Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony NEX-C3
91 Imaging
36 Features
57 Overall
44
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/82a12/82a1263e2fcea5ac4d6bef1198741cbea2097fd0" alt="Olympus Stylus XZ-10 front Olympus Stylus XZ-10 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2cec1/2cec10f20284888a461f10799c9bdd17f4863091" alt="Sony Alpha NEX-C3 front Sony Alpha NEX-C3 front"
91 Imaging
56 Features
57 Overall
56
Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony NEX-C3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F1.8-2.7) lens
- 221g - 102 x 61 x 34mm
- Revealed January 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- 1280 x 720 video
- Sony E Mount
- 225g - 110 x 60 x 33mm
- Revealed August 2011
- Older Model is Sony NEX-3
- New Model is Sony NEX-F3
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony NEX-C3 Overview
Let's look more in depth at the Olympus XZ-10 versus Sony NEX-C3, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by companies Olympus and Sony. There is a sizable difference among the sensor resolutions of the XZ-10 (12MP) and NEX-C3 (16MP) and the XZ-10 (1/2.3") and NEX-C3 (APS-C) offer totally different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The XZ-10 was introduced 18 months later than the NEX-C3 making them a generation apart from each other. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus XZ-10 being a Compact camera and the Sony NEX-C3 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting right into a more detailed comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the XZ-10 scores versus the NEX-C3 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony NEX-C3 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus XZ-10 & Sony Alpha NEX-C3. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus XZ-10 Gallery & Sony NEX-C3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-10 over the Sony NEX-C3
XZ-10 | NEX-C3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2013 | ![]() | August 2011 | Fresher by 18 months |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony NEX-C3 over the Olympus XZ-10
NEX-C3 | XZ-10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Common features in the Olympus XZ-10 and Sony NEX-C3
XZ-10 | NEX-C3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very accurate focus | ||
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal display sizing |
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 920k | Identical display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony NEX-C3 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to carry your camera, you have to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus XZ-10 enjoys outer dimensions of 102mm x 61mm x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") and a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs) while the Sony NEX-C3 has sizing of 110mm x 60mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") with a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs).
Compare the Olympus XZ-10 versus Sony NEX-C3 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Following is a front view dimension comparison of the XZ-10 vs the NEX-C3.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d1f4d/d1f4d13da1190a054bac475e510e31a9202f26a2" alt="Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony NEX-C3 size comparison Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony NEX-C3 size comparison"
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the XZ-10 and NEX-C3 is 91 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/87dab/87dab535f7fcb4c96b567a0f02d15cc3b235b80b" alt="Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony NEX-C3 top view buttons comparison Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony NEX-C3 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony NEX-C3 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very tough to visualise the gap in sensor sizing simply by going through specifications. The graphic here will provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the XZ-10 and NEX-C3.
Plainly, both of the cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The XZ-10 with its smaller sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field trickier and the Sony NEX-C3 will produce extra detail using its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop pics a bit more aggressively. The younger XZ-10 will have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/382fe/382fe832eedf286b054667d9d8ee3ff755dfd974" alt="Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony NEX-C3 sensor size comparison Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony NEX-C3 sensor size comparison"
Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony NEX-C3 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f9fa2/f9fa2720364faedfcd42956a960ee34510609104" alt="Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony NEX-C3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony NEX-C3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony NEX-C3 Specifications
Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | Sony Alpha NEX-C3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | Sony Alpha NEX-C3 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2013-01-30 | 2011-08-22 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 365.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4912 x 3264 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sony E |
Lens focal range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | - |
Maximum aperture | f/1.8-2.7 | - |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 121 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 920k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display technology | - | TFT Xtra Fine LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 30 seconds | 30 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 5.0fps | 6.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | - | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | - | 1/160 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps, 18Mbps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps, 9Mbps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 221 grams (0.49 lbs) | 225 grams (0.50 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 102 x 61 x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 110 x 60 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 73 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.7 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.2 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 1083 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 images | 400 images |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | Li-50B | NPFW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec 3 or 5 images) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail pricing | $428 | $343 |