Olympus XZ-10 vs Sigma SD10
91 Imaging
35 Features
57 Overall
43
54 Imaging
38 Features
27 Overall
33
Olympus XZ-10 vs Sigma SD10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F1.8-2.7) lens
- 221g - 102 x 61 x 34mm
- Announced January 2013
(Full Review)
- 3MP - APS-C Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 800 (Boost to 1600)
- 1/6000s Maximum Shutter
- No Video
- Sigma SA Mount
- 950g - 152 x 120 x 79mm
- Released March 2004
- Superseded the Sigma SD9
- Updated by Sigma SD14
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus XZ-10 vs Sigma SD10 Overview
Below, we are comparing the Olympus XZ-10 vs Sigma SD10, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Advanced DSLR by rivals Olympus and Sigma. There exists a large gap between the image resolutions of the XZ-10 (12MP) and SD10 (3MP) and the XZ-10 (1/2.3") and SD10 (APS-C) enjoy different sensor dimensions.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe XZ-10 was brought out 8 years later than the SD10 and that is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Olympus XZ-10 being a Compact camera and the Sigma SD10 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before diving in to a in-depth comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the XZ-10 scores against the SD10 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus XZ-10 vs Sigma SD10 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus XZ-10 & Sigma SD10. The entire galleries are available at Olympus XZ-10 Gallery & Sigma SD10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-10 over the Sigma SD10
| XZ-10 | SD10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2013 | March 2004 | Fresher by 108 months | |
| Display dimension | 3" | 1.8" | Larger display (+1.2") | |
| Display resolution | 920k | 130k | Sharper display (+790k dot) | |
| Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sigma SD10 over the Olympus XZ-10
| SD10 | XZ-10 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-10 and Sigma SD10
| XZ-10 | SD10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Very accurate focusing | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-10 vs Sigma SD10 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to carry your camera often, you have to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus XZ-10 offers outside measurements of 102mm x 61mm x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") with a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs) while the Sigma SD10 has sizing of 152mm x 120mm x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") and a weight of 950 grams (2.09 lbs).
Examine the Olympus XZ-10 vs Sigma SD10 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are using at that moment. The following is the front view scale comparison of the XZ-10 vs the SD10.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the XZ-10 and SD10 is 91 and 54 respectively.
Olympus XZ-10 vs Sigma SD10 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be hard to visualize the gap between sensor sizing merely by going over specs. The photograph here might provide you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the XZ-10 and SD10.
As you can plainly see, both of the cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The XZ-10 featuring a tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF more difficult and the Olympus XZ-10 will offer you greater detail having its extra 9MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop images much more aggressively. The newer XZ-10 provides a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus XZ-10 vs Sigma SD10 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Olympus XZ-10 vs Sigma SD10 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | Sigma SD10 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Sigma |
| Model | Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | Sigma SD10 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced DSLR |
| Announced | 2013-01-30 | 2004-03-19 |
| Body design | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 20.7 x 13.8mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 285.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 3MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
| Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 2268 x 1512 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 800 |
| Max boosted ISO | - | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 35 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
| Lens focal range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | - |
| Highest aperture | f/1.8-2.7 | - |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
| Available lenses | - | 76 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.7 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inch | 1.8 inch |
| Resolution of display | 920 thousand dot | 130 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 98% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.77x |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 30 secs | 30 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/6000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | no built-in flash |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Highest flash sync | - | 1/180 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps, 18Mbps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps, 9Mbps) | - |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 221 grams (0.49 pounds) | 950 grams (2.09 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 102 x 61 x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 152 x 120 x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 photos | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | Li-50B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Compact Flash Type I or II |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Price at launch | $428 | $198 |