Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony NEX-5R
91 Imaging
36 Features
57 Overall
44
89 Imaging
56 Features
76 Overall
64
Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony NEX-5R Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F1.8-2.7) lens
- 221g - 102 x 61 x 34mm
- Introduced January 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 276g - 111 x 59 x 39mm
- Launched August 2012
- Old Model is Sony NEX-5N
- Successor is Sony NEX-5T
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony NEX-5R Overview
Following is a detailed comparison of the Olympus XZ-10 and Sony NEX-5R, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by rivals Olympus and Sony. There exists a large gap among the sensor resolutions of the XZ-10 (12MP) and NEX-5R (16MP) and the XZ-10 (1/2.3") and NEX-5R (APS-C) provide different sensor sizes.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe XZ-10 was revealed 6 months after the NEX-5R which means that they are of a similar age. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus XZ-10 being a Compact camera and the Sony NEX-5R being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go right into a full comparison, here is a brief summary of how the XZ-10 grades against the NEX-5R when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony NEX-5R Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus XZ-10 & Sony Alpha NEX-5R. The full galleries are available at Olympus XZ-10 Gallery & Sony NEX-5R Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-10 over the Sony NEX-5R
| XZ-10 | NEX-5R |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sony NEX-5R over the Olympus XZ-10
| NEX-5R | XZ-10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Common features in the Olympus XZ-10 and Sony NEX-5R
| XZ-10 | NEX-5R | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2013 | August 2012 | Same age | |
| Manually focus | More accurate focus | |||
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen dimensions | |
| Screen resolution | 920k | 920k | Equal screen resolution | |
| Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony NEX-5R Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to carry around your camera often, you'll have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus XZ-10 offers physical dimensions of 102mm x 61mm x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") along with a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs) whilst the Sony NEX-5R has measurements of 111mm x 59mm x 39mm (4.4" x 2.3" x 1.5") and a weight of 276 grams (0.61 lbs).
Look at the Olympus XZ-10 and Sony NEX-5R in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are employing at that moment. Here is a front view measurement comparison of the XZ-10 vs the NEX-5R.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the XZ-10 and NEX-5R is 91 and 89 respectively.
Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony NEX-5R Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its difficult to imagine the difference in sensor sizes just by going through a spec sheet. The image below might provide you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the XZ-10 and NEX-5R.
As you can see, the 2 cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The XZ-10 having a smaller sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF more challenging and the Sony NEX-5R will show greater detail because of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop photographs a bit more aggressively.
Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony NEX-5R Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony NEX-5R Specifications
| Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | Sony Alpha NEX-5R | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Sony |
| Model | Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | Sony Alpha NEX-5R |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Introduced | 2013-01-30 | 2012-08-29 |
| Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | Bionz |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 365.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4912 x 3264 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 25600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 35 | 99 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sony E |
| Lens focal range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | - |
| Largest aperture | f/1.8-2.7 | - |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
| Total lenses | - | 121 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 920k dot | 920k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen technology | - | Tilt Up 180� Down 50� TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 30 secs | 30 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames per second | 10.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | no built-in flash |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Highest flash sync | - | 1/160 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps, 18Mbps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps, 9Mbps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | AVCHD |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 221 grams (0.49 pounds) | 276 grams (0.61 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 102 x 61 x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 111 x 59 x 39mm (4.4" x 2.3" x 1.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | 78 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.7 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 13.1 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 910 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 photographs | 330 photographs |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | Li-50B | NPFW50 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10sec (3 images)) |
| Time lapse recording | With downloadable app | |
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $428 | $750 |