Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung WB700
91 Imaging
36 Features
57 Overall
44
98 Imaging
36 Features
21 Overall
30
Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung WB700 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F1.8-2.7) lens
- 221g - 102 x 61 x 34mm
- Released January 2013
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 100 x 59 x 22mm
- Released December 2010
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung WB700 Overview
On this page, we are comparing the Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung WB700, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by competitors Olympus and Samsung. The resolution of the XZ-10 (12MP) and the WB700 (14MP) is fairly comparable and both cameras boast the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe XZ-10 was manufactured 2 years later than the WB700 and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go right into a full comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the XZ-10 matches up against the WB700 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photography Glossary Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung WB700 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus XZ-10 & Samsung WB700. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus XZ-10 Gallery & Samsung WB700 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-10 over the Samsung WB700
| XZ-10 | WB700 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2013 | December 2010 | More recent by 26 months | |
| Focus manually | Dial exact focusing | |||
| Display resolution | 920k | 614k | Clearer display (+306k dot) | |
| Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB700 over the Olympus XZ-10
| WB700 | XZ-10 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-10 and Samsung WB700
| XZ-10 | WB700 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display measurement | |
| Selfie screen | No selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung WB700 Physical Comparison
When you are going to lug around your camera frequently, you will need to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus XZ-10 has outside measurements of 102mm x 61mm x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") with a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs) while the Samsung WB700 has sizing of 100mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") having a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Examine the Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung WB700 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have at that moment. Below is a front view size comparison of the XZ-10 versus the WB700.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the XZ-10 and WB700 is 91 and 98 respectively.
Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung WB700 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's difficult to visualize the difference in sensor measurements simply by checking out technical specs. The visual below will help offer you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the XZ-10 and WB700.
As you have seen, both of those cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different megapixels. You can anticipate the Samsung WB700 to produce greater detail due to its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop pics a bit more aggressively. The more modern XZ-10 should have a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung WB700 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus XZ-10 vs Samsung WB700 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | Samsung WB700 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model | Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | Samsung WB700 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2013-01-30 | 2010-12-28 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | - |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 35 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | () |
| Maximum aperture | f/1.8-2.7 | - |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 920k dots | 614k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 30s | 30s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 5.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps, 18Mbps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps, 9Mbps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 221 gr (0.49 lb) | - |
| Physical dimensions | 102 x 61 x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 100 x 59 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 shots | - |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | Li-50B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at release | $428 | $300 |