Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung WB50F
91 Imaging
36 Features
57 Overall
44
92 Imaging
40 Features
36 Overall
38
Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung WB50F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F1.8-2.7) lens
- 221g - 102 x 61 x 34mm
- Announced January 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 207g - 101 x 68 x 27mm
- Released January 2014
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung WB50F Overview
Lets look closer at the Olympus XZ-10 and Samsung WB50F, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Olympus and Samsung. There exists a huge gap among the sensor resolutions of the XZ-10 (12MP) and WB50F (16MP) but they possess the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe XZ-10 was unveiled 11 months before the WB50F and they are both of a similar generation. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting straight into a detailed comparison, below is a quick view of how the XZ-10 scores versus the WB50F with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photography Glossary Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung WB50F Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus XZ-10 and Samsung WB50F. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus XZ-10 Gallery and Samsung WB50F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-10 over the Samsung WB50F
| XZ-10 | WB50F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 920k | 460k | Sharper display (+460k dot) | |
| Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB50F over the Olympus XZ-10
| WB50F | XZ-10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2014 | January 2013 | Fresher by 11 months |
Common features in the Olympus XZ-10 and Samsung WB50F
| XZ-10 | WB50F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | More exact focus | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display size | |
| Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung WB50F Physical Comparison
If you're going to carry your camera often, you need to factor its weight and size. The Olympus XZ-10 features physical measurements of 102mm x 61mm x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") and a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB50F has specifications of 101mm x 68mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") along with a weight of 207 grams (0.46 lbs).
Check out the Olympus XZ-10 and Samsung WB50F in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you select at the time. The following is the front view dimension comparison of the XZ-10 vs the WB50F.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the XZ-10 and WB50F is 91 and 92 respectively.
Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung WB50F Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very tough to picture the difference in sensor sizing only by viewing technical specs. The visual underneath will help provide you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the XZ-10 and WB50F.
As you have seen, each of the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but different megapixels. You should expect to see the Samsung WB50F to result in extra detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop photos much more aggressively. The older XZ-10 will be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung WB50F Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung WB50F Specifications
| Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | Samsung WB50F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model | Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | Samsung WB50F |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2013-01-30 | 2014-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 35 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/1.8-2.7 | f/3.1-6.3 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Display resolution | 920k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 30s | - |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | - |
| Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps, 18Mbps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps, 9Mbps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 221 gr (0.49 pounds) | 207 gr (0.46 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 102 x 61 x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 101 x 68 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 photos | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | Li-50B | BP70A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail cost | $428 | $180 |