Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony NEX-5R
91 Imaging
36 Features
57 Overall
44
89 Imaging
56 Features
76 Overall
64
Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony NEX-5R Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F1.8-2.7) lens
- 221g - 102 x 61 x 34mm
- Introduced January 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 276g - 111 x 59 x 39mm
- Launched August 2012
- Old Model is Sony NEX-5N
- Successor is Sony NEX-5T
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony NEX-5R Overview
Following is a detailed comparison of the Olympus XZ-10 and Sony NEX-5R, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by rivals Olympus and Sony. There exists a large gap among the sensor resolutions of the XZ-10 (12MP) and NEX-5R (16MP) and the XZ-10 (1/2.3") and NEX-5R (APS-C) provide different sensor sizes.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe XZ-10 was revealed 6 months after the NEX-5R which means that they are of a similar age. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus XZ-10 being a Compact camera and the Sony NEX-5R being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go right into a full comparison, here is a brief summary of how the XZ-10 grades against the NEX-5R when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony NEX-5R Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus XZ-10 & Sony Alpha NEX-5R. The full galleries are available at Olympus XZ-10 Gallery & Sony NEX-5R Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-10 over the Sony NEX-5R
| XZ-10 | NEX-5R |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sony NEX-5R over the Olympus XZ-10
| NEX-5R | XZ-10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Common features in the Olympus XZ-10 and Sony NEX-5R
| XZ-10 | NEX-5R | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2013 | August 2012 | Same age | |
| Manually focus | More accurate focus | |||
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen dimensions | |
| Screen resolution | 920k | 920k | Equal screen resolution | |
| Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony NEX-5R Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to carry around your camera often, you'll have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus XZ-10 offers physical dimensions of 102mm x 61mm x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") along with a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs) whilst the Sony NEX-5R has measurements of 111mm x 59mm x 39mm (4.4" x 2.3" x 1.5") and a weight of 276 grams (0.61 lbs).
Look at the Olympus XZ-10 and Sony NEX-5R in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are employing at that moment. Here is a front view measurement comparison of the XZ-10 vs the NEX-5R.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the XZ-10 and NEX-5R is 91 and 89 respectively.
Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony NEX-5R Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its difficult to imagine the difference in sensor sizes just by going through a spec sheet. The image below might provide you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the XZ-10 and NEX-5R.
As you can see, the 2 cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The XZ-10 having a smaller sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF more challenging and the Sony NEX-5R will show greater detail because of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop photographs a bit more aggressively.
Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony NEX-5R Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony NEX-5R Specifications
| Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | Sony Alpha NEX-5R | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Sony |
| Model | Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | Sony Alpha NEX-5R |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Introduced | 2013-01-30 | 2012-08-29 |
| Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | Bionz |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 365.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4912 x 3264 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 25600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 35 | 99 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sony E |
| Lens focal range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | - |
| Largest aperture | f/1.8-2.7 | - |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
| Total lenses | - | 121 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 920k dot | 920k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen technology | - | Tilt Up 180� Down 50� TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 30 secs | 30 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames per second | 10.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | no built-in flash |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Highest flash sync | - | 1/160 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps, 18Mbps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps, 9Mbps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | AVCHD |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 221 grams (0.49 pounds) | 276 grams (0.61 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 102 x 61 x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 111 x 59 x 39mm (4.4" x 2.3" x 1.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | 78 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.7 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 13.1 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 910 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 photographs | 330 photographs |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | Li-50B | NPFW50 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10sec (3 images)) |
| Time lapse recording | With downloadable app | |
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $428 | $750 |