Clicky

Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony A450

Portability
91
Imaging
36
Features
57
Overall
44
Olympus Stylus XZ-10 front
 
Sony Alpha DSLR-A450 front
Portability
65
Imaging
53
Features
52
Overall
52

Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony A450 Key Specs

Olympus XZ-10
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 26-130mm (F1.8-2.7) lens
  • 221g - 102 x 61 x 34mm
  • Released January 2013
Sony A450
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 200 - 12800
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
  • 560g - 137 x 104 x 81mm
  • Announced January 2010
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony A450: A Deep Dive for Photography Enthusiasts Exploring Compact and DSLR Options

Choosing your next camera can be a thrilling yet daunting experience, especially when comparing two very different styles like the Olympus Stylus XZ-10, a sophisticated compact, and the Sony Alpha DSLR-A450, an entry-level DSLR. Each represents a different approach to photography, with unique strengths tailored to various creative needs.

Having tested thousands of cameras in my 15+ years of reviewing, I’ll guide you through a comprehensive comparison across all important shooting scenarios, putting technical specs and real-world use side by side. Whether you're dabbling in street photography or diving into professional portraiture, this guide will help you weigh options confidently.

Let’s begin with an initial look at their physicality and ergonomics.

Hands-On Feel and Ergonomics: Compact Versatility Meets DSLR Control

The Olympus XZ-10 and the Sony A450 sit at opposite ends of the size and control spectrum.

Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony A450 size comparison

  • Olympus XZ-10: This elegant compact measures just 102x61x34 mm and weighs 221g, making it an ultra-portable choice perfect for photographers who crave convenience without sacrificing creative options. Its pocket-friendly build invites travel and everyday carry.

  • Sony A450: By contrast, the DSLR is a much larger 137x104x81 mm and weighs 560g. It’s bulkier and heavier but provides a robust grip and tactile controls preferred by photographers who want precision handling and manual dexterity.

Both cameras use fixed screens (Olympus with a 3" touchscreen, Sony with a 2.7" fixed non-touchscreen) but the XZ-10’s touchscreen makes navigating menus and selecting focus points simple and intuitive for those used to smartphones.

Turning to how the cameras look and feel from above:

Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony A450 top view buttons comparison

The Sony DSLR’s dedicated dials and buttons give you direct access to shutter speed, aperture, and exposure compensation - ideal for fast-paced shooting and learning manual controls. Olympus simplifies with fewer physical controls but emphasizes ease of use and smart automation for quick shooting on the go.

Sensor Tech & Image Quality: Small Sensor Compact vs APS-C DSLR Dynamics

Sensor size and technology are critical for image quality. The Sony A450 features a significantly larger APS-C sensor, while the Olympus XZ-10 squeezes into the 1/2.3" sensor class typical of advanced compacts.

Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony A450 sensor size comparison

Feature Olympus XZ-10 Sony A450
Sensor Size 1/2.3" BSI-CMOS (6.17x4.55 mm) APS-C CMOS (23.4x15.6 mm)
Sensor Area (mm²) 28.07 365.04
Megapixels 12 MP 14 MP
Native ISO Range 100-6400 200-12800
Raw Support Yes Yes

What does this mean in practice?

  • The Sony’s larger sensor delivers better image quality, especially in low light and at higher ISOs, owing to bigger pixel sites and improved light-gathering that reduce noise.
  • The Olympus compensates with a sharp, f/1.8-2.7 bright lens aiding in low light and shallow depth of field effects.
  • The APS-C size also supports a shallower depth of field, giving the Sony an edge in portrait bokeh and subject isolation.

The Sony’s higher max ISO (12800 vs 6400) and wider dynamic range (DxO marking 11.8 stops compared to Olympus not tested but generally more limited) make it better suited to challenging lighting like twilight landscapes or indoor sports.

Viewing and Interface: Screen and Viewfinder Options

Looking through the camera, the A450 offers a classic optical viewfinder with 95% frame coverage and 0.53x magnification. The Olympus provides no viewfinder, relying on its 3” fixed touchscreen display with 920k dots resolution.

Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony A450 Screen and Viewfinder comparison

For photographers who prefer composing in bright sunlight or require precise framing, the DSLR’s optical viewfinder is a significant advantage. However, for casual use or street photography, the Olympus touchscreen is responsive and flexible - great for focus adjustments and reviewing shots quickly.

The touchscreen also offers more intuitive navigation for beginners learning manual mode settings versus the Sony’s traditional button-driven menu.

Real-World Shooting: Focus Systems and Speed

Autofocus (AF) and shooting speed make a massive difference depending on the subject and genre:

Feature Olympus XZ-10 Sony A450
Autofocus Type Contrast-detection, 35 AF points, Face Detection Phase-detection, 9 AF points, Selective AF
Continuous Shooting 5 fps 7 fps
AF Tracking Yes No
  • Portrait & Street Photography: The Olympus’s face detection AF excels at locking onto human faces in varying conditions, making portraits straightforward for non-expert users. Its 35 contrast detection points cover more of the frame, assisting accurate focus for casual street shots and macro close-ups.

  • Sports & Wildlife: The Sony’s phase-detection AF offers faster and more reliable focus tracking for moving subjects. While it only has 9 AF points, this system enables better accuracy for action photography. The faster 7 fps burst rate beats the Olympus’s 5 fps, allowing you to capture multiple frames during fast action.

Versatility Across Photography Genres

Let’s break down how each camera performs in different photography categories, referencing practical experience and feature sets.

Portraits: Bokeh and Skin Tones

  • Sony A450: The full DSLR experience, with a larger APS-C sensor and interchangeable lenses (up to 143 Sony A-mount options), enables more artistic control. With lenses like fast primes f/1.8 or wider apertures, you get creamy bokeh and smooth skin tone reproduction thanks to the better sensor.

  • Olympus XZ-10: Despite the smaller sensor, the f/1.8 aperture on the wide end lens helps create subject separation in good light. Face detection autofocus aids consistent focus on eyes and faces, though background blur is less pronounced.

Landscape: Resolution and Dynamic Range

  • Sony’s 365 mm² sensor significantly outperforms the Olympus in dynamic range and detail, crucial for preserving shadow and highlight information in scenes with wide exposure variations. Weather sealing isn’t present on either.

Wildlife: Autofocus and Burst Rate

The Sony DSLR’s phase detection AF and 7 fps burst speed give it an edge in tracking moving animals. The fixed lens on the Olympus (26-130 mm equivalent) lacks telephoto reach desired for wildlife, making it less practical despite optical stabilization.

Sports: Tracking and Low Light Performance

Fast and accurate tracking paired with high ISO performance is key in sports:

  • Sony’s 7 fps and phase-detection AF facilitate catching peak moments.
  • Olympus’s contrast-detection AF and slower burst rate limit performance for fast sports.
  • Sony supports ISO 12800, better for indoor or evening sports.

Street Photography: Discreteness and Portability

  • Olympus is smaller, lighter, and produces less shutter sound, ideal for unobtrusive shooting.
  • Sony, while more cumbersome, offers versatility with lens choices but is less discreet.

Macro Photography: Magnification and Stabilization

Olympus’s close macro focus (1cm) combined with sensor-shift image stabilization offers excellent handheld macro shots, especially for beginners.

Sony models depend on lens choice for macro capabilities; sensor stabilization details are unspecified for A450.

Night and Astro: High ISO and Exposure Modes

Sony’s higher native ISO and superior noise handling make it better for astro and night photography. Olympus’s max ISO 6400 is decent but will show more noise in very low light.

Video Capability: Compact’s Video Edge

  • Olympus XZ-10 shoots Full HD (1080p) at 30fps and HD 720p at 30fps, encoded in MPEG-4 and H.264. It includes built-in sensor stabilization to smooth handheld footage.
  • Sony A450 lacks video recording entirely, being a still-focused DSLR.

If video creation is in your plan, the Olympus is clearly superior here despite lacking microphone or headphone jacks for external audio gear.

Build Quality, Weather Sealing, and Durability

Neither camera offers weather sealing or rugged protection - this limits all-weather usability. Olympus feels robust for a compact, but Sony’s DSLR construction is heavier and offers better durability for frequent handling and lens changes.

Battery Life and Storage

  • Battery performance: Sony leads with approximately 1050 shots per charge vs Olympus’s 240 shots.
  • The DSLR’s larger battery and lower-power LCD consumption explain this big difference - a major consideration for travel or long shooting sessions.
  • Both accept SD cards, but Sony supports Dual memory types (SD and Memory Stick).

Connectivity and Extras

  • Olympus uniquely supports Eye-Fi wireless SD cards, enabling photo transfer, while Sony has no wireless features.
  • Both offer HDMI and USB 2.0 ports, but no Bluetooth or NFC.
  • Olympus includes a touchscreen interface; Sony remains button-controlled.

Price and Value Analysis

Camera Approximate Price (USD) Value Assessment
Olympus XZ-10 $428 Affordable, versatile compact with solid features for enthusiasts and travelers
Sony A450 $1241 Entry DSLR with larger sensor, better image quality, expanded lens options; pricier but investments toward serious photography

The Sony commands almost three times the price but delivers DSLR quality and expanding opportunities for growth.

Sample Gallery: Visual Proof in Real-World Use

From our testing, Sony files show richer details, smoother bokeh, and cleaner low-light shots. Olympus excels in handy portability and decent image quality for casual daily use, including macro and street photography.

Performance Ratings Summarized

To crystallize the overall snapshot:

Genre-Specific Ratings Revealed

Detailed scores for portrait, landscape, wildlife, sports, street photography, macro, low light, video, travel, and professional work:

Final Thoughts and Recommendations

Who should pick the Olympus XZ-10?

  • Photography enthusiasts and travelers seeking a pocketable, user-friendly camera.
  • You want quick access to manual controls without learning DSLR complexities.
  • Favor compactness, touchscreen usability, and simple video capabilities.
  • Ideal for casual street photography, quick macro shots, and everyday snapshots where portability is critical.
  • Budget-sensitive buyers wanting a capable bridge camera with solid image stabilization.

Who is the Sony A450 best for?

  • Photographers ready to invest in DSLR-quality images and grow with interchangeable lenses.
  • Sports, wildlife, and landscape shooters needing faster burst rates and superior autofocus.
  • Users prioritizing image quality, depth of field control, and low light performance.
  • Those who value a traditional optical viewfinder for composition.
  • Hobbyists and semi-professionals preparing to expand gear and skills over time.

Exploring Your Next Steps

Both cameras occupy distinct niches. Olympus XZ-10 is a smart compact packed with features for creative spontaneity. Sony A450 offers a more future-proof photographic platform with professional-grade tools.

I encourage you to handle each camera in person, check out real-world sample galleries, and consider your photographic ambitions. Look into lenses if opting DSLR, and explore essential accessories like external flashes, tripods, or filters to complement your choice.

Photography is a journey of discovery - your camera is the trusted partner on this path. Pick the one that inspires you most to capture stunning moments, whether on the street or in the studio.

Summary Table: Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony A450

Aspect Olympus XZ-10 Sony A450
Camera Type Advanced Compact Entry-Level DSLR
Weight 221 g 560 g
Sensor 1/2.3” 12 MP BSI-CMOS APS-C 14 MP CMOS
Max ISO 6400 12800
Lens Fixed 26-130mm (5x zoom), F1.8-2.7 Interchangeable (Sony A-mount)
Autofocus Contrast-detection, Face detection Phase-detection, 9 AF points, Selective AF
Continuous Shooting 5 fps 7 fps
Video 1080p @30fps No video
Battery Life 240 shots 1050 shots
Viewfinder None Optical pentamirror
Weather Sealing No No
Wireless Connectivity Eye-Fi compatible None
Price (approximate) $428 $1241

Ready to explore creative expression with the ideal camera? Whether you prioritize mobility, spontaneous shooting, or expansive control, the Olympus XZ-10 and Sony A450 each ensure you can make compelling images with confidence.

Happy shooting!

Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony A450 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus XZ-10 and Sony A450
 Olympus Stylus XZ-10Sony Alpha DSLR-A450
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Sony
Model type Olympus Stylus XZ-10 Sony Alpha DSLR-A450
Type Small Sensor Compact Entry-Level DSLR
Released 2013-01-30 2010-01-05
Physical type Compact Compact SLR
Sensor Information
Processor - Bionz
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.4 x 15.6mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 365.0mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixels 14 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 3968 x 2976 4592 x 3056
Maximum native ISO 6400 12800
Lowest native ISO 100 200
RAW format
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch to focus
Continuous AF
Single AF
Tracking AF
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Total focus points 35 9
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens Sony/Minolta Alpha
Lens zoom range 26-130mm (5.0x) -
Max aperture f/1.8-2.7 -
Macro focusing range 1cm -
Available lenses - 143
Crop factor 5.8 1.5
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3" 2.7"
Display resolution 920k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Display technology - TFT Clear Photo Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Optical (pentamirror)
Viewfinder coverage - 95 percent
Viewfinder magnification - 0.53x
Features
Lowest shutter speed 30 seconds 30 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shooting rate 5.0fps 7.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance - 12.00 m (at ISO 100)
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless Auto, Fill, Rear Sync, Slow Sync, Wireless/ High Speed Sync
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Highest flash synchronize - 1/160 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps, 18Mbps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps, 9Mbps) -
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 None
Video data format MPEG-4, H.264 -
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 221 grams (0.49 pounds) 560 grams (1.23 pounds)
Physical dimensions 102 x 61 x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") 137 x 104 x 81mm (5.4" x 4.1" x 3.2")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested 66
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 21.8
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 11.8
DXO Low light rating not tested 769
Other
Battery life 240 photographs 1050 photographs
Battery type Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID Li-50B NP-FM500H
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/ SDHC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo
Card slots Single Single
Retail pricing $428 $1,241