Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony A900
91 Imaging
36 Features
57 Overall
44
54 Imaging
66 Features
62 Overall
64
Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony A900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F1.8-2.7) lens
- 221g - 102 x 61 x 34mm
- Launched January 2013
(Full Review)
- 25MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 895g - 156 x 117 x 82mm
- Revealed October 2008
- Refreshed by Sony A99
Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony A900 Overview
Following is a extended review of the Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony A900, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Advanced DSLR by brands Olympus and Sony. There is a large difference between the resolutions of the XZ-10 (12MP) and A900 (25MP) and the XZ-10 (1/2.3") and A900 (Full frame) offer totally different sensor dimensions.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe XZ-10 was unveiled 4 years after the A900 which is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus XZ-10 being a Compact camera and the Sony A900 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before getting right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a simple view of how the XZ-10 grades against the A900 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony A900 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus XZ-10 & Sony Alpha DSLR-A900. The full galleries are available at Olympus XZ-10 Gallery & Sony A900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-10 over the Sony A900
XZ-10 | A900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2013 | October 2008 | More modern by 53 months | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony A900 over the Olympus XZ-10
A900 | XZ-10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 922k | 920k | Sharper screen (+2k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus XZ-10 and Sony A900
XZ-10 | A900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial accurate focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen sizing | |
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony A900 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to carry around your camera, you will need to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus XZ-10 has got outer measurements of 102mm x 61mm x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") and a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs) while the Sony A900 has specifications of 156mm x 117mm x 82mm (6.1" x 4.6" x 3.2") with a weight of 895 grams (1.97 lbs).
Examine the Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony A900 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you select at that moment. Below is a front view over all size comparison of the XZ-10 against the A900.
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the XZ-10 and A900 is 91 and 54 respectively.
Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony A900 Sensor Comparison
Generally, its tough to envision the contrast between sensor sizes only by checking a spec sheet. The pic below will help give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the XZ-10 and A900.
As you can see, both of these cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The XZ-10 with its tinier sensor will make getting shallow DOF trickier and the Sony A900 will give extra detail having an extra 13MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The fresher XZ-10 will have an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony A900 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony A900 Specifications
Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A900 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A900 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced DSLR |
Launched | 2013-01-30 | 2008-10-22 |
Physical type | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Full frame |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 35.9 x 24mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 861.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 25MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 6048 x 4032 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens focal range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | - |
Highest aperture | f/1.8-2.7 | - |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 143 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 920 thousand dots | 922 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display tech | - | TFT Xtra Fine color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.74x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 30 seconds | 30 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/8000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 5.0 frames per second | 5.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | - | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | - | 1/250 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps, 18Mbps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps, 9Mbps) | - |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 221g (0.49 lbs) | 895g (1.97 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 102 x 61 x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 156 x 117 x 82mm (6.1" x 4.6" x 3.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 79 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.7 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.3 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 1431 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 pictures | 880 pictures |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | Li-50B | NP-FM500H |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Compact Flash (Type I or II), Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, UDMA Mode 5, Supports FAT12 / FAT16 / FAT32 |
Card slots | One | Two |
Price at launch | $428 | $2,736 |