after the TL100 which is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving in to a in depth comparison, below is a simple overview of how the XZ-10 matches up against the TL100 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung TL100 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus XZ-10 and Samsung TL100. The complete galleries are available at Olympus XZ-10 Gallery and Samsung TL100 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-10 over the Samsung TL100
| XZ-10 | TL100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2013 | January 2009 | Newer by 50 months | |
| Manually focus | Very exact focusing | |||
| Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 920k | 230k | Clearer display (+690k dot) | |
| Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL100 over the Olympus XZ-10
| TL100 | XZ-10 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-10 and Samsung TL100
| XZ-10 | TL100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung TL100 Physical Comparison
If you're going to travel with your camera frequently, you should factor in its weight and size. The Olympus XZ-10 features physical dimensions of 102mm x 61mm x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs) while the Samsung TL100 has specifications of 105mm x 61mm x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 219 grams (0.48 lbs).
Look at the Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung TL100 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you select during that time. Here is the front view physical size comparison of the XZ-10 and the TL100.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the XZ-10 and TL100 is 91 and 91 respectively.
Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung TL100 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be hard to picture the difference in sensor dimensions merely by viewing specifications. The picture here should offer you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the XZ-10 and TL100.
Plainly, both of those cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing and the exact same resolution therefore you should expect comparable quality of photographs though you will need to consider the release date of the cameras into account. The fresher XZ-10 should have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung TL100 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung TL100 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | Samsung TL100 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model type | Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | Samsung TL100 |
| Otherwise known as | - | ST50 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2013-01-30 | 2009-01-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Peak resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 35 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/1.8-2.7 | f/3.0-5.6 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 10cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Display resolution | 920 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 30s | 1s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1500s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 5.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps, 18Mbps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps, 9Mbps) | 800 x 592 (20 fps) , 640 x 480 (30,15 fps) , 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 221 gr (0.49 pounds) | 219 gr (0.48 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 102 x 61 x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 105 x 61 x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 photos | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | Li-50B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/MMC/SDHC card |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at release | $428 | $22 |