Clicky

Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony NEX-F3

Portability
91
Imaging
36
Features
57
Overall
44
Olympus Stylus XZ-10 front
 
Sony Alpha NEX-F3 front
Portability
86
Imaging
57
Features
60
Overall
58

Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony NEX-F3 Key Specs

Olympus XZ-10
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 26-130mm (F1.8-2.7) lens
  • 221g - 102 x 61 x 34mm
  • Announced January 2013
Sony NEX-F3
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 200 - 16000
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Sony E Mount
  • 314g - 117 x 67 x 42mm
  • Announced August 2012
  • Old Model is Sony NEX-C3
  • Later Model is Sony NEX-3N
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony NEX-F3 Overview

Let's examine more closely at the Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony NEX-F3, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by rivals Olympus and Sony. There is a substantial difference between the sensor resolutions of the XZ-10 (12MP) and NEX-F3 (16MP) and the XZ-10 (1/2.3") and NEX-F3 (APS-C) feature different sensor sizing.

Photography Glossary

The XZ-10 was introduced 6 months after the NEX-F3 so they are of a similar age. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus XZ-10 being a Compact camera and the Sony NEX-F3 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before getting through a more detailed comparison, below is a brief overview of how the XZ-10 scores versus the NEX-F3 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-10 over the Sony NEX-F3

 XZ-10 NEX-F3 
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Sony NEX-F3 over the Olympus XZ-10

 NEX-F3 XZ-10 
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display

Common features in the Olympus XZ-10 and Sony NEX-F3

 XZ-10 NEX-F3 
AnnouncedJanuary 2013August 2012Similar age
Manual focus Very exact focus
Display dimension3"3"Identical display measurement
Display resolution920k920kThe same display resolution
Selfie screen Neither contains selfie screen

Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony NEX-F3 Physical Comparison

When you are aiming to carry around your camera, you are going to need to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus XZ-10 has got exterior dimensions of 102mm x 61mm x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") having a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs) and the Sony NEX-F3 has sizing of 117mm x 67mm x 42mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.7") along with a weight of 314 grams (0.69 lbs).

Check out the Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony NEX-F3 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you select during that time. Underneath is the front view measurement comparison of the XZ-10 compared to the NEX-F3.

Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony NEX-F3 size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the XZ-10 and NEX-F3 is 91 and 86 respectively.

Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony NEX-F3 top view buttons comparison

Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony NEX-F3 Sensor Comparison

Usually, it's hard to visualize the contrast between sensor sizes purely by going over specs. The image here will offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the XZ-10 and NEX-F3.

All in all, both the cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The XZ-10 using its tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field tougher and the Sony NEX-F3 will deliver extra detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop images somewhat more aggressively.

Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony NEX-F3 sensor size comparison

Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony NEX-F3 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony NEX-F3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus XZ-10 Portrait photography features
Sony NEX-F3 Portrait photography features
45
focusing manually
provides face detect focusing
exports RAW files
resolution not great (12MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
74
manual focus
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
exports RAW formats
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Olympus XZ-10 as a Street photography camera
Sony NEX-F3 as a Street photography camera
61
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
exports RAW files
no moving screen
sensor is small (1/2.3")
heavier than others (221 grams)
76
screen tilts
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
exports RAW formats
no image stabilization
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus XZ-10
Sports photography with Sony NEX-F3
34
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides tracking focus
continuous shooting slow (5.0 fps)
resolution not great (12MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect AF
53
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
better than average battery power (470 per charge)
painfully slow continuous shooting (6.0 frames per second)
no image stabilization
does not have phase detect AF
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Olympus XZ-10 Travel photography features
Sony NEX-F3 Travel photography features
60
has built in flash
decently wide (26mm)
great maximum aperture (f1.8)
missing Time Lapse recording
heavier than others (221g)
resolution not great (12 megapixels)
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
69
better than average battery power (470 per charge)
decent megapixels (16MP)
has built in flash
lack of Time Lapse function
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Olympus XZ-10 Landscape photography factors
Sony NEX-F3 Landscape photography factors
53
focusing manually
decently wide (26mm)
great maximum aperture (f1.8)
good sized screen (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
exports RAW files
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
resolution not great (12MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
missing Time Lapse recording
70
manual focus
change lenses (Sony E mount)
screen size is good (3 inch)
decent megapixels (16MP)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
exports RAW formats
better than average battery power (470 shots)
no image stabilization
lack of Time Lapse function
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus XZ-10 as a Vlogging camera
Sony NEX-F3 as a Vlogging camera
35
decently wide (26mm)
great maximum aperture (f1.8)
built-in touchscreen
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides face detect focusing
video res high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
missing mic support
heavier than others (221 grams)
27
video res high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
no image stabilization
lack of external mic socket
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony NEX-F3 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus XZ-10 and Sony NEX-F3
 Olympus Stylus XZ-10Sony Alpha NEX-F3
General Information
Brand Olympus Sony
Model type Olympus Stylus XZ-10 Sony Alpha NEX-F3
Class Small Sensor Compact Entry-Level Mirrorless
Announced 2013-01-30 2012-08-16
Physical type Compact Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Chip - Bionz
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.4 x 15.6mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 365.0mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 16MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 3968 x 2976 4912 x 3264
Max native ISO 6400 16000
Minimum native ISO 100 200
RAW images
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Total focus points 35 25
Lens
Lens support fixed lens Sony E
Lens zoom range 26-130mm (5.0x) -
Maximum aperture f/1.8-2.7 -
Macro focusing distance 1cm -
Amount of lenses - 121
Crop factor 5.8 1.5
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Tilting
Screen sizing 3" 3"
Resolution of screen 920k dots 920k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Screen technology - TFT Xtra Fine LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Electronic (optional)
Features
Lowest shutter speed 30 secs 30 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shooting rate 5.0 frames/s 6.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Highest flash synchronize - 1/160 secs
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps, 18Mbps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps, 9Mbps) 1920 x 1080 (60, 24 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 1920x1080 1920x1080
Video file format MPEG-4, H.264 MPEG-4, AVCHD
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 221 grams (0.49 lbs) 314 grams (0.69 lbs)
Dimensions 102 x 61 x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") 117 x 67 x 42mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested 73
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 22.7
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 12.3
DXO Low light rating not tested 1114
Other
Battery life 240 pictures 470 pictures
Form of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID Li-50B NPFW50
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec 3 or 5 images)
Time lapse shooting
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo
Card slots One One
Cost at launch $428 $470