Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony A290
91 Imaging
36 Features
57 Overall
44
66 Imaging
54 Features
47 Overall
51
Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony A290 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F1.8-2.7) lens
- 221g - 102 x 61 x 34mm
- Announced January 2013
(Full Review)
- 14MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 549g - 128 x 97 x 86mm
- Released June 2010
- Succeeded the Sony A230
Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony A290 Overview
Below is a extensive overview of the Olympus XZ-10 and Sony A290, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by rivals Olympus and Sony. The image resolution of the XZ-10 (12MP) and the A290 (14MP) is relatively similar but the XZ-10 (1/2.3") and A290 (APS-C) enjoy different sensor sizing.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe XZ-10 was announced 2 years later than the A290 and that is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus XZ-10 being a Compact camera and the Sony A290 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before going through a full comparison, below is a quick view of how the XZ-10 scores vs the A290 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony A290 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus XZ-10 & Sony Alpha DSLR-A290. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus XZ-10 Gallery & Sony A290 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-10 over the Sony A290
XZ-10 | A290 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2013 | June 2010 | More recent by 33 months | |
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 920k | 230k | Sharper screen (+690k dot) | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony A290 over the Olympus XZ-10
A290 | XZ-10 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-10 and Sony A290
XZ-10 | A290 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial exact focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | No selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony A290 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to lug around your camera frequently, you're going to have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus XZ-10 has got outer dimensions of 102mm x 61mm x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") with a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs) and the Sony A290 has dimensions of 128mm x 97mm x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4") with a weight of 549 grams (1.21 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus XZ-10 and Sony A290 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are utilising during that time. Underneath is the front view sizing comparison of the XZ-10 versus the A290.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the XZ-10 and A290 is 91 and 66 respectively.
Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony A290 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very hard to imagine the difference between sensor measurements only by reviewing a spec sheet. The photograph underneath will help give you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the XZ-10 and A290.
Clearly, both of the cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The XZ-10 with its tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field more difficult and the Sony A290 will deliver greater detail with its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop photographs far more aggressively. The fresher XZ-10 should have an edge in sensor innovation.
Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony A290 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony A290 Specifications
Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A290 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A290 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level DSLR |
Announced | 2013-01-30 | 2010-06-09 |
Body design | Compact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4592 x 3056 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens focal range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | - |
Largest aperture | f/1.8-2.7 | - |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 143 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" |
Resolution of display | 920 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.55x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 30 seconds | 30 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 5.0fps | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | - | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, High Speed Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | - | 1/160 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps, 18Mbps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps, 9Mbps) | - |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 221 gr (0.49 pounds) | 549 gr (1.21 pounds) |
Dimensions | 102 x 61 x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 128 x 97 x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 66 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.6 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.5 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 615 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 shots | 290 shots |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | Li-50B | NP-FH50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo, SD/SDHC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $428 | $600 |