Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony NEX-5R
91 Imaging
36 Features
57 Overall
44
89 Imaging
57 Features
76 Overall
64
Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony NEX-5R Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F1.8-2.7) lens
- 221g - 102 x 61 x 34mm
- Introduced January 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 276g - 111 x 59 x 39mm
- Launched August 2012
- Old Model is Sony NEX-5N
- Successor is Sony NEX-5T
Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony NEX-5R Overview
Following is a detailed comparison of the Olympus XZ-10 and Sony NEX-5R, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by rivals Olympus and Sony. There exists a large gap among the sensor resolutions of the XZ-10 (12MP) and NEX-5R (16MP) and the XZ-10 (1/2.3") and NEX-5R (APS-C) provide different sensor sizes.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe XZ-10 was revealed 6 months after the NEX-5R which means that they are of a similar age. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus XZ-10 being a Compact camera and the Sony NEX-5R being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go right into a full comparison, here is a brief summary of how the XZ-10 grades against the NEX-5R when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony NEX-5R Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus XZ-10 & Sony Alpha NEX-5R. The full galleries are available at Olympus XZ-10 Gallery & Sony NEX-5R Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-10 over the Sony NEX-5R
XZ-10 | NEX-5R |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony NEX-5R over the Olympus XZ-10
NEX-5R | XZ-10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Common features in the Olympus XZ-10 and Sony NEX-5R
XZ-10 | NEX-5R | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2013 | August 2012 | Same age | |
Manually focus | More accurate focus | |||
Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen dimensions | |
Screen resolution | 920k | 920k | Equal screen resolution | |
Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony NEX-5R Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to carry around your camera often, you'll have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus XZ-10 offers physical dimensions of 102mm x 61mm x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") along with a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs) whilst the Sony NEX-5R has measurements of 111mm x 59mm x 39mm (4.4" x 2.3" x 1.5") and a weight of 276 grams (0.61 lbs).
Look at the Olympus XZ-10 and Sony NEX-5R in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are employing at that moment. Here is a front view measurement comparison of the XZ-10 vs the NEX-5R.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the XZ-10 and NEX-5R is 91 and 89 respectively.
Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony NEX-5R Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its difficult to imagine the difference in sensor sizes just by going through a spec sheet. The image below might provide you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the XZ-10 and NEX-5R.
As you can see, the 2 cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The XZ-10 having a smaller sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF more challenging and the Sony NEX-5R will show greater detail because of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop photographs a bit more aggressively.
Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony NEX-5R Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony NEX-5R Specifications
Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | Sony Alpha NEX-5R | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | Sony Alpha NEX-5R |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2013-01-30 | 2012-08-29 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 365.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4912 x 3264 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | 99 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sony E |
Lens focal range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | - |
Largest aperture | f/1.8-2.7 | - |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 121 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 920k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen technology | - | Tilt Up 180� Down 50� TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 30 secs | 30 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames per second | 10.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | - | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | - | 1/160 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps, 18Mbps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps, 9Mbps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | AVCHD |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 221 grams (0.49 pounds) | 276 grams (0.61 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 102 x 61 x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 111 x 59 x 39mm (4.4" x 2.3" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 78 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.7 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 13.1 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 910 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 photographs | 330 photographs |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | Li-50B | NPFW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10sec (3 images)) |
Time lapse recording | With downloadable app | |
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $428 | $750 |