Clicky

Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony A350

Portability
91
Imaging
36
Features
57
Overall
44
Olympus Stylus XZ-10 front
 
Sony Alpha DSLR-A350 front
Portability
62
Imaging
53
Features
47
Overall
50

Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony A350 Key Specs

Olympus XZ-10
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 26-130mm (F1.8-2.7) lens
  • 221g - 102 x 61 x 34mm
  • Revealed January 2013
Sony A350
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 2.7" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
  • 674g - 131 x 99 x 75mm
  • Introduced June 2008
  • Newer Model is Sony A380
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony A350 Overview

In this write-up, we will be looking at the Olympus XZ-10 and Sony A350, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. The sensor resolution of the XZ-10 (12MP) and the A350 (14MP) is relatively well matched but the XZ-10 (1/2.3") and A350 (APS-C) enjoy totally different sensor size.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The XZ-10 was brought out 4 years after the A350 which is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus XZ-10 being a Compact camera and the Sony A350 being a Compact SLR camera.

Before diving in to a in depth comparison, below is a short summary of how the XZ-10 scores vs the A350 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-10 over the Sony A350

 XZ-10 A350 
IntroducedJanuary 2013June 2008More modern by 57 months
Screen sizing3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution920k230kSharper screen (+690k dot)
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Reasons to pick Sony A350 over the Olympus XZ-10

 A350 XZ-10 
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen

Common features in the Olympus XZ-10 and Sony A350

 XZ-10 A350 
Manual focus Dial accurate focusing
Selfie screen Neither includes selfie screen

Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony A350 Physical Comparison

If you are aiming to carry around your camera often, you'll have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus XZ-10 features outside dimensions of 102mm x 61mm x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") with a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs) and the Sony A350 has dimensions of 131mm x 99mm x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") with a weight of 674 grams (1.49 lbs).

Check out the Olympus XZ-10 and Sony A350 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are utilising at that time. The following is the front view proportions comparison of the XZ-10 against the A350.

Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony A350 size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the XZ-10 and A350 is 91 and 62 respectively.

Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony A350 top view buttons comparison

Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony A350 Sensor Comparison

Generally, it is difficult to see the gap between sensor sizes purely by checking a spec sheet. The image below will help give you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the XZ-10 and A350.

As you can see, the two cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The XZ-10 because of its tinier sensor will make getting shallower DOF more challenging and the Sony A350 will give greater detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop photographs far more aggressively. The more modern XZ-10 is going to have a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.

Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony A350 sensor size comparison

Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony A350 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony A350 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus XZ-10 as a Portrait photography camera
Sony A350 as a Portrait photography camera
45
you can focus manually
includes face detect focusing
delivers RAW files
low MP (12 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
71
you can focus manually
sensor resolution is decent (14MP)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus XZ-10
Street photography with Sony A350
61
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW files
screen is fixed
sensor is small (1/2.3")
heavier than competition in class (221g)
66
has a tilting screen
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
more heavy than average (674 grams)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus XZ-10
Sports photography with Sony A350
34
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
includes tracking focus
very slow continuous shooting (5.0 frames/s)
low MP (12MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect AF
66
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor resolution is decent (14MP)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
has phase detect auto focus
low fps (3.0 frames per second)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Olympus XZ-10 as a Travel photography camera
Sony A350 as a Travel photography camera
60
flash built-in
really wide (26mm)
great maximum aperture (f1.8)
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
heavier than competition in class (221 grams)
low MP (12 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
51
sensor resolution is decent (14MP)
has built in flash
missing Timelapse mode
more heavy than average (674 grams)
does not offer selfie friendly screen
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Olympus XZ-10 Landscape photography highlights
Sony A350 Landscape photography highlights
53
you can focus manually
really wide (26mm)
great maximum aperture (f1.8)
screen size is good (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW files
cannot swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
low MP (12 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
64
you can focus manually
swap lenses (Sony/Minolta Alpha mount)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor resolution is decent (14MP)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
screen is somewhat small (2.7")
missing Timelapse mode
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus XZ-10 Vlogging features
Sony A350 Vlogging features
35
really wide (26mm)
great maximum aperture (f1.8)
touchscreen enabled
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
includes face detect focusing
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
screen isn't selfie friendly
doesn't have mic support
heavier than competition in class (221g)
9
lack of video recording
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony A350 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus XZ-10 and Sony A350
 Olympus Stylus XZ-10Sony Alpha DSLR-A350
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Sony
Model type Olympus Stylus XZ-10 Sony Alpha DSLR-A350
Type Small Sensor Compact Entry-Level DSLR
Revealed 2013-01-30 2008-06-06
Physical type Compact Compact SLR
Sensor Information
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.6 x 15.8mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 372.9mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 14MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 3:2 and 16:9
Peak resolution 3968 x 2976 4592 x 3056
Highest native ISO 6400 3200
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW data
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch focus
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Total focus points 35 9
Lens
Lens support fixed lens Sony/Minolta Alpha
Lens zoom range 26-130mm (5.0x) -
Highest aperture f/1.8-2.7 -
Macro focusing range 1cm -
Number of lenses - 143
Crop factor 5.8 1.5
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Tilting
Screen diagonal 3 inches 2.7 inches
Resolution of screen 920 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Optical (pentamirror)
Viewfinder coverage - 95%
Viewfinder magnification - 0.49x
Features
Min shutter speed 30 seconds 30 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shutter rate 5.0 frames/s 3.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance - 12.00 m (at ISO 100)
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps, 18Mbps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps, 9Mbps) -
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 None
Video format MPEG-4, H.264 -
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 221g (0.49 pounds) 674g (1.49 pounds)
Dimensions 102 x 61 x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") 131 x 99 x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested 65
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 22.6
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 11.5
DXO Low light rating not tested 595
Other
Battery life 240 shots -
Form of battery Battery Pack -
Battery ID Li-50B -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC Compact Flash (Type I or II), Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, UDMA Mode 5, Supports FAT12 / FAT16 / FAT32
Card slots Single Single
Launch price $428 $600