Clicky

Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony A290

Portability
91
Imaging
36
Features
57
Overall
44
Olympus Stylus XZ-10 front
 
Sony Alpha DSLR-A290 front
Portability
66
Imaging
54
Features
47
Overall
51

Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony A290 Key Specs

Olympus XZ-10
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 26-130mm (F1.8-2.7) lens
  • 221g - 102 x 61 x 34mm
  • Announced January 2013
Sony A290
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
  • 549g - 128 x 97 x 86mm
  • Released June 2010
  • Succeeded the Sony A230
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony A290 Overview

Below is a extensive overview of the Olympus XZ-10 and Sony A290, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by rivals Olympus and Sony. The image resolution of the XZ-10 (12MP) and the A290 (14MP) is relatively similar but the XZ-10 (1/2.3") and A290 (APS-C) enjoy different sensor sizing.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The XZ-10 was announced 2 years later than the A290 and that is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus XZ-10 being a Compact camera and the Sony A290 being a Compact SLR camera.

Before going through a full comparison, below is a quick view of how the XZ-10 scores vs the A290 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-10 over the Sony A290

 XZ-10 A290 
ReleasedJanuary 2013June 2010More recent by 33 months
Screen sizing3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution920k230kSharper screen (+690k dot)
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Reasons to pick Sony A290 over the Olympus XZ-10

 A290 XZ-10 

Common features in the Olympus XZ-10 and Sony A290

 XZ-10 A290 
Manual focus Dial exact focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen No selfie screen

Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony A290 Physical Comparison

When you are planning to lug around your camera frequently, you're going to have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus XZ-10 has got outer dimensions of 102mm x 61mm x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") with a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs) and the Sony A290 has dimensions of 128mm x 97mm x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4") with a weight of 549 grams (1.21 lbs).

Take a look at the Olympus XZ-10 and Sony A290 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are utilising during that time. Underneath is the front view sizing comparison of the XZ-10 versus the A290.

Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony A290 size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the XZ-10 and A290 is 91 and 66 respectively.

Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony A290 top view buttons comparison

Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony A290 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it is very hard to imagine the difference between sensor measurements only by reviewing a spec sheet. The photograph underneath will help give you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the XZ-10 and A290.

Clearly, both of the cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The XZ-10 with its tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field more difficult and the Sony A290 will deliver greater detail with its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop photographs far more aggressively. The fresher XZ-10 should have an edge in sensor innovation.

Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony A290 sensor size comparison

Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony A290 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony A290 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus XZ-10 Portrait photography information
Sony A290 Portrait photography information
45
focusing manually
comes with face detect focusing
supports RAW files
MP count low (12MP)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
65
manual focus
megapixel count good (14MP)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
has face detection autofocus
exports RAW files
no liveview feature
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus XZ-10
Street photography with Sony A290
61
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports RAW files
screen is fixed
small sensor size (1/2.3")
heavier than others (221g)
66
image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
exports RAW files
screen does not articulate
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Olympus XZ-10 as a Sports photography camera
Sony A290 as a Sports photography camera
34
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with tracking focus
low fps (5.0 frames per second)
MP count low (12MP)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
no phase detect AF
55
image stabilization (Sensor based)
megapixel count good (14MP)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
has phase detect autofocus
no liveview feature
low fps (3.0 fps)
terrible battery power (290 CIPA)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Olympus XZ-10 as a Travel photography camera
Sony A290 as a Travel photography camera
60
has built in flash
reasonably wide (26mm)
very good maximum aperture (f1.8)
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
heavier than others (221g)
MP count low (12MP)
screen isn't selfie friendly
53
megapixel count good (14MP)
flash built-in
no Time Lapse function
terrible battery power (290 per charge)
display isn't selfie friendly
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus XZ-10
Landscape photography with Sony A290
53
focusing manually
reasonably wide (26mm)
very good maximum aperture (f1.8)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports RAW files
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
MP count low (12MP)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
58
manual focus
interchangeable lenses (Sony/Minolta Alpha mount)
image stabilization (Sensor based)
megapixel count good (14MP)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
exports RAW files
tiny screen (2.7")
no liveview feature
terrible battery power (290 CIPA)
no Time Lapse function
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus XZ-10 as a Vlogging camera
Sony A290 as a Vlogging camera
35
reasonably wide (26mm)
very good maximum aperture (f1.8)
touchscreen enabled
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with face detect focusing
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
doesn't have mic port
heavier than others (221 grams)
9
no video shooting
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony A290 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus XZ-10 and Sony A290
 Olympus Stylus XZ-10Sony Alpha DSLR-A290
General Information
Brand Olympus Sony
Model Olympus Stylus XZ-10 Sony Alpha DSLR-A290
Category Small Sensor Compact Entry-Level DSLR
Announced 2013-01-30 2010-06-09
Body design Compact Compact SLR
Sensor Information
Chip - Bionz
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.5 x 15.7mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 369.0mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixels 14 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 3968 x 2976 4592 x 3056
Maximum native ISO 6400 3200
Min native ISO 100 100
RAW support
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Number of focus points 35 9
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens Sony/Minolta Alpha
Lens focal range 26-130mm (5.0x) -
Largest aperture f/1.8-2.7 -
Macro focus range 1cm -
Amount of lenses - 143
Focal length multiplier 5.8 1.5
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 3" 2.7"
Resolution of display 920 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Optical (pentamirror)
Viewfinder coverage - 95%
Viewfinder magnification - 0.55x
Features
Lowest shutter speed 30 seconds 30 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shooting speed 5.0fps 3.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range - 10.00 m (at ISO 100)
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, High Speed Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Highest flash sync - 1/160 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps, 18Mbps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps, 9Mbps) -
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 None
Video file format MPEG-4, H.264 -
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 221 gr (0.49 pounds) 549 gr (1.21 pounds)
Dimensions 102 x 61 x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") 128 x 97 x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested 66
DXO Color Depth score not tested 22.6
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 11.5
DXO Low light score not tested 615
Other
Battery life 240 shots 290 shots
Style of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model Li-50B NP-FH50
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo, SD/SDHC
Storage slots 1 1
Pricing at launch $428 $600