Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony TX200V
91 Imaging
36 Features
57 Overall
44
96 Imaging
42 Features
48 Overall
44
Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony TX200V Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F1.8-2.7) lens
- 221g - 102 x 61 x 34mm
- Revealed January 2013
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 129g - 96 x 58 x 16mm
- Launched January 2012
Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony TX200V Overview
Its time to look much closer at the Olympus XZ-10 and Sony TX200V, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Ultracompact by rivals Olympus and Sony. There exists a considerable gap among the image resolutions of the XZ-10 (12MP) and TX200V (18MP) but they feature the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe XZ-10 was announced 13 months later than the TX200V which makes the cameras a generation apart from one another. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus XZ-10 being a Compact camera and the Sony TX200V being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting in to a full comparison, below is a short overview of how the XZ-10 grades against the TX200V for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony TX200V Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus XZ-10 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus XZ-10 Gallery & Sony TX200V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-10 over the Sony TX200V
XZ-10 | TX200V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2013 | January 2012 | More recent by 13 months | |
Manually focus | More exact focus |
Reasons to pick Sony TX200V over the Olympus XZ-10
TX200V | XZ-10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimension | 3.3" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 1230k | 920k | Sharper screen (+310k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus XZ-10 and Sony TX200V
XZ-10 | TX200V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony TX200V Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to lug around your camera, you will need to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus XZ-10 features external dimensions of 102mm x 61mm x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs) while the Sony TX200V has proportions of 96mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") with a weight of 129 grams (0.28 lbs).
Look at the Olympus XZ-10 and Sony TX200V in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are utilising at the time. Here is the front view dimension comparison of the XZ-10 and the TX200V.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the XZ-10 and TX200V is 91 and 96 respectively.
Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony TX200V Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be hard to picture the gap in sensor measurements merely by seeing specs. The graphic below might provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the XZ-10 and TX200V.
All in all, both of the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit different MP. You can expect the Sony TX200V to provide greater detail with its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop pictures much more aggressively. The younger XZ-10 provides an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony TX200V Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus XZ-10 vs Sony TX200V Specifications
Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
Revealed | 2013-01-30 | 2012-01-30 |
Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | BIONZ |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 18 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4896 x 3672 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 64 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 35 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/1.8-2.7 | f/3.5-4.8 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 3cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3.3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 920 thousand dots | 1,230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen tech | - | 1,229,760 dots equiv. XtraFine TruBlack OLED display |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 30s | 2s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1600s |
Continuous shooting rate | 5.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 3.10 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps, 18Mbps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps, 9Mbps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 221g (0.49 lbs) | 129g (0.28 lbs) |
Dimensions | 102 x 61 x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 96 x 58 x 16mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 photographs | 220 photographs |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | Li-50B | NP-BN |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch price | $428 | $500 |