Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony NEX-3
91 Imaging
36 Features
57 Overall
44
89 Imaging
54 Features
55 Overall
54
Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony NEX-3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F1.8-2.7) lens
- 221g - 102 x 61 x 34mm
- Released January 2013
(Full Review)
- 14MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 12800
- 1280 x 720 video
- Sony E Mount
- 297g - 117 x 62 x 33mm
- Launched June 2010
- Successor is Sony NEX-C3
Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony NEX-3 Overview
Below, we are reviewing the Olympus XZ-10 versus Sony NEX-3, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by companies Olympus and Sony. The resolution of the XZ-10 (12MP) and the NEX-3 (14MP) is very well matched but the XZ-10 (1/2.3") and NEX-3 (APS-C) enjoy different sensor dimensions.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe XZ-10 was introduced 2 years later than the NEX-3 and that is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus XZ-10 being a Compact camera and the Sony NEX-3 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving through a step-by-step comparison, below is a short highlight of how the XZ-10 matches up vs the NEX-3 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony NEX-3 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus XZ-10 & Sony Alpha NEX-3. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus XZ-10 Gallery & Sony NEX-3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-10 over the Sony NEX-3
XZ-10 | NEX-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2013 | June 2010 | Fresher by 33 months | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony NEX-3 over the Olympus XZ-10
NEX-3 | XZ-10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display |
Common features in the Olympus XZ-10 and Sony NEX-3
XZ-10 | NEX-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial accurate focus | |||
Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display sizing | |
Display resolution | 920k | 920k | Equal display resolution | |
Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony NEX-3 Physical Comparison
When you are going to carry your camera often, you are going to need to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus XZ-10 comes with outer dimensions of 102mm x 61mm x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") along with a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs) and the Sony NEX-3 has sizing of 117mm x 62mm x 33mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.3") along with a weight of 297 grams (0.65 lbs).
Compare the Olympus XZ-10 versus Sony NEX-3 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are employing at the time. Below is the front view overall size comparison of the XZ-10 against the NEX-3.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the XZ-10 and NEX-3 is 91 and 89 respectively.
Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony NEX-3 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is hard to visualize the difference between sensor sizing just by looking at specifications. The visual here may provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the XZ-10 and NEX-3.
Plainly, both the cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The XZ-10 with its tinier sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field more challenging and the Sony NEX-3 will give more detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop photos much more aggressively. The more modern XZ-10 provides a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony NEX-3 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony NEX-3 Specifications
Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | Sony Alpha NEX-3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | Sony Alpha NEX-3 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Released | 2013-01-30 | 2010-06-07 |
Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 365.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4592 x 3056 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sony E |
Lens focal range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | - |
Maximum aperture | f/1.8-2.7 | - |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 121 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen size | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 920k dots | 920k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT Xtra Fine LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 30 seconds | 30 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 5.0 frames/s | 7.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | - | 12.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | - | 1/160 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps, 18Mbps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps, 9Mbps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 221 gr (0.49 pounds) | 297 gr (0.65 pounds) |
Dimensions | 102 x 61 x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 117 x 62 x 33mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 68 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.1 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.0 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 830 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 images | 330 images |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | Li-50B | NPFW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10sec (3 images)) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Price at launch | $428 | $0 |