Olympus XZ-10 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill
91 Imaging
36 Features
57 Overall
44


83 Imaging
55 Features
33 Overall
46
Olympus XZ-10 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F1.8-2.7) lens
- 221g - 102 x 61 x 34mm
- Revealed January 2013
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 640 x 480 video
- 50mm (F2.8) lens
- 330g - 122 x 67 x 59mm
- Revealed February 2012
- Earlier Model is Sigma DP1 Merrill
- New Model is Sigma DP3 Merrill

Olympus XZ-10 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Overview
Its time to look much closer at the Olympus XZ-10 versus Sigma DP2 Merrill, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Large Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Sigma. The resolution of the XZ-10 (12MP) and the DP2 Merrill (15MP) is very comparable but the XZ-10 (1/2.3") and DP2 Merrill (APS-C) come with totally different sensor dimensions.

The XZ-10 was brought out 12 months later than the DP2 Merrill which means that they are both of a similar age. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus XZ-10 being a Compact camera and the Sigma DP2 Merrill being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before getting in to a detailed comparison, below is a concise summary of how the XZ-10 grades versus the DP2 Merrill with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Olympus XZ-10 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus XZ-10 & Sigma DP2 Merrill. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus XZ-10 Gallery & Sigma DP2 Merrill Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-10 over the Sigma DP2 Merrill
XZ-10 | DP2 Merrill | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2013 | ![]() | February 2012 | More recent by 12 months |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Merrill over the Olympus XZ-10
DP2 Merrill | XZ-10 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-10 and Sigma DP2 Merrill
XZ-10 | DP2 Merrill | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More accurate focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent display sizing |
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 920k | Exact same display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-10 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to lug around your camera often, you'll need to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus XZ-10 comes with outer dimensions of 102mm x 61mm x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") with a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs) and the Sigma DP2 Merrill has measurements of 122mm x 67mm x 59mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.3") and a weight of 330 grams (0.73 lbs).
Look at the Olympus XZ-10 versus Sigma DP2 Merrill in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have attached during that time. The following is the front view dimensions comparison of the XZ-10 and the DP2 Merrill.

Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the XZ-10 and DP2 Merrill is 91 and 83 respectively.

Olympus XZ-10 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's tough to see the gap in sensor measurements just by going through specs. The photograph here will help offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the XZ-10 and DP2 Merrill.
As you can plainly see, both of the cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The XZ-10 because of its smaller sensor will make getting bokeh tougher and the Sigma DP2 Merrill will provide more detail having its extra 3MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop images far more aggressively. The fresher XZ-10 is going to have an edge with regard to sensor innovation.

Olympus XZ-10 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus XZ-10 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Specifications
Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | Sigma DP2 Merrill | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Sigma |
Model type | Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | Sigma DP2 Merrill |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2013-01-30 | 2012-02-08 |
Body design | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Dual TRUE II engine |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 24 x 16mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 384.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 15 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Maximum resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4704 x 3136 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 35 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 50mm (1x) |
Highest aperture | f/1.8-2.7 | f/2.8 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 920 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 30 seconds | - |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames per second | 4.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | - | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps, 18Mbps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps, 9Mbps) | 640x480 |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 221g (0.49 lb) | 330g (0.73 lb) |
Dimensions | 102 x 61 x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 122 x 67 x 59mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 photos | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | Li-50B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | - |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch pricing | $428 | $931 |