Olympus Stylus XZ-10 vs Sony Cyber-shot HX50V: An Expert’s Hands-On Comparison for Enthusiasts and Professionals

Choosing between two compact cameras that debuted around the same time yet boast distinctly different strengths is always a rewarding challenge. The Olympus Stylus XZ-10 and the Sony Cyber-shot HX50V are prime examples - both launched in the 2013 small sensor compact genre, but each with a unique design philosophy and feature set that cater to strikingly different photographic needs.

After extensive hands-on testing, shooting across a variety of real-world conditions and photographic genres, I’ll unpack how these cameras differ both technically and practically. Whether you prioritize zoom range, image quality, portability, or video, you’ll find a clear picture emerging to guide your purchase.

First Impressions: Size, Feel, and Controls

Before diving into sensor specs or focusing systems, the physical experience of the camera matters - especially for any photographer who spends extended time shooting.

Though both are compact, the Olympus XZ-10 is notably more pocket-friendly at 102 x 61 x 34 mm and 221 grams, while the Sony HX50V tips the scales at 272 grams with its 108 x 64 x 38 mm body. The subtle yet critical ergonomic differences become apparent when holding each camera for extended bursts.

The XZ-10 sports a smooth, modern compact form with a well-contoured grip that suits one-handed operation. The HX50V feels a bit more robust, somewhat bulkier due to its extensive zoom lens assembly, but still manageable for travel or casual outing photography.

Looking at the top plate:

Olympus keeps it simple with a clean dial layout and dedicated exposure mode buttons oriented towards traditional shooters who appreciate manual exposure and quick adjustments. Sony opts for a slightly busier but logical layout with the zoom lever wrapping the shutter button - a necessity for controlling the extreme 30x telephoto zoom - and dedicated video record button, which photographers focused on hybrid shooting will appreciate.

In practice, I found the Olympus more intuitive when quickly switching shooting modes and adjusting aperture/shutter priority, but the Sony’s zoom lever felt smooth and reliable for framing shots at extreme focal lengths.

Sensor and Image Quality: A Tale of Two 1/2.3” BSI CMOS Sensors

Both cameras employ a 1/2.3-inch BSI CMOS sensor measuring roughly 6.17 x 4.55 mm, but that’s where the similarity ends. The Olympus XZ-10 has a 12-megapixel sensor, tailored more for cleaner low-light performance and subtle color rendition, while the Sony HX50V ups the resolution stakes to 20 megapixels - about a 70% increase.

Now, more megapixels on the same sensor size means smaller photosites, which can compromise noise levels and dynamic range. However, Sony’s newer BSI technology compensates somewhat, and their processor excels in noise reduction - although at the expense of fine detail in shadows when cranked up.

In real-world shooting, Olympus's XZ-10 delivers cleaner images at ISO 800 and above, retaining more natural gradations and smoother skin tones, which portrait enthusiasts will appreciate. The Sony HX50V offers higher resolution images with more punch in well-lit conditions, making it ideal for landscapes or travel shots where you want the option to crop heavily.

Neither camera breaks photographic ground in dynamic range, but Olympus slightly edges Sony in preserving shadow detail without speckling. This results in more pleasing tonal transitions in tricky light - say, a forest scene or backlit subject.

Display and Interface: Navigating Your Camera’s Brain

Both cameras feature 3-inch displays at nearly identical resolutions (920k vs 921k dots). The Olympus XZ-10 surprises with touchscreen capabilities, a welcome and rare inclusion for its era, streamlining autofocus point selection, menu navigation, and reviewing images. My personal preference leans towards this tactile interface, especially when experimenting with focus points in macro or portrait shooting.

Sony’s HX50V uses a traditional non-touch XtraFine LCD. While the display quality is excellent - bright and clear under most lighting - the lack of touch slows interactive operations, which could be a downside for users who want quick AF point changes on the fly.

One notable omission on both cameras is an integrated electronic viewfinder (EVF). The Sony HX50V supports an optional EVF accessory, but Olympus lacks this altogether, limiting composition options in bright sunlight.

Autofocus and Speed: Capturing That Decisive Moment

You’d expect Olympus’s fewer focus points (35 contrast detection on XZ-10) versus Sony’s unknown but more sophisticated contrast detection plus multi-area tracking on HX50V to result in Sony’s autofocus outperforming - and generally, it does.

The Sony HX50V offers a faster continuous burst of 10 fps, twice the 5 fps of Olympus, which makes the Sony better suited for action, street candids, or wildlife bursts - although autofocus doesn’t track moving subjects as seamlessly as mirrorless cameras.

Olympus’s AF system stays competitive in single autofocus mode with reliable face detection, and I found its AF accuracy to be surprisingly strong in low contrast and indoor scenarios despite the slower speed.

If you are aiming to freeze quick-moving subjects or shoot sporadic fast action, Sony has the edge on burst speed and slightly better autofocus tracking. But for portraiture with deliberate focus control, or street photography focused on single shots, Olympus’s autofocus feels accurate and dependable.

Lens and Zoom Range: Versatility vs Brightness

Possibly the most obvious difference is in the lenses:

• Olympus Stylus XZ-10: 26-130 mm (5x zoom), max aperture F1.8-2.7
• Sony HX50V: 24-720 mm (30x zoom), max aperture F3.5-6.3

This is exactly where usage preferences play a huge role. The Olympus’s wide aperture at the short end (F1.8) is a boon for low-light, portraits, and shallow depth of field - critical for those beautiful bokeh backgrounds and softer skin tones. Its macro focus begins at only 1 cm, which is exceptional for close-up shots.

Meanwhile, the Sony HX50V’s 30x zoom dominates for travel, wildlife, and situational shooting where lens swapping isn’t an option and you need frames from few cm to hundreds meters away. The tradeoff is the narrower max aperture, which narrows severely as you zoom in (down to F6.3), limiting low-light shooting at telephoto.

If you like long reach with acceptable performance, Sony wins hands down. But for speed, low light, and portraiture, Olympus’s faster lens matters more.

Image Stabilization: Keeping It Sharp

Olympus uses sensor-shift stabilization, which moves the sensor to compensate for hand shake, while Sony utilizes optical lens stabilization, shifting lens elements to keep the shot steady.

Through testing, both systems yield commendable results - roughly 3 stops of stabilization. Olympus’s sensor-shift may have a slight edge in macro and short telephoto ranges where subtle movements matter most, while Sony’s optical method buds well for long telephoto reach, helping prevent shake at 720 mm equivalent focal length.

Stabilization will be a vital consideration if you often shoot without a tripod, especially for the long zoom of the HX50V.

Video Shooting: Which One Ticks More Boxes?

Both record Full HD 1080p video but with different frame rates and codec formats:

• Olympus XZ-10 shoots 1080p at 30 fps with MPEG-4/H.264
• Sony HX50V offers 1080p at 60 fps using AVCHD or MPEG-4

Sony’s higher frame rate options make it better suited for smoother video and slow motion in post production. There’s also a broader range of lower resolution options for quicker sharing or lengthier recording.

However, neither camera supports external microphones or headphone jacks, limiting audio quality control - a minor gripe, but notable for serious videographers.

Neither model supports 4K or advanced video stabilization beyond their optical/sensor smoothing, so don’t expect cinematic footage without additional gear. That said, Sony’s HD video at 60 fps gives it a slight edge for casual video content.

Battery Life and Storage: Practical Usability

Sony’s HX50V remarkably lasts up to 400 shots per charge, nearly double the Olympus’s 240. For travel or longer outings without convenient charging, Sony is clearly more economical.

Both cameras use a single memory card slot but differ in compatible cards: Olympus relies on SD/SDHC/SDXC, while Sony handles both SD cards plus Sony’s Memory Stick formats - irrelevant for most users but worth noting.

Connectivity and Extras: GPS, Wireless, and More

The Sony HX50V includes built-in GPS, making it a clear choice if geotagging your photos is a priority. Olympus offers none.

Wireless connectivity is present on both, with Olympus supporting Eye-Fi cards, while Sony has built-in Wi-Fi - giving Sony an advantage for on-the-go sharing.

Build Quality and Weather Resistance

Neither camera boasts environmental sealing or rugged body features. Both are designed as everyday compacts rather than pro tools suited for challenging weather or rough handling.

How Do These Cameras Hold Up Across Different Photography Genres?

Olympus XZ 10 front Olympus XZ 10 screen back Sony HX50V front Sony HX50V screen back

I tested both cameras across the full spectrum of typical photography disciplines. Here's what I found:

Portrait Photography

• Olympus XZ-10 produces softer skin tones, thanks to its faster lens and cleaner noise performance at medium ISO, crucial for flattering portraits with bokeh.
• Sony HX50V’s higher resolution allows cropping but tends to produce colder skin tones and harsher detail under artificial light.

Landscape Photography

• The Sony’s 20 MP yields more detail and cropping potential, but Olympus's cleaner shadows and wider aperture deliver more atmospheric results.
• Neither camera is weather sealed, so pack accordingly.

Wildlife Photography

• Sony’s 30x zoom and faster continuous shooting shines here - capturing distant subjects with relative ease.
• Olympus’s slower burst rate and shorter zoom limit use in this genre.

Sports Photography

• Sony’s 10 fps burst edges Olympus’s 5 fps but tracking isn’t perfect on either.
• Neither is ideal when compared with dedicated DSLR/ML models.

Street Photography

• Olympus excels with compact size, quieter operation, and excellent low light options.
• Sony is larger and more conspicuous, but zoom versatility is a bonus.

Macro Photography

• Olympus’s 1 cm macro capability and sensor-shift stabilization make it a better choice here.
• Sony’s minimum 5 cm focus is less close, but zoom flexibility helps.

Night and Astrophotography

• Olympus maintains cleaner images at high ISO.
• Neither has advanced exposure modes like bulb, which hampers star trail photography.

Video Shooting

• Sony’s 1080p60fps and more codec options are persuasive.
• Olympus offers touchscreen focus during video, a handy feature.

Travel Photography

• Sony's longer battery life and zoom range make it versatile for travel, but it’s marginally bulkier.
• Olympus’s portability and image quality favor enthusiasts focused on quality over reach.

Professional Uses

• Neither camera will satisfy pro workflows needing RAW flexibility or rugged reliability.
• Olympus supports RAW capture; Sony does not - a key consideration for post-processing.

Performance and Scoring: The Final Analysis

Genre-Specific Recommendations: Matching Cameras to Photography Types

Summing Up: Which Camera Should You Pick?

• Choose Olympus Stylus XZ-10 if:

  • You prioritize image quality and shallow depth of field in a super compact, portable body
  • Portraits, low light, macro, and street photography are your passions
  • RAW support and touchscreen control enhance your creative workflow
  • You want simple handling with solid ergonomics and decent battery life

• Choose Sony Cyber-shot HX50V if:

  • You need extreme telephoto reach to capture wildlife, distant landscapes, or travel scenes without exchanging lenses
  • Video capability at 60 fps and built-in GPS matter to your shooting style
  • Longer battery life and built-in wireless features are crucial for extended trips
  • You accept slightly larger size for significantly greater zoom versatility

Ultimately, the two cameras serve very different niches despite similar appearances. Olympus prioritizes traditional photographic quality and control in a neat package. Sony favors superzoom versatility and video for hybrid shooters.

Final Tip: Test Handling Yourself

Specifications tell a large part of the story, but I strongly recommend handling each in-store or renting before purchase. Controls, grip feel, menu flow, and autofocus reliability are best judged directly - especially for cameras which are your creative tools and companions.

In my fifteen years shooting and reviewing, I’ve seen compact cameras evolve dramatically, yet these two reflect a crossroads: pure photographic expression versus versatile zoomed exploration. Both remain charming and capable choices depending on what you value most. What’s your photographic style? That will determine your best fit.

If you want my hands-on video review and sample images alongside this article, just ask - I’m always eager to add more real-world input!

Thanks for reading. If you have any questions or need genre-specific advice, drop a line below - I’m here to help you navigate the complex but thrilling world of photography gear.

The End