Olympus XZ-10 vs Sigma DP2x
91 Imaging
36 Features
57 Overall
44
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/82a12/82a1263e2fcea5ac4d6bef1198741cbea2097fd0" alt="Olympus Stylus XZ-10 front Olympus Stylus XZ-10 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/31307/31307f578b4c97bbaccb2a84c69e5c0772bdeaaa" alt="Sigma DP2x front Sigma DP2x front"
86 Imaging
44 Features
31 Overall
38
Olympus XZ-10 vs Sigma DP2x Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F1.8-2.7) lens
- 221g - 102 x 61 x 34mm
- Revealed January 2013
(Full Review)
- 5MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 320 x 240 video
- 41mm (F) lens
- 280g - 113 x 60 x 56mm
- Launched February 2011
- Old Model is Sigma DP2s
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus XZ-10 vs Sigma DP2x Overview
Following is a complete analysis of the Olympus XZ-10 and Sigma DP2x, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Sigma. There is a large difference among the image resolutions of the XZ-10 (12MP) and DP2x (5MP) and the XZ-10 (1/2.3") and DP2x (APS-C) enjoy different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The XZ-10 was launched 2 years after the DP2x which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus XZ-10 being a Compact camera and the Sigma DP2x being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before delving through a in depth comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the XZ-10 grades versus the DP2x in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus XZ-10 vs Sigma DP2x Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus XZ-10 & Sigma DP2x. The complete galleries are available at Olympus XZ-10 Gallery & Sigma DP2x Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-10 over the Sigma DP2x
XZ-10 | DP2x | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2013 | ![]() | February 2011 | More modern by 25 months |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+690k dot) |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sigma DP2x over the Olympus XZ-10
DP2x | XZ-10 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-10 and Sigma DP2x
XZ-10 | DP2x | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More exact focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-10 vs Sigma DP2x Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you will need to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus XZ-10 has got physical dimensions of 102mm x 61mm x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") having a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs) while the Sigma DP2x has specifications of 113mm x 60mm x 56mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 2.2") accompanied by a weight of 280 grams (0.62 lbs).
Look at the Olympus XZ-10 and Sigma DP2x in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you select during that time. The following is the front view sizing comparison of the XZ-10 and the DP2x.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/062f5/062f5a38da63dd1cc61b41045da5d295ba4e1b4c" alt="Olympus XZ-10 vs Sigma DP2x size comparison Olympus XZ-10 vs Sigma DP2x size comparison"
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the XZ-10 and DP2x is 91 and 86 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/55453/55453d074c514f800e826d71dd330bff16b989b9" alt="Olympus XZ-10 vs Sigma DP2x top view buttons comparison Olympus XZ-10 vs Sigma DP2x top view buttons comparison"
Olympus XZ-10 vs Sigma DP2x Sensor Comparison
Usually, its difficult to visualize the difference in sensor sizes only by looking through a spec sheet. The picture below will help offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the XZ-10 and DP2x.
Clearly, both cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The XZ-10 due to its smaller sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF more challenging and the Olympus XZ-10 will result in extra detail utilizing its extra 7 Megapixels. Higher resolution will help you crop photographs far more aggressively. The more modern XZ-10 should have an edge with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/63ded/63ded15bdb4c89228dd6660be09c76ba6d03688f" alt="Olympus XZ-10 vs Sigma DP2x sensor size comparison Olympus XZ-10 vs Sigma DP2x sensor size comparison"
Olympus XZ-10 vs Sigma DP2x Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/96165/96165d59b334bdc5988c5afc44cca63fbfff337e" alt="Olympus XZ-10 vs Sigma DP2x Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus XZ-10 vs Sigma DP2x Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus XZ-10 vs Sigma DP2x Specifications
Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | Sigma DP2x | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Sigma |
Model | Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | Sigma DP2x |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2013-01-30 | 2011-02-08 |
Body design | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | True II |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 20.7 x 13.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 285.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 5 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 2640 x 1760 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 41mm (1x) |
Maximum aperture | f/1.8-2.7 | - |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.7 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 2.5 inch |
Resolution of screen | 920 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 30s | 15s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames per second | 3.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | - | 4.30 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Forced Flash, Red-Eye Reduction, Slow Synchro |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps, 18Mbps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps, 9Mbps) | 320 x 240 |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 320x240 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 221 grams (0.49 pounds) | 280 grams (0.62 pounds) |
Dimensions | 102 x 61 x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 113 x 60 x 56mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 2.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 shots | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | Li-50B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/MMC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Pricing at launch | $428 | $699 |